Background Antibiotic resistance is increasing to dangerously high levels globally with subsequent higher medical costs, prolonged hospital stays and increased levels of mortality. Ensuring patients’ knowledge, attitude, and proper use of antimicrobials is one of the strategies to control resistance. The aim of this study is to evaluate the public awareness, attitude, and practice regarding antimicrobial use and resistance in Kemissie Town, Northeast Ethiopia. Methods A community-based, cross-sectional study was conducted on 385 adults selected using systematic random sampling in Kemissie town from March 1 to May 1, 2019. A home-to-home visit interview was done using a structured interview guide. The data were coded individually and entered into a computer using Epi-info version 3.5.1 and then exported to SPSS version 23.0 for analysis. Univariate analyses were used to describe the categorical variables. Results Of the 345 respondents who took antibiotics, three quarters (74.78%) received antibiotics with a prescription. Of the total respondents, 17.7% of the participants believed unnecessary use of antibiotics enhances resistance to bacteria. Of those who took antibiotics, the majority (72.5 %) finished the full course of treatment. Out of the total 374 respondents, 41.6% had awareness on the fact that antibiotics resistance can affect the development of resistance in the whole community. More than half (51.9%) of the respondents believed that the rational use of antibiotics can reduce the risk of antimicrobial resistance. Conclusion The majority of the respondents were still unaware of antibiotic resistance and its implications. This requires close attention from policy-makers and healthcare professionals. The community of Kemissie town had a positive attitude towards finishing antibiotic regimens. This study also identified crucial gaps in the practices of the community about the use of antibiotics.

Balanites rotundifolia (BR) (Van Tiegh.) Blatter (Balanitaceae) has been used in Ethiopian folk medicine to treat malaria, despite the lack of scientific validation. Therefore, the present study was carried out to evaluate the antiplasmodial activity of 80% methanol leaf extract of BR in mice. Both the 4-day suppressive test and Rane’s test were employed. Three extract doses (BR100 mg/kg, BR200 mg/kg, and BR400 mg/kg/d) were given orally, and chloroquine was the standard drug administered through the same route. Outcome measures for evaluating antiplasmodial efficacy were parasitemia level, packed cell volume, survival time, and body temperature as well as body weight change. Moreover, preliminary phytochemical and acute toxicity studies were carried out. With the 4-day suppressive test, BR demonstrated dose-dependent significant reduction in parasitemia level at all test doses compared to the negative control: BR400 (67%, P<0.001), BR200 (42%, P<0.01), and BR100 (37%, P<0.05). With Rane’s test as well, BR significantly (P<0.001 for all test doses) reduced the parasitemia level by 38% (BR100), 45% (BR200), and 69% (BR400) in comparison to vehicle treatment. The crude extract was estimated to have oral median lethal dose higher than 2,000 mg/kg, and the presence of alkaloids and cardiac glycosides was confirmed. Therefore, this study for the first time validated the antiplasmodial activity of crude leaf extract of BR. Further investigations for isolating specific phytochemicals and elucidating mechanisms are needed to address the quest for novel antimalarial drugs.

Background: Surgical site infections are global healthcare problems. Although surgical site infections are preventable, they still cause significant morbidity, high death rates, and financial stress on national budgets and individual patients. Inappropriate uses of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis are increasing and worsening patients' quality of life. This study determined the incidence and risk factors of surgical site infections. Methods: Institution-based retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using a structured data abstraction format on patients who were attending at the surgical ward of Borumeda hospital from April 1, 2017, to March 31, 2019. The data were collected during July 15-30, 2019. A systematic random sampling technique was employed to select 227 surgical cases. Multivariate logistic regression was computed using the statistical package for social sciences version 23. Results: The incidence of surgical site infections was 46.7%. Prophylaxis was administered to 188 (82.8%) surgical cases. Prophylaxis was recommended for 151 (66.5%). Out of these, only 143 (94.7%) received prophylaxis. One hundred seventy-four (78.4%) of the procedures had appropriate indication. The compliance of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis use was 13.7%. The predictors of surgical site infections were receiving prophylaxis more than 24 h after surgery (AOR=3.53, 95%

Background: The continuum from surgically clean, through antiseptic techniques to the use of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis has revolutionized surgical practice and significantly reduced morbidity. Adherence to use of prophylactic antibiotic guidelines varies in different set ups and different diseases. Objective: To document the practice of perioperative prophylactic antibiotic use in a teaching hospital in Eritrea Methods: This is a prospective study conducted in 2009 in Halibet Hospital, Asmara, Eritrea Results: One hundred and one patients were enrolled in the study. Sixty nine percent received prophylactic antibiotics. Of these, 30% were preoperatively and 39% postoperatively. Twenty one percent the majority of whom were in the clean/contaminated group did not receive the required prophylaxis. The surgery site infection rate was 6% mostly from emergency operations recognized during the period of hospitalization. Discussion and conclusion: The use of prophylactic antibiotics in Halibet Hospital needs to be standardized and monitored based on evidence and international benchmarks.

Background Lack of clear and precise oral and written information from both the doctors and/or pharmacists on the management of prescribed medication has led to therapeutic failure, as a result of patients not comprehending instructions. Incorrect interpretation of labels can lead to incorrect usage of medication therefore the occurrence of medication error and/or adverse event. The concern of this study was to assess misunderstanding of dosing instructions among outpatients in Dessie Referral Hospital (DRH). Methods An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted on 384 outpatients at DRH from February 10 to March 15, 2019. Study subjects were selected by using a systematic random sampling technique and data was collected by using questionnaires and observation. The data was coded individually and entered in a computer using Epi Info™ version 3.5.1 and then exported to SPSS version 23.0 for analysis. Univariate analyses were used to describe the categorical variables. Chi-square test was used to assess association of variables with primary outcome. P-value <0.05 was considered as statistical significance. Results This study showed that most of the respondents n=298 (77.6%) misunderstood more than one dosage instruction, 8.75% misunderstood the dose, 51.3% misunderstood the frequency while 58.59% misunderstood the duration of treatment. The misunderstanding was higher for labeled medications (11.4%) than unlabelled (7.7%). Conclusion The prevalence of misunderstanding of dosing instruction was high in outpatients of DRH. Hence standard procedures must be developed to provide easy and clear dosing instructions to patients, and continuous training must be provided for pharmacists on proper communication of dosing instructions to patients.