A large-aperture (150 mm and 230 mm in diameter) x-ray TV-type detector has been developed for x-ray diffraction with synchrotron radiation. The detector consists of a beryllium-windowed x-ray image intensifier, an optical lens, a charge coupled device (CCD) image sensor, and data acquisition system. The spatial resolution is 270 μm(FWHM), and the dynamic range is 6000:1. The noise level is quantum limited. The nonuniformity of response and image distortion is corrected by software. When a TV-rate (NTSC-mode) CCD is used as an image sensor, time-resolved measurements with a rate of 30 frame/s can be achieved with its noise quantum limited.

The findings of this study indicate that NMK36 is well tolerated. NMK36 has favorable characteristics for imaging brain and pelvic tumors, such as low brain uptake, slow urinary excretion, and high in vivo stability.

Background Intramedullary osteosclerosis (IMOS) is a rare condition without specific radiological findings except for the osteosclerotic lesion and is not associated with family history and infection, trauma, or systemic illness. Although the diagnosis of IMOS is confirmed after excluding other osteosclerotic lesions, IMOS is not well known because of its rarity and no specific feature. Therefore, these situations might result in delayed diagnosis. Hence, this case report aimed to investigate three cases of IMOS and discuss imaging findings and clinical outcomes. Case presentation All three cases were examined between 2015 and 2019. The location of osteosclerotic lesions were femoral diaphyses in the 60-year-old man (Case 1) and 41-year-old woman (Case 2) and tibial diaphysis in the 44-year-old woman (Case 3). All cases complained of severe pain and showed massive diaphyseal osteosclerotic lesions in plain radiograms and computed tomography (CT) scans. Cases 2 and 3 were examined using the triphasic bone scan, and a fusiform-shaped intense area of the tracer uptake on delayed bone image was detected in both cases without (Case 2) or slightly increased vascularity (Case 3) on the blood pool image, which was reported as a specific finding of IMOS. Open biopsy was performed in all cases, and histologic section showed trabecular bone sclerosis with hypocellular fibrous tissues, finally diagnosed as IMOS. The pain was sharply improved after biopsy and kept at the latest follow-up periods (34, 33, and 6 months in Cases 1, 2, and 3, respectively). Conclusions Massive sclerotic lesions with severe pain in the diaphyseal region of long bones should be considered as IMOS to avoid the delayed diagnosis, although other sclerotic bony lesions should be carefully excluded. Triphasic bone scan with a fusiform-shaped intense area of tracer uptake on delayed bone image and without or slightly increased vascularity on the blood pool image will help confirm IMOS. The role of open biopsy was to confirm the diagnosis of IMOS and to give the severe pain relief immediately in the three cases, although more cases and long-term follow-up are necessary.

Septal penetration of high-energy photons affects quantitative results in imaging of 123 I-labeled tracers. We investigated acquisition protocols (collimator choice and energy window setting) and correction methods for estimating the heart-to-mediastinum (H/M) ratio in cardiac 123 I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) imaging. Methods: Four hours after 123 I-MIBG injection, 40 patients successively underwent planar anterior chest imaging with the medium-energy (ME) (ME method) and low-energy high-resolution (LEHR) (LEHR method) collimators. A 20% energy window was used for both collimators. Another 40 patients were imaged successively with the ME collimator and a 20% window (ME method), the low-medium-energy (LME) collimator and a 20% window (LME20 method), and the LME collimator and a 15% window (LME15 method). The H/M ratios obtained by the LEHR, LME20, and LME15 methods were corrected using their correlations with the H/M ratio obtained by the ME method (empiric correction). The 123 I-dual-window (IDW) correction was also applied to remove the influence of high-energy photons. Results: Without correction, severe underestimation of the H/M ratio was shown for the LEHR method using the ME method as a standard, and this underestimation increased with increasing H/M ratios. Underestimation substantially decreased using the LME20 method and further using the LME15 method. Empiric correction reduced the error in the H/M ratio by the LEHR method, but the error was still evident. After empiric correction, the H/M ratios with the LME collimator were comparable to those with the ME collimator. The IDW correction only partially reduced underestimation by the LEHR method and caused a small overestimation for the LME15 method. Conclusion: The use of an LME collimator appears to be acceptable for cardiac 123 I-MIBG imaging as an alternative to an ME collimator, and the application of a 15% energy window is recommended when an LME collimator is used. Empiric correction is also expected to improve exchangeability between H/M ratios calculated with ME and LME collimators. Neither the use of an LEHR collimator nor the use of IDW correction is recommended.

This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of clinical, radiological, and histopathological examinations for differential diagnosis between atypical lipomatous tumor (ALT)/well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLS) and lipoma, and aimed to develop a new combined scoring system for the preoperative diagnosis of ALT/WDLS. Eighty-nine lipomas and 56 ALT/WDLS were included and their clinical characteristics, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, histological findings by hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining were investigated. Then, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed for the findings, and a combined scoring system consisted of predictive factors of ALT/WDLS was developed. The univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that tumor location (lower extremity), deep site, size (> 11 cm), thick septa (> 2 mm), enhancement of septa or nodular lesions, and lipoblasts were significantly different for the diagnosis of ALT/WDLS. We developed a combined scoring system based on the six predictive factors (total 0–16 points, the cutoff was 9 points). The area under the curve was 0.945, and sensitivity was 87.6% and specificity was 91.1% by the receiver operating characteristics curve. This combined scoring system does not require special equipment and reagents such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and anyone can use it easily in many medical institutions with high diagnostic accuracy.