Even with the in-depth implementation of forestry ecological projects, such as restoring farmland to forest (grass) in the loess area of northern Shaanxi, the characteristics of soil macrofauna communities and their coupling relationship with environmental factors after vegetation restoration in the study area are yet obscure. However, the soil macrofauna community characteristics are of great significance for evaluating the effectiveness of vegetation restoration in the study area. Therefore, the study aims to reveal the characteristics of the soil macrofauna community and their coupling relationships with the environment in the loess area of northern Shaanxi. In this study, all organisms of the five typical vegetation types in the study area were collected by manual sorting (Armeniaca sibirica and Populus simonii mixed forest (M), Robinia pseudoacacia (P), Populus simonii (S), Populus hopeiensis (H) and Hippophae rhamnoides (R)), and the adjacent abandoned grassland (G) was used as a control group. The group number and the individual number of soil macrofauna of different vegetation types in the study area and their coupling relationships with environmental factors are studied, and the following conclusions were drawn. (1) The study shows that there are certain differences in the environmental factors of different vegetation types in the study area, which include the significant differences in the alkaline nitrogen content of various vegetation types (p < 0.05). (2) The effects of different vegetation on soil macrofauna community were different. There were no significant differences in the soil macrofauna community structure between Armeniaca sibirica and Populus simonii mixed forest, Robinia pseudoacacia, Populus simonii and Populus hopeiensis, but there was a large difference from that of the abandoned grasslands. The community density of soil macrofauna in Armeniaca sibirica and Populus simonii mixed forest and Populus simonii were significantly higher than that in the abandoned grassland (p < 0.05), but the other indexes showed no significant differences. The Shannon–Wiener index of Robinia pseudoacacia and Populus hopeiensis were much lower than that of the abandoned grassland (p < 0.05). (3) The diversity of soil macrofauna communities was mainly affected by pH, alkaline nitrogen, potassium available, vegetation coverage and litter production. (4) Different groups of soil macrofauna were closely related and reacted differently to environmental factors, and vegetation coverage, litter production and alkaline nitrogen content were the key factors affecting the composition of soil macrofauna communities.
Niche theory is significant for understanding the function of community structure, interspecific relationships, and community dynamic succession. However, there are few studies on the soil animal niche in returning farmland to forest areas on the Loess Plateau, making it challenging to comprehend the utilization of soil animal resources, the stability of the local community, and the succession process in the areas. Therefore, this study collected soil animals in five typical vegetation types: Robinia pseudoacacia (R), Hippophae rhamnoides (H), Populus simonii (P), Pinus tabulaeformis (T), and Armeniaca sibirica x Hippophae rhamnoides (M), with abandoned grassland (G) used as a control group. Then, the number of soil animal taxa, individuals, diversity, and niche were sampled and examined in the study areas during the four seasons of spring, summer, autumn, and winter using the manual sorting method and the Tullgren method. The results revealed that 3872 soil animals from 3 Phyla, 8 Classes, 22 Orders, and 49 Families were captured in the study areas. The dominant groups of soil macrofauna were Diptera larvae, Julidae, and Formicidae, and the dominant groups of meso–micro soil fauna were Oribatida, Protospira, and Collembola juveniles. Soil animals have rich nutritional function groups, with the most saprophytic soil animal groups. The individual density and taxa number of soil animals in G were lower than other vegetation on the whole. H, M, and P had a higher Shannon–Winner index than the other vegetation. Seasonal changes had different effects on macro and meso–micro soil fauna. The diversity of soil macrofauna is higher in spring and summer, and that of meso–micro soil fauna is higher in autumn and winter. Oribatida, Diptera Larvae, and Formicidae had a large niche width in the main taxa of soil animals, with universal adaptability to the environment. Cicadellidae and Culicidae had narrow niche widths and were highly dependent on resources and the environment. There were 67 pairs of highly overlapped (Oik > 0.8) taxa of soil animals and 56 pairs of moderately overlapped (0.6 < Oik ≤ 0.8) taxa, accounting for 80.39% of the total number of taxa. Soil animals had high commonality in resource utilization, intense competition, and poor community stability. As a result, we can conclude that the soil animal community in the study areas was in the stage of succession.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.