Living donor liver transplantation is now a common practice in countries in which the availability of cadaveric organs is limited. The preoperative preparation, intraoperative surgical technique, and postoperative care of donors and recipients have evolved in recent years. We retrospectively compared 67 donors with a remnant liver volume equal to or more than 30% (group 1) with 14 donors who had less than 30% remnant liver volume (group 2) for donor outcomes. All the complications in donors were systematically classified. Donors with less than 30% remnant liver volume showed significantly higher peak aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, international normalized ratio, and bilirubin levels. There were 6 complications in group 1 and 4 complications in group 2. The difference between the 2 groups in terms of donor complications did reach statistical significance (P ϭ 0.043); donors with a remnant liver volume Ͻ 30% had a 4 times greater relative risk of morbidity.In conclusion, the use of donors with less than 30% remnant liver volume is highly debatable as donor safety should be of utmost importance in living donor liver transplantation. Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is now an accepted treatment modality for end-stage liver disease. It has become an alternative in the era of organ shortage. This procedure is possible because of the segmental structure of the liver and the regeneration potential of the transplanted and remnant parts. After years of extensive experience in adult-to-child left-lobe liver transplantation, right donor hepatectomy has become a common practice in centers performing adult-to-adult LDLT. Despite impressive results, right-lobe LDLT involves one of the most complicated and technically demanding surgical procedures and has created considerable controversy with respect to donor safety. To date, there have been 17 donor deaths reported, and the morbidity is reported to be in the range of 20% to 30%.

An accepted definition of donor exclusion criteria has not been established for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The use of elderly donors to expand the living donor pool raises ethical concerns about donor safety. The aims of this study were (1) the comparison of the postoperative outcomes of living liver donors by age (!50 versus <50 years) and (2) the evaluation of the impact of the extent of right hepatectomy on donor outcomes. The study group included 150 donors who underwent donor right hepatectomy between October 2004 and April 2009. Extended criteria surgery (ECS) was defined as right hepatectomy with middle hepatic vein (MHV) harvesting or right hepatectomy resulting in an estimated remnant liver volume (RLV) less than 35%. The primary endpoints were donor outcomes in terms of donor complications graded according to the Clavien classification. Group 1 consisted of donors who were 50 years old or older (n ¼ 28), and group 2 consisted of donors who were less than 50 years old (n ¼ 122). At least 1 ECS criterion was present in 74% of donors: 57% had 1 criterion, and 17% had 2 criteria. None of the donors had grade 4 complications or died. The overall and major complication rates were similar in the 2 donor age groups [28.6% and 14.3% in group 1 and 32% and 8.2% in group 2 for the overall complication rates (P ¼ 0.8) and the major complication rates (P ¼ 0.2), respectively]. However, there was a significant correlation between the rate of major complications and the type of surgery in donors who were 50 years old or older. In LDLT, extending the limits of surgery comes at the price of more complications in elderly donors. Right hepatectomy with MHV harvesting and any procedure causing an RLV less than 35% should be avoided in living liver donors who are 50 years old or older.

The graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) is an important selection criterion for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The generally accepted threshold is known to be 0.8%. We believe that this threshold can be reduced under certain conditions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of these patients with GRWR < 0.8%. Between 2004 and 2015, 649 patients underwent right lobe LDLT for end-stage liver disease in adult patients. All recipients who had GRWR < 0.8% were identified. The data of these patients were retrospectively analyzed and compared to patients with GRWR ≥ 0.8%. There were 43 patients with GRWR < 0.8%. Out of these patients, 7 (16%) had GRWR of 0.6%. The median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was 15, and the median donor age was 30 years. Anterior segment drainage was ensured. Portal inflow modulation was performed by splenic artery ligation according to the portal flow. Postoperative complications were seen in 6 (14%) patients. Of all 43 patients, 3 (7%) died perioperatively within 1 month, and 1 (2%) patient underwent retransplantation due to graft failure. The mean hospital stay was 18 days. The 1-year survival rate was 93%. None of the patients had a laboratory MELD score above 20. The comparison of the results with the patients who had GRWR ≥ 0.8% has shown no significant difference, except MELD score, body mass index (BMI), and rate of anterior segment drainage. The GRWR can be decreased even to 0.6% if the MELD score is below 20, donor age is below 45 years, and there are no signs for any hepatosteatosis of the donor graft. In these patients, it is essential that the anterior segment drainage is secured and the portal inflow modulation is performed according to the portal flow. Liver Transplantation 22 1643-1648 2016 AASLD.

Remnant volume in a right lobe living donor hepatectomy has adverse effects on donor outcomes when RLV/TLV is ≤30% independent from the rate of RLV/BWR with a cut-off point of 0.6.

Summary The harvesting of the middle hepatic vein (MHV) with the right lobe graft for living‐donor liver transplantation allows an optimal venous drainage for the recipient; however, it is an extensive operation for the donor. This is a prospective, nonrandomized study evaluating liver functions and early clinical outcome in donors undergoing right hepatectomy with or without MHV harvesting. From August 2005 to July 2007, a total of 100 donor right hepatectomies were performed with (n = 49) or without (n = 51) the inclusion of the MHV. The decision to take MHV was based on an algorithm that considers various donor and recipient factors. There was no donor mortality in donors in either group. Overall complication rate was higher in MHV (+) donor group, however when remnant liver volume was kept above 30%, complication rates were similar between the groups. The results of this study show that right hepatectomy including the MHV neither affects morbidity nor impairs early liver function in donors when remnant volume is kept above 30%. The decision, therefore, of the extent of right lobe donor hepatectomy should be tailored to the particular conditions considering the graft quality and metabolic demand of the recipient.