The challenge is to develop strategies to identify men in need. Interventions are needed to help men reduce their number of sexual partners, occurrences of unprotected anal intercourse, alcohol or drug use before sex and address other mental health issues.

No abstract

Prior reports associating substance use with sexual risk behavior have generally used summary measures and have not adjusted for participants' background levels of substance use. In this 1999-2001 US study (the EXPLORE study), the authors determined whether substance use during sex was independently associated with sexual risk during recent sexual episodes, as reported by 4,295 human immunodeficiency virus-negative men who have sex with men. The main outcome measure was serodiscordant unprotected anal sex (SDUA). The influence of participant-level characteristics was examined by using repeated-measures logistic models. In assessing the influence of episode-level predictors on SDUA, the influence of participant-level characteristics, including 6-month substance use, was removed by using conditional logistic regression, in effect making each participant his own control. The authors also adjusted for partner characteristics. Eleven percent of participants reported heavy alcohol use, 37% used poppers, 19% sniffed cocaine, and 13% used amphetamines. In the participant-level analysis, use of poppers, amphetamines, and sniffed cocaine as well as heavy alcohol use in the prior 6 months were independently associated with SDUA. In the conditional analysis, consumption of > or = 6 alcoholic drinks or use of poppers, amphetamines, or sniffed cocaine just before or during sex was independently associated with SDUA. The authors concluded that programs aimed at preventing human immunodeficiency virus transmission should emphasize the influence of substance use during sex on increased risk behavior.

Our findings support the continued need for effective intervention strategies for MSM that address relationship status, serostatus of partners, and drug and alcohol use.

No abstract

Little is known about survival and hospitalization among alternative-regimen hemodialysis (HD) users compared to thrice-weekly conventional HD patients who have similar characteristics and medical histories. We conducted a cohort study of alternative-regimen HD users and propensity score (PS)-matched controls. Collaborating clinicians identified 101 patients in their programs who used nocturnal HD (NHD) and 44 patients who used short daily HD (SDHD) for 60 days or more. Ten PS-matched control patients for each NHD and SDHD patient were identified from the United States Renal Data System database. Primary outcomes were risk for all-cause mortality and risk for the composite outcome of mortality or major morbid event (AMI or stroke), investigated in Cox proportional hazards models. Risks for all-cause, cardiovascular-related, infection-related, and vascular access-related hospital admissions were also explored. NHD was associated with reduced mortality risk (HR 0.34; 95% CI, 0.21-0.58; P < 0.0001) and with reduced risk for mortality or major morbid event (HR 0.49; 95% CI, 0.31-0.78; P = 0.003) compared to controls. There was a reduced but non-significant risk of death for patients using SDHD compared to controls (HR 0.61; 95% CI, 0.30-1.24; P = 0.17). All-cause and specific hospitalizations did not differ significantly between NHD and SDHD patients and their matched control cohorts. This study provides additional evidence that NHD may improve patient survival.

No abstract

No abstract