53BP1 with its downstream proteins, RIF1, PTIP and REV7, antagonizes BRCA1-dependent homologous recombination (HR) and promotes non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) in an unclear manner. Here we show that REV7 forms a complex with two proteins, FAM35A and C20ORF196. We demonstrate that FAM35A preferentially binds single-strand DNA (ssDNA) in vitro, and is recruited to DSBs as a complex with C20ORF196 and REV7 downstream of RIF1 in vivo. Epistasis analysis shows that both proteins act in the same pathway as RIF1 in NHEJ. The defects in HR pathway to repair DSBs and the reduction in resection of broken DNA ends in BRCA1-mutant cells can be largely suppressed by inactivating FAM35A or C20ORF196, indicating that FAM35A and C20ORF196 prevent end resection in these cells. Together, our data identified a REV7–FAM35A–C20ORF196 complex that binds and protects broken DNA ends to promote the NHEJ pathway for DSB repair.

The cellular pathways that restart stalled replication forks are essential for genome stability and tumor prevention. However, how many of these pathways exist in cells and how these pathways are selectively activated remain unclear. Here, we describe two major fork restart pathways, and demonstrate that their selection is governed by 53BP1 and BRCA1, which are known to control the pathway choice to repair double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs). Specifically, 53BP1 promotes a fork cleavage-free pathway, whereas BRCA1 facilitates a break-induced replication (BIR) pathway coupled with SLX-MUS complex-mediated fork cleavage. The defect in the first pathway, but not DSB repair, in a 53BP1 mutant is largely corrected by disrupting BRCA1, and vice versa. Moreover, PLK1 temporally regulates the switch of these two pathways through enhancing the assembly of the SLX-MUS complex. Our results reveal two distinct fork restart pathways, which are antagonistically controlled by 53BP1 and BRCA1 in a DSB repair-independent manner.

The replication protein A (RPA) complex binds singlestranded DNA generated at stalled replication forks and recruits other DNA repair proteins to promote recovery of these forks. Here, we identify Ewing tumor-associated antigen 1 (ETAA1), which has been linked to susceptibility to pancreatic cancer, as a new repair protein that is recruited to stalled forks by RPA. We demonstrate that ETAA1 interacts with RPA through two regions, each of which resembles two previously identified RPA-binding domains, RPA70N-binding motif and RPA32C-binding motif, respectively. In response to replication stress, ETAA1 is recruited to stalled forks where it colocalizes with RPA, and this recruitment is diminished when RPA is depleted. Notably, inactivation of the ETAA1 gene increases the collapse level of the stalled replication forks and decreases the recovery efficiency of these forks. Moreover, epistasis analysis shows that ETAA1 stabilizes stalled replication forks in an ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein (ATR)-independent manner. Thus, our results reveal that ETAA1 is a novel RPA-interacting protein that promotes restart of stalled replication forks.The faithful replication of DNA is essential for the maintenance of genomic stability and the prevention of cancerpromoting mutations. Replication forks can be stalled by numerous obstacles on the DNA template, including unrepaired DNA damage, DNA-bound proteins, and secondary structures (1). Stalled replication forks are able to restart once the obstacles are removed or become broken (collapse) into DNA double strand breaks, which pose the most serious threat to genome integrity when fork protection fails (2, 3). However, how stalled replication forks are protected is not well understood.The replication protein A (RPA) 3 complex, which consists of RPA1 (RPA70), RPA2 (RPA32), and RPA3 (RPA14), plays crucial roles in a variety of DNA metabolic pathways, including DNA replication, recombination, repair, and DNA damage checkpoint (4 -6). When replication forks stalled, singlestranded DNA (ssDNA) is generated and extended by minichromosome maintenance protein complex helicases (7,8). The ssDNA is bound by RPA, which protects ssDNA from cleavage by nucleases and recruits repair proteins to initiate DNA damage responses. The RPA-ssDNA complex recruits and activates ATR/ATRIP thereby eliciting checkpoint signaling (9). In addition, RPA-ssDNA complex also recruits factors necessary for the stabilization and resumption of stalled replication forks, such as RAD51 (10, 11) and SMARCAL1 (12-15). Recently, several studies have also revealed a physical and functional interaction between RPA and the ubiquitin E3 ligases RFWD3 (16 -18) and PRP19 (19), which ubiquitinate RPA and facilitate replication fork restart. Here, we identified a new RPA interaction protein, ETAA1, whose gene variation has been associated with susceptibility to pancreatic cancer (20). ETAA1 is recruited to stalled replication forks in response to replication stress, and the disruption of ETAA1 leads to fork colla...

The MRE11–RAD50–NBS1 (MRN) complex is well known for participating in DNA damage response pathways in all phases of cell cycle. Here, we show that MRN constitutes a mitosis-specific complex, named mMRN, with a protein, MMAP. MMAP directly interacts with MRE11 and is required for optimal stability of the MRN complex during mitosis. MMAP colocalizes with MRN in mitotic spindles, and MMAP-deficient cells display abnormal spindle dynamics and chromosome segregation similar to MRN-deficient cells. Mechanistically, both MMAP and MRE11 are hyperphosphorylated by the mitotic kinase, PLK1; and the phosphorylation is required for assembly of the mMRN complex. The assembled mMRN complex enables PLK1 to interact with and activate the microtubule depolymerase, KIF2A, leading to spindle turnover and chromosome segregation. Our study identifies a mitosis-specific version of the MRN complex that acts in the PLK1–KIF2A signaling cascade to regulate spindle dynamics and chromosome distribution.

No abstract

Abstract Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is at a constant risk of damage from endogenous substances, environmental radiation, and chemical stressors. DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) pose a significant threat to genomic integrity and cell survival. There are two major pathways for DSB repair: nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR). The extent of DNA end resection, which determines the length of the 3′ single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) overhang, is the primary factor that determines whether repair is carried out via NHEJ or HR. NHEJ, which does not require a 3′ ssDNA tail, occurs throughout the cell cycle. 53BP1 and the cofactors PTIP or RIF1-shieldin protect the broken DNA end, inhibit long-range end resection and thus promote NHEJ. In contrast, HR mainly occurs during the S/G2 phase and requires DNA end processing to create a 3′ tail that can invade a homologous region, ensuring faithful gene repair. BRCA1 and the cofactors CtIP, EXO1, BLM/DNA2, and the MRE11–RAD50–NBS1 (MRN) complex promote DNA end resection and thus HR. DNA resection is influenced by the cell cycle, the chromatin environment, and the complexity of the DNA end break. Herein, we summarize the key factors involved in repair pathway selection for DSBs and discuss recent related publications.

No abstract