First-principles calculations were performed to investigate the electrochemical stability of lithium solid electrolyte materials in all-solid-state Li-ion batteries. The common solid electrolytes were found to have a limited electrochemical window. Our results suggest that the outstanding stability of the solid electrolyte materials is not thermodynamically intrinsic but is originated from kinetic stabilizations. The sluggish kinetics of the decomposition reactions cause a high overpotential leading to a nominally wide electrochemical window observed in many experiments. The decomposition products, similar to the solid-electrolyte-interphases, mitigate the extreme chemical potential from the electrodes and protect the solid electrolyte from further decompositions. With the aid of the first-principles calculations, we revealed the passivation mechanism of these decomposition interphases and quantified the extensions of the electrochemical window from the interphases. We also found that the artificial coating layers applied at the solid electrolyte and electrode interfaces have a similar effect of passivating the solid electrolyte. Our newly gained understanding provided general principles for developing solid electrolyte materials with enhanced stability and for engineering interfaces in all-solid-state Li-ion batteries.

This study provides the understanding and design strategy of solid electrolyte–electrode interfaces to improve electrochemical performance of all-solid-state Li-ion batteries.

Super-ionic conductor materials have great potential to enable novel technologies in energy storage and conversion. However, it is not yet understood why only a few materials can deliver exceptionally higher ionic conductivity than typical solids or how one can design fast ion conductors following simple principles. Using ab initio modelling, here we show that fast diffusion in super-ionic conductors does not occur through isolated ion hopping as is typical in solids, but instead proceeds through concerted migrations of multiple ions with low energy barriers. Furthermore, we elucidate that the low energy barriers of the concerted ionic diffusion are a result of unique mobile ion configurations and strong mobile ion interactions in super-ionic conductors. Our results provide a general framework and universal strategy to design solid materials with fast ionic diffusion.

electrochemical stability window, and (3) chemical compatibility with the anode and cathode. In the past few years, major advances have been achieved in increasing the Li ionic conductivity of the solid electrolytes. The state-of-the-art solid electrolyte materials, such as Li-garnet Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 (LLZO) and Li 10 GeP 2 S 12 (LGPS) have achieved an ionic conductivity of 10 −3 to 10 −2 S cm −1 , [ 1,2 ] which are comparable to commercial organic liquid electrolytes. The high ionic conductivity in solid electrolytes has ignited the research of all-solid-state Li-ion batteries. After achieving adequate Li ionic conductivity in the solid electrolyte materials, current research efforts turned to enhancing the electrochemical stability of the solid electrolytes and chemical compatibility between the solid electrolytes and electrodes, so that Li metal anode and high voltage cathode materials can achieve higher energy density in all-solid-state Li-ion batteries. To enable the highest voltage output of the solid-state battery by coupling a lithium metal anode with a high voltage cathode material, a very wide electrochemical stability window (0.0-5.0 V) is desired for an ideal solid electrolyte. The electrochemical stability window of solid electrolyte was typically obtained by applying the linear polarization on the Li/solid electrolyte/ inert metal (e.g., Pt) semiblocking electrode. Tested by this method, very wide electrochemical stability windows of 0.0 to 5.0 V were reported for both LGPS and LLZO. [ 2,3 ] However, the electrochemical performances of the bulk-type all-solid-state battery batteries assembled with these solid electrolytes [ 2,4 ] are far worse than the liquid-electrolyte based batteries even though the solid electrolyte has a comparable ionic conductivity to the liquid electrolyte. The high interfacial resistance is often blamed as the main limiting factor for the performance of the solid state battery. [ 5 ] The origin of the interfacial resistance, though still not fully understood, is often attributed to the poor physical interfacial contact, the formation of space charge layers, [ 6 ] and/or the formation of interphase layers due to the chemical reactions between the electrolyte and electrode. [ 7 ] Although a variety of interfacial processing techniques, such as dynamic pressing, [ 8 ] nanosizing, [ 9 ] cosintering, [ 10 ] screen printing, [ 11 ] surface coatings [ 12,13 ] have been attempted to engineer the interfaces between the electrodes and electrolytes, the performances of the solid-state battery are still much lower than the liquidelectrolyte based batteries. The limited electrochemical stabilityThe electrochemical stability window of solid electrolyte is overestimated by the conventional experimental method using a Li/electrolyte/inert metal semiblocking electrode because of the limited contact area between solid electrolyte and inert metal. Since the battery is cycled in the overestimated stability window, the decomposition of the solid electrolyte at the interfaces occurs but has be...

Strategy to change the wettability of the solid-state electrolyte against Li and reduce interface resistance.

All-solid-state Li-batteries using solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) offer enhanced safety over conventional Li-ion batteries with organic liquid electrolytes due to the nonflammable nature of SSEs. The superior mechanical strength of SSEs can also protect against Li dendrite penetration, which enables the use of the highest specific capacity (3861 mAh/g) and lowest redox potential (-3.04 V vs standard hydrogen electrode) anode: Li metal. However, contact between the Li metal and SSEs presents a major challenge, where a large polarization occurs at the Li metal/SSE interface. Here, the chemical properties of a promising oxide-based SSE (garnet) changed from "super-lithiophobicity" to "super-lithiophilicity" through an ultrathin coating of amorphous Si deposited by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD). The wettability transition is due to the reaction between Li and Si and the in situ formation of lithiated Si. As a result, symmetric cells composed of a Si-coated garnet-structured SSE and Li metal electrodes exhibited much smaller impedance and excellent stability upon plating/stripping cycles compared to cells using bare garnet SSE. Specifically, the interfacial resistance between Li and garnet dramatically decreased from 925 to 127 Ω cm(2) when lithiated Si was formed on the garnet. Our discovery of switchable lithiophobic-lithiophilic surfaces to improve the Li metal/SSE interface opens opportunities for improving many other SSEs.

Substantial efforts are underway to develop all-solid-state Li batteries (SSLiBs) toward high safety, high power density, and high energy density. Garnet-structured solid-state electrolyte exhibits great promise for SSLiBs owing to its high Li-ion conductivity, wide potential window, and sufficient thermal/chemical stability. A major challenge of garnet is that the contact between the garnet and the Li-metal anodes is poor due to the rigidity of the garnet, which leads to limited active sites and large interfacial resistance. This study proposes a new methodology for reducing the garnet/Li-metal interfacial resistance by depositing a thin germanium (Ge) (20 nm) layer on garnet. By applying this approach, the garnet/Li-metal interfacial resistance decreases from ≈900 to ≈115 Ω cm due to an alloying reaction between the Li metal and the Ge. In agreement with experiments, first-principles calculation confirms the good stability and improved wetting at the interface between the lithiated Ge layer and garnet. In this way, this unique Ge modification technique enables a stable cycling performance of a full cell of lithium metal, garnet electrolyte, and LiFePO cathode at room temperature.

Ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulation is widely employed in studying diffusion mechanisms and in quantifying diffusional properties of materials. However, AIMD simulations are often limited to a few hundred atoms and a short, sub-nanosecond physical timescale, which leads to models that include only a limited number of diffusion events. As a result, the diffusional properties obtained from AIMD simulations are often plagued by poor statistics. In this paper, we reexamine the process to estimate diffusivity and ionic conductivity from the AIMD simulations and establish the procedure to minimize the fitting errors. In addition, we propose methods for quantifying the statistical variance of the diffusivity and ionic conductivity from the number of diffusion events observed during the AIMD simulation. Since an adequate number of diffusion events must be sampled, AIMD simulations should be sufficiently long and can only be performed on materials with reasonably fast diffusion. We chart the ranges of materials and physical conditions that can be accessible by AIMD simulations in studying diffusional properties. Our work provides the foundation for quantifying the statistical confidence levels of diffusion results from AIMD simulations and for correctly employing this powerful technique.