Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of laparoscopic tubal anastomosis for tubal occlusions associated with infertility in patients with previous laparoscopic salpingostomy for ectopic pregnancy. Methods This study is a retrospective analysis of the pregnancy outcomes of 173 infertile patients who underwent hysteroscopy and laparoscopic tubal anastomosis treatment between January 2013 and August 2018 in the Department of Reproductive Endocrinology in West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University. All patients had a history of laparoscopic salpingostomy for tubal pregnancy. The primary outcomes were intrauterine pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, and delivery rates. We further studied the associated factors that could influence the change in pregnancy status. Results The 24‐month cumulative clinical pregnancy rate of all patients was 107/173 (61.8%). The distribution of outcomes for the entire group of pregnancies was as follows: intrauterine pregnancy rate, 76/173 (43.9%); ectopic pregnancy rate, 31/173 (17.9%); delivery rate, 68/173 (39.3%); and miscarriage rate, 8/173 (4.6%). Age, type of anastomosis, hydrosalpinx, and endometrial polyps were significant prognostic factors in the multivariate model. Conclusion Laparoscopic tubal anastomosis is an effective treatment for tubal‐associated infertility due to previous laparoscopic salpingostomy for ectopic pregnancy, especially for women under 35 years of age.
Background: The infertile patients with endometriosis had a higher prevalence of endometrial polyps. The effect of endometrial polyps on pregnancy outcomes in endometriosis-associated infertility patients is unclear. This study assessed the pregnancy outcomes and associated influencing factors of pregnancy after hysteroscopy combined with laparoscopy treatment in infertile patients with minimal/mild endometriosis. Methods: We enrolled 898 infertile women who underwent both hysteroscopy and laparoscopy treatment. Based on the existence of endometrial polyps confirmed by hysteroscopy and pathologic examination, patients were divided into polyps group and non-polyps group, and their pregnancy outcomes were compared. Results: After removal of 136 subjects who were lost to follow-up, underwent assisted reproduction techniques, or postponed plans to become pregnant. A total of 271 women were included in polyps group and 491 in non-polyps group. The pregnancy rate of polyps group was not statistically significant compared with non-polyp group (60.15% VS. 58.25%). The pregnancy rate was higher among patients with polyps ≥ 1 cm (76.06%, 54/71) than patients with polyps < 1 cm (54.50%, 109/200) or patients without polyps (58.25%, 286/491) (p = 0.006). The pregnancy rate was higher for patients with multiple polyps (67.86%, 95/140) than for patients with single polyp (51.91%, 68/131) or without polyps (p = 0.025). Conclusions: Compared with those without endometrial polyps, single polyp, and size of polyp < 1 cm, hysteroscopic polypectomy did significantly increase fertility in infertile patients with multiple polyps or size of polyp ≥ 1cm. The size and number of polyps were independently associated with the reproductive ability of women with minimal/mild endometriosis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.