No abstract

Patients at high risk for post-ESD bleeding in gastric epithelial neoplasm were those undergoing dialysis, those in whom operation time was ≥75 min, and those in whom bleeding during ESD was poorly controlled. The latter two are risk factors for bleeding even after second-look endoscopy.

Prevention therapy is recommended for lesions >1/2 of the esophageal circumference. Locoregional steroid injection is recommended for lesions >1/2–3/4 of the esophageal circumference and oral steroids are recommended for lesions >1/2 of the subtotal circumference. For lesions of the entire circumference, oral steroid combined with injection steroid is considered. Endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD) is the first choice of treatment for stricture after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Radical incision and cutting or self‐expandable metallic stent can be considered for refractory stricture after EBD. In case of intraoperative perforation during esophageal ESD, endoscopic clip closure should be initially attempted. Surgery is considered for treatment of delayed perforation. Current standard practice for prevention of delayed bleeding after gastric ESD includes prophylactic coagulation of vessels on post‐ESD ulcers and giving proton pump inhibitors. Chronic kidney disease stage 4 or 5, multiple antithrombotic drug use, anticoagulant use, and heparin bridging therapy are high‐risk factors for delayed bleeding after gastric ESD. Intraoperative perforation during gastric ESD is initially managed by endoscopic clip closure. If endoscopic clip closure is difficult, other methods such as over‐the‐scope clip (OTSC), polyglycolic acid (PGA) sheet shielding etc. are attempted. Delayed perforation usually requires surgical intervention, but endoscopic closure by OTSC or PGA sheet may be considered. Resection of three‐quarters of the circumference is a risk factor for stenosis after gastric ESD. Giving prophylactic local steroid injection and/or oral steroid is reported, but effectiveness has not been fully verified as has been done for esophageal stricture. The main management method for gastric stenosis is EBD but it may cause perforation.

BackgroundAlthough recent guidelines for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) as treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC) recommend noninterruption of low-dose aspirin (LDA) perioperatively, this strategy is controversial. It was our practice to interrupt LDA therapy 5–7 days before to ESD until December 2010, when we instituted the new guidelines and performed ESD without interrupting LDA therapy. Our purpose in this study was to confirm the validity of noninterrupted use of LDA in patients undergoing ESD for EGC.MethodsWe studied 78 consecutive patients with 94 EGCs who were routinely taking LDA and were treated by ESD at Hiroshima University Hospital between April 2005 and June 2012. The patients were of two groups: those in whom LDA was interrupted perioperatively (53 patients with 66 EGCs) and those in whom LDA was continued perioperatively (25 patients with 28 EGCs).ResultsThe complete resection rate was 92.4 % (61/66) in the LDA-interrupted group and 100 % (28/28) in the LDA-continued group. Incidences of poor bleeding control during the procedure and bleeding after procedure were 10.6 % (7/66) and 4.8 % (3/66), respectively, in the LDA-interrupted group and 7.1 % (2/28) and 3.6 % (1/28) in the LDA-continued group. Two patients in the interrupted-LDA group suffered cerebrovascular infarction before ESD, and 2 patients in this group suffered acute myocardial infarction after ESD.ConclusionsOur data suggest that continued use of LDA does not increase the risk of bleeding during or after ESD for EGC and does decrease the risk of ischemic events.

Our data suggest that refractory post-ESD stenosis occurs after entire circumferential esophageal ESD with muscle layer damage and ≥5 cm of longitudinal mucosal defect length.

No abstract

BackgroundBlue laser imaging (BLI) and linked color imaging (LCI) are the color enhancement features of the LASEREO endoscopic system, which provide a narrow band light observation function and expansion and reduction of the color information, respectively.MethodsWe examined 82 patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) diagnosed between April 2014 and August 2015. Five expert and 5 non-expert endoscopists retrospectively compared images obtained on non-magnifying BLI bright mode (BLI-BRT) and LCI with those obtained via conventional white light imaging (WLI). Interobserver agreement was also assessed.ResultsIn experts’ evaluation of the images, an improvement in visibility was observed in 73% (60/82) and 20% (16/82) of cases under LCI and BLI-BRT, respectively. In non-experts’ evaluation of the images, an improvement in visibility was observed in 76.8% (63/82) and 24.3% (20/82) of cases under LCI and BLI-BRT, respectively. There were no significant differences between experts and non-experts in the evaluation of the images. The improvement in visibility was significantly higher with LCI than with BLI-BRT in experts and non-experts (p < 0.01). With regard to tumor color on WLI, the improvement in the visibility of reddish and whitish tumors was significantly higher than that of isochromatic tumors when LCI was used. The improvement in visibility with LCI was observed in 71% (12/17) and 74% (48/65) of patients with and without Helicobacter pylori (Hp) eradication, respectively; no significant difference in improvement was observed between these groups. The interobserver agreement was good to satisfactory at ≥ 0.62.ConclusionsIn conclusion, our study showed that LCI improved the visibility of EGC, regardless of the level of endoscopists’ experience or Hp eradication in patients, particularly for EGCs with a reddish or whitish color. The improvement in visibility was significantly higher with LCI than that with BLI.

Although further development is needed, we conclude that our computer-based analysis system used with BLI will identify gastric cancers quantitatively.