Therefore, a conserved mechanism for meiotic kinetochore regulation remains elusive.Here we have identified meiosis-specific kinetochore factor MEIKIN in mouse, which functions in meiosis I but neither in meiosis II nor in mitosis. MEIKIN plays a crucial role in both mono-orientation and centromeric cohesion protection, partly by stabilizing the localization of the cohesin protector shugoshin. These functions are mediated largely by the activity of Polo-like kinase PLK1, which is enriched to kinetochores depending on MEIKIN. Our integrative analysis indicates that MEIKIN is the long awaited key regulator of meiotic kinetochore function, which is conserved from yeasts to humans. 2In mitosis, sister chromatid cohesion is established depending on cohesin in S phase and maintained until metaphase when the sister chromatids are captured by spindle microtubules from opposite poles and aligned on the spindle equator. For the onset of anaphase, the anaphase-promoting complex (APC) triggers the degradation of securin, an inhibitory chaperone for separase that cleaves cohesin RAD21 and removes cohesin along the entire chromosome. This removal of cohesin triggers the separation of sister chromatids and their movement to opposite poles, a process called equational division [1][2][3] . During meiosis, however, meiotic cohesin REC8 largely replaces RAD21 along the entire chromosomes; one round of DNA replication is followed by two rounds of nuclear division, which results in four haploid nuclei or gametes (Fig. 1a).In the first division of meiosis (meiosis I), homologous chromosomes connected by chiasmata are captured from the opposite poles, while sisters are captured from the same pole (mono-orientation). At the onset of anaphase I, REC8 cohesin is cleaved by separase along the arm regions, but protected at centromeres until metaphase II 4-6 . Thus, mono-orientation and centromeric cohesion protection are two hallmarks of meiotic kinetochore function, which are widely conserved among eukaryotic organisms 7-9 (Fig. 1a). There is accumulating evidence that cohesion protection is mediated by the centromeric protein shugoshin (SGO) and its partner protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) [10][11][12][13][14][15] , which antagonizes REC8 phosphorylation, a prerequisite of cleavage 16, 17 . So far, meiosis-specific kinetochore proteins have been identified only in two yeasts (S. cerevisiae Spo13 and Mam1 (monopolin subunit), and S. pombe Moa1) [18][19][20][21][22][23] . Puzzlingly, however, because their structural and functional similarities remain to be identified, conservation of meiotic kinetochore regulation is questionable even between yeasts 8, 9 . Therefore, in this study, we address the long-standing question of whether meiotic kinetochore regulation is conserved from yeasts to mammals, and, if so, how. Mammalian meiotic kinetochore protein MEIKINFission yeast Moa1 interacts directly with the conserved kinetochore protein Cnp3 (CENP-C homolog), and localizes to the kinetochore in meiosis I 24 . To identify an equivalent meiosis...

The frequency of chromosome segregation errors during meiosis I (MI) in oocytes increases with age. The two-hit model suggests that errors are caused by the combination of a first hit that creates susceptible crossover configurations and a second hit comprising an age-related reduction in chromosome cohesion. This model predicts an age-related increase in univalents, but direct evidence of this phenomenon as a major cause of segregation errors has been lacking. Here, we provide the first live analysis of single chromosomes undergoing segregation errors during MI in the oocytes of naturally aged mice. Chromosome tracking reveals that 80% of the errors are preceded by bivalent separation into univalents. The set of the univalents is biased towards balanced and unbalanced predivision of sister chromatids during MI. Moreover, we find univalents predisposed to predivision in human oocytes. This study defines premature bivalent separation into univalents as the primary defect responsible for age-related aneuploidy.

Because low levels of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) appear not to activate the ATM-mediated prophase I checkpoint in full-grown oocytes, there may exist mechanisms to protect chromosome integrity during meiotic maturation. Using live imaging we demonstrate that low levels of DSBs induced by the radiomimetic drug Neocarzinostatin (NCS) increase the incidence of chromosome fragments and lagging chromosomes but do not lead to APC/C activation and anaphase onset delay. The number of DSBs, represented by gH2AX foci, significantly decreases between prophase I and metaphase II in both control and NCS-treated oocytes. Transient treatment with NCS increases >2-fold the number of DSBs in prophase I oocytes, but less than 30% of these oocytes enter anaphase with segregation errors. MRE11, but not ATM, is essential to detect DSBs in prophase I and is involved in H2AX phosphorylation during metaphase I. Inhibiting MRE11 by mirin during meiotic maturation results in anaphase bridges and also increases the number of gH2AX foci in metaphase II. Compromised DNA integrity in mirin-treated oocytes indicates a role for MRE11 in chromosome integrity during meiotic maturation.

Therefore, a conserved mechanism for meiotic kinetochore regulation remains elusive.Here we have identified meiosis-specific kinetochore factor MEIKIN in mouse, which functions in meiosis I but neither in meiosis II nor in mitosis. MEIKIN plays a crucial role in both mono-orientation and centromeric cohesion protection, partly by stabilizing the localization of the cohesin protector shugoshin. These functions are mediated largely by the activity of Polo-like kinase PLK1, which is enriched to kinetochores depending on MEIKIN. Our integrative analysis indicates that MEIKIN is the long awaited key regulator of meiotic kinetochore function, which is conserved from yeasts to humans. 2In mitosis, sister chromatid cohesion is established depending on cohesin in S phase and maintained until metaphase when the sister chromatids are captured by spindle microtubules from opposite poles and aligned on the spindle equator. For the onset of anaphase, the anaphase-promoting complex (APC) triggers the degradation of securin, an inhibitory chaperone for separase that cleaves cohesin RAD21 and removes cohesin along the entire chromosome. This removal of cohesin triggers the separation of sister chromatids and their movement to opposite poles, a process called equational division [1][2][3] . During meiosis, however, meiotic cohesin REC8 largely replaces RAD21 along the entire chromosomes; one round of DNA replication is followed by two rounds of nuclear division, which results in four haploid nuclei or gametes (Fig. 1a).In the first division of meiosis (meiosis I), homologous chromosomes connected by chiasmata are captured from the opposite poles, while sisters are captured from the same pole (mono-orientation). At the onset of anaphase I, REC8 cohesin is cleaved by separase along the arm regions, but protected at centromeres until metaphase II 4-6 . Thus, mono-orientation and centromeric cohesion protection are two hallmarks of meiotic kinetochore function, which are widely conserved among eukaryotic organisms 7-9 (Fig. 1a). There is accumulating evidence that cohesion protection is mediated by the centromeric protein shugoshin (SGO) and its partner protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) [10][11][12][13][14][15] , which antagonizes REC8 phosphorylation, a prerequisite of cleavage 16, 17 . So far, meiosis-specific kinetochore proteins have been identified only in two yeasts (S. cerevisiae Spo13 and Mam1 (monopolin subunit), and S. pombe Moa1) [18][19][20][21][22][23] . Puzzlingly, however, because their structural and functional similarities remain to be identified, conservation of meiotic kinetochore regulation is questionable even between yeasts 8, 9 . Therefore, in this study, we address the long-standing question of whether meiotic kinetochore regulation is conserved from yeasts to mammals, and, if so, how. Mammalian meiotic kinetochore protein MEIKINFission yeast Moa1 interacts directly with the conserved kinetochore protein Cnp3 (CENP-C homolog), and localizes to the kinetochore in meiosis I 24 . To identify an equivalent meiosis...

As part of the central core domain of the ribosome, helix 69 of 23S rRNA participates in an important intersubunit bridge and contacts several protein translation factors. Helix 69 is believed to play key roles in protein synthesis. Even though high-resolution crystal structures of the ribosome exist, the solution dynamics and roles of individual nucleotides in H69 are still not well defined. To better understand the influence of modified nucleotides, specifically pseudouridine, on the multiple conformational states of helix 69 in the context of 50S subunits and 70S ribosomes, chemical probing analyses were performed on wild-type and pseudouridine-deficient bacterial ribosomes. Local structural rearrangements of helix 69 upon ribosomal subunit association and interactions with its partner, helix 44 of 16S rRNA, are observed. The helix 69 conformational states are also magnesium dependent. The probing data presented in this study provide insight into the functional role of helix 69 dynamics and regulation of these conformational states by post-transcriptional pseudouridine modification.

DNA-targeting agents, including cisplatin, bleomycin and mitomycin C, are used routinely in cancer treatments. However, these drugs are extremely toxic, attacking normal cells and causing severe side effects. One important question to consider in designing anticancer agents is whether the introduction of sequence selectivity to DNA-targeting agents can improve their efficacy as anticancer agents. In the present study, the growth inhibition activities of an indole-seco 1,2,9,9a-tetrahydrocyclopropa F rom recent research on the human genome, many diseases, including cancers and malignant lymphomas, are better understood at a genomic level. Thus, many areas of cancer science, such as diagnosis, treatment and prevention, are changing dramatically.(1) For instance, new anticancer agents that target mutated gene products are showing great promise, such as Glivec, which targets the Abelson leukemia viral oncogene kinase in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia.(2) DNA-targeting agents, such as cisplatin, bleomycin and mitomycin C, are used routinely in cancer treatment. However, these drugs are extremely toxic, attacking non-cancerous cells and inducing severe side effects. One important question to consider is whether the introduction of sequence selectivity to DNA-targeting agents can improve their efficacy as anticancer agents. To address this question, we have designed and synthesized a series of sequence-specific alkylating agents. N-methyl Py-Im hairpin polyamides bind in the minor groove of DNA, with antiparallel paired Im/Py uniquely recognizing G-C base pairs and Py/ Py pairs recognizing either A-T or T-A base pairs. (3,4) Duocarmycin A, a minor groove-binding antitumor antibiotic produced by Streptomyces spp., alkylates adenine N3 at the 3′ end of sequences of three or more consecutive A-T base pairs in DNA.(5-7) CBI is a synthetic analog of the alkylating moiety of duocarmycin A that has increased stability in aqueous solution.(8) Seco-CBI is a precursor of CBI, and in aqueous solution, seco-CBI derivatives change spontaneously to CBI derivatives. The mechanism of the formation of CBI from seco-CBI and the subsequent alkylation of DNA by CBI derivatives is shown in Fig. 1. We have demonstrated that hybrids between DNA-alkylating agents and Py-Im hairpin polyamides selectively alkylate at the matched sequences according to the recognition rules of the Py-Im polyamides. (9)(10)(11) In the present study, the growth inhibition of the alkylating moiety (1) itself with three-A-T base pair recognition, and conjugated compounds with various hairpin Py-Im polyamides (2-6) with six-base pair recognition were compared using 10 human and mouse cell lines. Materials and MethodsCell lines HLC2, HeLa, HEK293, WI38, NIH3T3 and M5S cell lines, which are human lung carcinoma, human cervical epithelial carcinoma, human kidney epithelial, human embryonic lung fibroblast, mouse fibroblast and mouse near-diploid fibroblast cell lines, respectively, were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% hea...

The movement of the small ribosomal subunit (30S) relative to the large ribosomal subunit (50S) during translation is widely known, but many molecular details and roles of ribosomal RNA and proteins in this process are still undefined, especially in solution models. The functional relationship of modified nucleotides to ribosome activity is one such enigma. To better understand ribosome dynamics and the influence of modified nucleotides on such processes, the focus of this work was helix 69 of 23S rRNA, which contains three pseudouridine residues in its loop region. Ribosome probing experiments with dimethylsulfate revealed that specific base accessibilities and individual nucleotide conformations in helix 69 are influenced differently by pH, temperature, magnesium, and the presence of pseudouridine modifications.

Loop conformation: The loop of the RNA domain helix 69 (H69) was modified with the fluorescent analogue 2‐aminopurine (2AP), thus showing different conformational states under various conditions. The application of this model RNA reveals the unique impact of aminoglycoside neomycin, which differs from the effects of structurally related compounds paromomycin and gentamicin, on the H69 loop conformation in solution (see picture).