Compared with aphakic eyes, UV-blocking untinted IOLs reduced the blue-light irradiance value by 60%; yellow-tinted IOLs conferred an additional 17% to 56% reduction. The difference in lens power was significantly related to the blue-light irradiance value of some yellow-tinted IOLs. .
Surveys and epidemiological studies have shown an increased prevalence of cataracts in workers in the glass and steel industries. These cataracts are associated with exposure to intense infrared radiation (IR) emitted from heated materials and industrial furnaces. Thermal model calculations predicted that near and far IR would cause cataract with different mechanisms. The present study investigated cataract formation by near IR. Eyes of pigmented rabbits were exposed to IR at a wavelength of 808 nm. Morphological changes in the anterior segment of the eye were assessed by slit‐lamp microscopy, and temperature distributions in the anterior chamber of the eye were observed during IR exposure using microencapsulated thermochromic liquid crystals. Cortical cataract appeared below the exposed area of the iris in eyes that had been exposed for 6 min to an irradiance of 1.27 W cm−2 or higher. The monitored temperature in the anterior chamber began to increase in the region adjacent to the exposed area of the iris with the onset of IR exposure. These results demonstrate that 808‐nm IR is absorbed and converted to heat within the iris, which is then conducted to the lens and produce a cataract, as Goldmann theory states.
Intraocular stability during or after cataract and glaucoma filtration surgeries and vitreous surgery with a gas/silicone oil tamponade might differ among intraocular lenses (IOLs). We used six different one-piece IOL models and measured the force that displaced the IOLs from the vitreous cavity to anterior chamber as a measure of stability against the pressure gradient between the anterior and posterior IOL surfaces. We measured IOL hardness, haptics junction area, and posterior IOL bulge to identify what determines the IOL displacement force. The KOWA YP2.2 IOL (1.231 mN) required significantly greater force than the HOYA XY1 (0.416 mN, p = 0.0004), HOYA 255 (0.409 mN, p = 0.0003), Alcon SN60WF (0.507 mN, p = 0.0010), and Nidek NS60YG (0.778 mN, p = 0.0186) IOLs; J&J ZCB00V IOL (1.029 mN) required greater force than the HOYA XY1 (p = 0.0032) and HOYA 255 (p = 0.0029) IOLs; the Nidek NS60YG IOL required greater force than the HOYA 255 (p = 0.0468) IOL. The haptics junction area was correlated positively with the IOL displacement force (r = 0.8536, p = 0.0306); the correlations of the other parameters were non-significant. After adjusting for any confounding effects, the haptics junction area was correlated significantly with the IOL displacement force (p = 0.0394); the IOL hardness (p = 0.0573) and posterior IOL bulge (p = 0.0938) were not. The forces that displace IOLs anteriorly differed among one-piece soft-acrylic IOLs, and the optics/haptics junction area was the major force determinant.
Compared to aphakic eyes, currently available UV-blocking clear and yellow-tinted IOLs reduce the BLI values by 43-82%. However, the data presented in this study are not directly applicable to humans implanted with IOLs or for the use of IOLs in a clinical situation, since in those cases the balance between photoprotection and photoreception must be taken into account.
Yellow-tinted IOLs absorb more circadian rhythm-associated light than clear IOLs. The difference in the lens power is significantly related to the MSI value in some yellow-tinted IOLs. To correlate the current data with the clinical relevance of these findings, the percent loss of the MSI leading to a circadian rhythm disorder needs to be clarified.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.