No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Background: Spinal cord injury (SCI) leads to severe physical disability and sensory dysfunction. Neurotropin (NTP) has been used clinically to alleviate neuropathic pain, while nafamostat mesylate (NM) used clinical on pancreatitis patients through inhibiting synthetic serine protease. Our previous studies showed that NTP and NM were able to repair SCI. However, the underlying mechanism has not been fully explored after treatment with these 2 different drugs. Methods:The drugs NTP and NM were administered on a contusion SCI Wistar rat model. Cytokine array analysis was performed to describe the changes of 67 proteins after acute SCI. Hierarchical clustering and volcano plot analysis were conducted to clarify protein change profiles. The differently expressed proteins related to biological processes were analyzed by functional protein association networks, Gene Ontology and pathway analysis. Flow cytometric analysis was detected to reflect the activation of immune system after drug intervention, while withdrawal threshold and BBB score were detected to evaluated the mechanical allodynia and functional recovery after SCI.Results: HGF, β-NGF, and activin were the 3 most upregulated proteins, while the receptor for RAGE, IL-1α, and TNF-α were the 3 most downregulated proteins after NTP treatment. Adiponectin, decorin and CTACK were the 3 most upregulated proteins, while RAGE, IL-1α, and IL-1β were the 3 most downregulated proteins in the NM group. Number of lymphocytes was decreased while BBB score was increased both in NTP and NM group. But only NTP could improve mechanical pain threshold after SCI. Conclusions:The PI3K-Akt, Jak-STAT signaling pathway and apoptosis might participate in SCI restoration by NTP, while the MAPK and NOD-like receptor signaling pathway may participated in repairing SCI with NM. We concluded that NTP regulated the microenvironment via a neuroprotective effect and inhibition of inflammation to repair SCI, while NM healed SCI through an anti-inflammatory effect. Both NTP and NM could down-regulate the activation of immune system and improve the functional recovery while only NTP could improve the pathological neuralgia after SCI. Elucidating the molecular mechanisms of these 2 clinical drugs indicates that they their expected to be effective clinical treatment for SCI.

Background Nafamostat mesylate (nafamostat, NM) is an FDA-approved serine protease inhibitor that exerts anti-neuroinflammation and neuroprotective effects following rat spinal cord injury (SCI). However, clinical translation of nafamostat has been limited by an unclear administration time window and mechanism of action. Methods Time to first dose of nafamostat administration was tested on rats after contusive SCI. The optimal time window of nafamostat was screened by evaluating hindlimb locomotion and electrophysiology. As nafamostat is a serine protease inhibitor known to target thrombin, we used argatroban (Arg), a thrombin-specific inhibitor, as a positive control in the time window experiments. Western blot and immunofluorescence of thrombin expression level and its enzymatic activity were assayed at different time points, as well its receptor, the protease activated receptor 1 (PAR1) and downstream protein matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP9). Blood–spinal cord barrier (BSCB) permeability leakage indicator Evans Blue and fibrinogen were analyzed along these time points. The infiltration of peripheral inflammatory cell was observed by immunofluorescence. Results The optimal administration time window of nafamostat was 2–12 h post-injury. Argatroban, the thrombin-specific inhibitor, had a similar pattern. Thrombin expression peaked at 12 h and returned to normal level at 7 days post-SCI. PAR1, the thrombin receptor, and MMP9 were significantly upregulated after SCI. The most significant increase of thrombin expression was detected in vascular endothelial cells (ECs). Nafamostat and argatroban significantly downregulated thrombin and MMP9 expression as well as thrombin activity in the spinal cord. Nafamostat inhibited thrombin enrichment in endothelial cells. Nafamostat administration at 2–12 h after SCI inhibited the leakage of Evans Blue in the epicenter and upregulated tight junction proteins (TJPs) expression. Nafamostat administration 8 h post-SCI effectively inhibited the infiltration of peripheral macrophages and neutrophils to the injury site. Conclusions Our study provides preclinical information of nafamostat about the administration time window of 2–12 h post-injury in contusive SCI. We revealed that nafamostat functions through inhibiting the thrombin-mediated BSCB breakdown and subsequent peripheral immune cells infiltration.

The FDA-approved drug edaravone has a neuroprotective effect on spinal cord injury (SCI) and many other central nervous system diseases. However, its molecular mechanism remains unclear. Since edaravone is a lipid peroxidation scavenger, we hypothesize that edaravone exerts its neuroprotective effect by inhibiting ferroptosis in SCI. Edaravone treatment after SCI upregulates glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) and system Xc-light chain (xCT), which are anti-ferroptosis proteins. It downregulates pro-ferroptosis proteins Acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 4 (ACSL4) and 5-lipoxygenase (5-LOX). The most significant changes in edaravone treatment occur in the acute phase, two days post injury. Edaravone modulates neuronal GPX4/ACSL4/5-LOX in the spinal segment below the lesion, which is critical for maintaining locomotion. Moreover, the GPX4/ACSL4/5-LOX in motor neuron is also modulated by edaravone in the spinal cord. Therefore, secondary injury below the lesion site is reversed by edaravone via ferroptosis inhibition. The cytokine array revealed that edaravone upregulated some anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10, IL-13, and adiponectin. Edaravone reduced microgliosis and astrogliosis, indicating reduced neuroinflammation. Edaravone has a long-term effect on neuronal survival, spinal cord tissue sparing, and motor function recovery. In summary, we revealed a novel mechanism of edaravone in inhibiting neuronal ferroptosis in SCI. This mechanism may be generalizable to other neurological diseases.

Background: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a serious condition that can cause physical disability and sensory dysfunction. Cytokines play an extremely important role in the acute phase of SCI. Clarifying the cytokine expression profile is of great importance.Methods: Cytokine array analysis was used to explore the changes in 67 different proteins at 0 hours, 2 hours, 1 day, 3 days, and 7 days after acute SCI in rats. The differentially expressed cytokines in the various periods were analyzed and compared. The biological processes related to the differentially expressed proteins were examined using Gene Ontology (GO) analysis.Results: Immediately after SCI (0 hours), only ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) was slightly upregulated, while 23 other proteins were down-regulated. At 2 hours after SCI, there were 3 upregulated and 21 downregulated proteins. At 1 day after SCI, there were 5 upregulated and 6 downregulated proteins.At 3 days after SCI, there were 6 upregulated and 4 downregulated proteins. At 7 days after SCI, there were 4 upregulated and 9 downregulated proteins. Erythropoietin (EPO) and Fms related tyrosine kinase 3 ligand (Flt-3L) were downregulated at all time points. CD48 was decreased at 2 hours to 7 days after SCI.Monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) was the only protein that was upregulated at 2 hours to 7 days.The GO and pathway analyses revealed that the cytokine-related pathways, cell death, and proliferation might play a key role during secondary SCI.Conclusions: This study identified 3 downregulated proteins during SCI, that being EPO, Flt-3L, and CD48. MCP-1 was the only upregulated protein, and its expression was upregulated till day 7 following SCI. These 4 identified genes may be potential therapeutic targets for the treatment of SCI.

Background: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a traumatic disease that is associated with high morbidity, disability, and mortality worldwide. The animal spinal cord contusion model is similar to clinical SCI; therefore, this model is often used to study the pathophysiological changes and treatment strategies for humans after SCI. The present study aimed to introduce a novel, minimally invasive technique to establish an SCI model, and to evaluate its advantages compared with conventional methods.Methods: Incision length, blood loss, length of time, and model success rate during the operation were recorded. Postoperative hematuria, incision hematoma, scoliosis [detected by micro computed tomography (Micro-CT)] and mortality were analyzed to evaluate surgical complications. The visual observation of the tissue was used to compare the effect of laminectomy by 2 methods on the scar hyperplasia at the injured site. Basso-Beattie-Bresnahan (BBB) score and catwalk automated quantitative gait analysis were conducted to measure behavioral function recovery. To evaluate the nerve function recovery of rats postoperatively, somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) and motor evoked potential (MEP) were studied by electrophysiological analyses. Results:The results of operation-related parameters of the two models (conventional surgery group vs. minimally invasive surgery group) were as follows: surgical incision length: 23.58±1.58 versus 12.67±1.50 mm (P<0.05), blood loss: 3.96±1.05 versus 1.34±0.87 mL (P<0.05), and total operative time: 12.67±1.78 versus 10.33±1.92 min (P<0.05). In addition, the success rate of the 2 models was 100%. Surgical complications (conventional surgery group vs. minimally invasive surgery group) were as follows: hematuria: 25% versus 8.3%, kyphosis: 25% versus 0%, incision hematoma: 30% versus 9%, and mortality: 25% versus 8.3%.Micro-CT indicated severe scoliosis in the conventional surgery group. Gross tissue results showed that the conventional surgery group had more severe fibrous scar hyperplasia. The results of the BBB scores, catwalk automated quantitative gait analysis, and electrophysiology showed that the difference between the two groups was statistically significant in terms of behavioral recovery and neuroelectrophysiology. Conclusions:The minimally invasive technique has the advantages of small incision and reduced tissue damage and surgical complications, and may be used as an alternative spinal cord contusion method.