Summary Background The popularity of dermal fillers has grown rapidly in the last few years for facial rejuvenation. Plasma gel is an autologous gelatinous material that is prepared from the patient's own platelet poor plasma. Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of plasma gel injection as a dermal filler for facial rejuvenation. Patients and Methods The current study was carried out on 52 females presented with facial aging divided into two groups: Group A included 34 females with facial wrinkles, and Group B included 18 females with tear trough deformity. After taking written informed consent, they received two sessions of plasma gel injections at 2‐week interval and followed up monthly for 3 months. They were assessed clinically before treatment sessions and at the end of follow‐up period. Results Both studied groups showed immediate significant clinical improvement after plasma gel injection that maintained till the end of follow‐up period. This finding was confirmed by significant reduction in the mean values of Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) in Group A and Tear Trough Rating Scale (TTRS) in group B, and significant improvement of skin homogeneity and texture in both groups. In general, the reported side effects were minimal and transient. Conclusion Autologous platelet poor plasma gel injection seems to be a cost‐effective, safe, well‐tolerated, and minimally invasive technique producing significant aesthetic correction of facial wrinkles and tear trough deformity.
Carboxytherapy seems to be a promising therapeutic option for patchy AA and could be helpful as an adjuvant therapy of AGA but more than 6 sessions are required and adjuvants are recommended for maintenance of the results.
Infraorbital dark circles and tear trough deformity are considered common aesthetic problems. Numerous therapeutic modalities have been suggested with variable outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of platelet-poor plasma (PPP) gel vs platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in infraorbital rejuvenation. A total of 68 females presented with dark circles and/or tear trough deformity were recruited and treated by PPP gel injection in the right infraorbital region (Group A) and PRP injection in the left infraorbital region (Group B). They received three treatment sessions at 2-week interval, and followed up monthly for 3 months. They were evaluated clinically and dermoscopically before treatment and at the end of follow-up period. Both groups showed significant clinical improvements proved by significant reduction of degree of hyperpigmentation and tear trough rating scale. Obviously, more significant clinical and dermoscopic improvements were observed in Group A than Group B. Therefore, it could be concluded that both PPP gel and PRP were clinically effective procedures for aesthetic improvement of infraorbital region. Moreover, PPP gel seems to be significantly more effective than PRP as a therapeutic modality.
Glucose transporter-1 could play a role not only in the onset of psoriasis but also in the progression and severity of the disease. It may participate in the pathogenesis of psoriasis through the facilitation of epidermal hyperproliferation, inflammation, and angiogenesis.
Regardless of the continuous discovery of innovative modalities for the treatment of vitiligo, none of them ensure excellent therapeutic outcome. Microneedling had been suggested either singly or concomitantly with other therapeutic modalities for vitiligo with encouraging results. Latanoprost, a prostaglandin F2-alpha (PGF2α), and their analogues are recently recommended for vitiligo treatment. This study was designed to assess the therapeutic efficacy of microneedling in combination with NB-UVB phototherapy versus their combination with latanoprost in vitiligo. It was conducted on 50 patients presented with stable bilateral localized nonsegmental vitiligo. In every patient; two bilateral, nearly symmetrical lesions were selected and treated by microneedling (12 sessions at 2-week interval) followed by topical application of latanoprost 0.005% solution on one side, and topical saline (as placebo) on the other side. In addition, all patients received concomitant NB-UVB phototherapy (three sessions/week) for 6 months. Significant clinical improvement of vitiligo lesions with significant increase in the degree of repigmentation were reported in response to both treatment regimens. Latanoprost in combination with microneedling and NB-UVB provides more significant therapeutic outcomes than combined microneedling and NB-UVB. In conclusion, topical latanoprost 0.005% enhances the therapeutic efficacy of combined microneedling and NB-UVB phototherapy in localized stable nonsegmental vitiligo.
Keloids characterize a definitely challenging type of cutaneous scars for which a diversity of therapeutic modalities has been suggested. The aim of this work was to compare the therapeutic efficacy of intralesional injection of botulinum toxin type‐A (BTX‐A), platelet rich plasma (PRP), and triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) in keloids. A total of 60 keloids patients were enrolled and divided randomly into three equal groups. Group I treated by intralesional BTX‐A injection, group II treated by intralesional PRP injection, and group III treated by intralesional TAC injection. Clinical assessment was done by Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), Verbal Rating Scale (VRS), and dermoscopic examination. Additionally, histopathology and immunohistochemistry of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) expression were evaluated. The results of this study revealed significant improvement of both VSS and VRS in response to all treatment modalities. There was significant improvement of VSS in BTX‐A and PRP groups more than TAC group. However, no significant difference observed between BTX‐A and PRP groups. Immunohistochemical examination showed significant decrease of CTGF expression after treatment in BTX‐A and PRP groups more than TAC group. In conclusion, both BTX‐A and PRP could yield a chance for cosmetically better outcomes in keloids treatment than conventional TAC injection.
Background: Podoplanin is one of the integral molecules controlling cellular motility and migration that is considered crucial in initiating tumor invasiveness and metastasis. Objective: This work aimed at studying the immunohistochemical expression of podoplanin in nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) and seborrheic keratosis (SK) in comparison to normal control skin and to evaluate its possible role in their pathogenesis. Patients and Methods: This study included 120 patients and paraffin blocks of epidermal tumors [30 SK, 30 basal cell carcinoma (BCC), 30 basosquamous carcinoma (BSC) and 30 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)], in addition to 30 normal control skin specimens from age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers. All were examined for intratumoral and peritumoral immunohistochemical expression of podoplanin antibody (D2-40). In addition, morphometric measurement of lymphatic vessel density was evaluated in all studied specimens. Results: Podoplanin expression was significantly upregulated in all the studied epidermal tumor specimens in comparison to normal control skin specimens. The highest mean value of podoplanin expression (both intratumoral and peritumoral cells) was observed in SCC followed by BSC, then BCC, SK, and control skin in the same sequence. Positive correlations were detected between its expression in both BSC and SCC with the mean of lymphatic vessel density in the studied specimens and the presence of lymph node metastasis. Conclusions: Podoplanin plays an evident role in the development and progression of both benign and malignant skin neoplasms and may serve as a potential predictor of their clinical course and prognosis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
334 Leonard St
Brooklyn, NY 11211
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.