Background:
The aim of this study was to conduct a population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of meropenem and to explore the optimal dosing strategy for meropenem in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury receiving treatment with continuous hemodiafiltration (CHDF).
Methods:
Blood samples were obtained on days 1, 2, and 5 after the start of meropenem administration, immediately before dosing, and at 1, 2, 6, and 8 hours after dosing. Population PK model analysis was performed and concentration-time profiles were simulated using the Nonlinear Mixed Effects Model software.
Results:
Twenty-one patients receiving CHDF in our intensive care unit were enrolled and 350 serum concentration–time data points were obtained. The PKs of meropenem were best described using a 2-compartment model. Typical total and intercompartmental clearance values were 4.22 L/h and 7.84 L/h, respectively, whereas the central and peripheral compartment volumes of distribution were 14.82 L and 11.75 L, respectively. Estimated glomerular filtration rate was identified as a significant covariate of meropenem total clearance. In simulations of patients with renal failure receiving CHDF, the dose was affected by estimated glomerular filtration rate; a dose of 0.5 g every 8 hours or 1 g every 12 hours showed the probability of target attainment of achieving 100% time above the minimum inhibitory concentration for bacteria with a minimum inhibitory concentration ≤2 mg/L.
Conclusions:
A population PK model was developed for meropenem in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury receiving CHDF. Our results indicated that a meropenem dosage of 0.5 g every 8 hours or 1 g every 12 hours was suitable in this population and for susceptible bacteria.
Pharmacists began preparing drug solutions intraoperatively for postoperative analgesia in the Department of Surgery at Chiba University Hospital from May 2014. To verify the usefulness of pharmacists preparing these drug solutions, we conducted a questionnaire survey among 51 anesthesiologists and received 44 responses (recovery rate 86.3%). Burden on the anesthesiologists was signiˆcantly reduced both temporally and mentally when the pharmacists prepared the drug solutions compared with when the anesthesiologists did (p < 0.01). The anesthesiologists' degree of anxiety about sometimes having to prepare drug solutions alone without any conˆrmation was also signiˆcantly reduced when pharmacists prepared them (p < 0.01), which implies the need for a double-check system. In addition, 88.6% of anesthesiologists said that they were reassured with preparations done by the pharmacists under a sterile environment using a clean bench. Overall, 88.6% of anesthesiologists responded that they were satisˆed with the preparation of drug solutions by pharmacists. Based on the results of this survey, pharmacists' preparation of drug solutions for postoperative analgesia is considered to be useful in ensuring the quality and safety of medical care because it reduced anesthesiologists' work to prepare the drug solutions, allowing them to concentrate on anesthesia and related work, it established a double-check system between the two staŠ teams, and it was done under a sterile environment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.