IntroductionBacteremia is recognized as a critical condition that influences the outcome of sepsis. Although large-scale surveillance studies of bacterial species causing bacteremia have been published, the pathophysiological differences in bacteremias with different causative bacterial species remain unclear. The objective of the present study is to investigate the differences in pathophysiology and the clinical course of bacteremia caused by different bacterial species.MethodsWe reviewed the medical records of all consecutive patients admitted to the general intensive care unit (ICU) of a university teaching hospital during the eight-year period since introduction of a rapid assay for interleukin (IL)-6 blood level to routine ICU practice in May 2000. White blood cell count, C-reactive protein (CRP), IL-6 blood level, and clinical course were compared among different pathogenic bacterial species.ResultsThe 259 eligible patients, as well as 515 eligible culture-positive blood samples collected from them, were included in this study. CRP, IL-6 blood level, and mortality were significantly higher in the septic shock group (n = 57) than in the sepsis group (n = 127) (P < 0.001). The 515 eligible culture-positive blood samples harbored a total of 593 isolates of microorganisms (Gram-positive, 407; Gram-negative, 176; fungi, 10). The incidence of Gram-negative bacteremia was significantly higher in the septic shock group than in the sepsis group (P < 0.001) and in the severe sepsis group (n = 75, P < 0.01). CRP and IL-6 blood level were significantly higher in Gram-negative bacteremia (n = 176) than in Gram-positive bacteremia (n = 407) (P < 0.001, <0.0005, respectively).ConclusionsThe incidence of Gram-negative bacteremia was significantly higher in bacteremic ICU patients with septic shock than in those with sepsis or severe sepsis. Furthermore, CRP and IL-6 levels were significantly higher in Gram-negative bacteremia than in Gram-positive bacteremia. These findings suggest that differences in host responses and virulence mechanisms of different pathogenic microorganisms should be considered in treatment of bacteremic patients, and that new countermeasures beyond conventional antimicrobial medications are urgently needed.

IntroductionNeurological prognostic factors after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in patients with cardiac arrest (CA) as early and accurately as possible are urgently needed to determine therapeutic strategies after successful CPR. In particular, serum levels of protein neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and S-100B are considered promising candidates for neurological predictors, and many investigations on the clinical usefulness of these markers have been published. However, the design adopted varied from study to study, making a systematic literature review extremely difficult. The present review focuses on the following three respects for the study design: definitions of outcome, value of specificity and time points of blood sampling.MethodsA Medline search of literature published before August 2008 was performed using the following search terms: "NSE vs CA or CPR", "S100 vs CA or CPR". Publications examining the clinical usefulness of NSE or S-100B as a prognostic predictor in two outcome groups were reviewed. All publications met with inclusion criteria were classified into three groups with respect to the definitions of outcome; "dead or alive", "regained consciousness or remained comatose", and "return to independent daily life or not". The significance of differences between two outcome groups, cutoff values and predictive accuracy on each time points of blood sampling were investigated.ResultsA total of 54 papers were retrieved by the initial text search, and 24 were finally selected. In the three classified groups, most of the studies showed the significance of differences and concluded these biomarkers were useful for neurological predictor. However, in view of blood sampling points, the significance was not always detected. Nevertheless, only five studies involved uniform application of a blood sampling schedule with sampling intervals specified based on a set starting point. Specificity was not always set to 100%, therefore it is difficult to indiscriminately assess the cut-off values and its predictive accuracy of these biomarkers in this meta analysis.ConclusionsIn such circumstances, the findings of the present study should aid future investigators in examining the clinical usefulness of these markers and determination of cut-off values.

No abstract

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) has been extensively used in Japan as renal support for critically ill patients managed in the ICU. In Japan, active research has also been conducted on non-renal indications for CRRT, i.e. the use of CRRT for purposes other than renal support. Various methods of blood purification have been attempted to remove inflammatory mediators, such as cytokines, in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. In these attempts, efficacy was demonstrated for continuous hemodiafiltration(CHDF) using a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) membrane hemofilter which is capable of adsorbing and removing various cytokines, plasma diafiltration, and online CHDF. Furthermore, a recently developed cytokine-adsorbing column is now under clinical evaluation. Definite evidence for the efficacy of CRRT for non-renal indications has not been established. In evaluating the efficacy of CRRT for non-renal indications, it is essential to focus on patients subjected to be studied, such as severe sepsis or septic shock, and to evaluate its indication, commencement, termination of therapy and also its therapeutic effects based on analysis of blood levels of the target substances to be removed (e.g. cytokines). IL-6 blood level appears to be useful as a variable for this evaluation. It is expected that evidence endorsing the validity of these methods now being attempted in Japan will be reported near future.

Background/Aims: We sought to identify the most relevant hemofilter for cytokine removal based on the mechanisms of filtration and adsorption. Methods: Ascites were filtered using four types of hemofilters composed of different membrane materials (polymethyl methacrylate, PMMA, cellulose triacetate, CTA, or polysulfone, PS) and different surface areas (1.0 or 2.1 m²) to investigate the rate of interleukin-6 (IL-6) filtration. Next, ascites were perfused through each hemofilter without obtaining a filtrate to study each filter’s adsorptive capability. Results: The PMMA hemofilters resulted in a marginal observed IL-6 filtration rates, whereas the CTA and PS hemofilters resulted in highly effective IL-6 filtration. Regarding the IL-6 adsorptive capabilities of the filters, the PMMA hemofilter with a large surface area showed the highest level of IL-6 clearance. Conclusion: The present findings suggest that when cytokine removal based on filtration is desired, CTA or PS hemofilters should be selected. When IL-6 removal based on adsorption is desired, a PMMA hemofilter with a large surface area should be selected.