IntroductionEarly life stress (ELS) caused by abuse and bullying has increased dramatically, however, effective means for accurate detection have not been found. Some decades ago, an association between stress and dental caries was suggested. However, even now, stress is not recognized widely as a potential risk factor for caries. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to verify the possible effects of stress by comparing them to the effects of saliva factors and the microorganisms that pose a general caries risk.
MethodsWe conducted cross-sectional observation research on 30 children with mental problems, diagnosed as 'stressed,' and 30 age-matched unstressed children in the same elementary school. An oral examination (dental caries diagnosis) and an oral environment survey (saliva test) were carried out in 2007. Further, the concentration and activity of salivary stress proteins were measured. All variables were statistically analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test, correlation, and multivariate analysis.
ResultsThe dental caries experience ratio was significantly higher in the stress group, and only the concentration of CgA, a salivary stress protein, showed a significant difference. Unexpectedly, we did not detect any differences in the rates and counts of cariogenic bacteria or salivary buffering activity. Binomial logistic regression analysis only showed significance in the presence or absence of ELS.
ConclusionStress factors may have a stronger influence on caries development in the stress group than in the general caries risk. Therefore, long-term stress, causing changes in the children's bodies, might hint at important factors leading to the development of dental caries.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.