Extrachromosomal circular DNA (eccDNA) is a type of double-stranded circular DNA that is derived and free from chromosomes. It has a strong heterogeneity in sequence, length, and origin and has been identified in both normal and cancer cells. Although many studies suggested its potential roles in various physiological and pathological procedures including aging, telomere and rDNA maintenance, drug resistance, and tumorigenesis, the functional relevance of eccDNA remains to be elucidated. Recently, due to technological advancements, accumulated evidence highlighted that eccDNA plays an important role in cancers by regulating the expression of oncogenes, chromosome accessibility, genome replication, immune response, and cellular communications. Here, we review the features, biogenesis, physiological functions, potential functions in cancer, and research methods of eccDNAs with a focus on some open problems in the field and provide a perspective on how eccDNAs evolve specific functions out of the chaos in cells.
BackgroundSeveral models have been developed for prediction of contrast‐induced nephropathy (CIN); however, they only contain patients receiving intra‐arterial contrast media for coronary angiographic procedures, which represent a small proportion of all contrast procedures. In addition, most of them evaluate radiological interventional procedure‐related variables. So it is necessary for us to develop a model for prediction of CIN before radiological procedures among patients administered contrast media.Methods and ResultsA total of 8800 patients undergoing contrast administration were randomly assigned in a 4:1 ratio to development and validation data sets. CIN was defined as an increase of 25% and/or 0.5 mg/dL in serum creatinine within 72 hours above the baseline value. Preprocedural clinical variables were used to develop the prediction model from the training data set by the machine learning method of random forest, and 5‐fold cross‐validation was used to evaluate the prediction accuracies of the model. Finally we tested this model in the validation data set. The incidence of CIN was 13.38%. We built a prediction model with 13 preprocedural variables selected from 83 variables. The model obtained an area under the receiver‐operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.907 and gave prediction accuracy of 80.8%, sensitivity of 82.7%, specificity of 78.8%, and Matthews correlation coefficient of 61.5%. For the first time, 3 new factors are included in the model: the decreased sodium concentration, the INR value, and the preprocedural glucose level.ConclusionsThe newly established model shows excellent predictive ability of CIN development and thereby provides preventative measures for CIN.
Background:The purpose of this study was to investigate whether robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty (RATHA) is superior to conventional total hip arthroplasty (CTHA) in terms of radiological and clinical outcomes. Methods: Three databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase) were searched for articles published before 11 May 2021. The comparison outcomes of interest included radiological and clinical outcomes.Results: Eighteen studies involving 2845 hips that compared the radiological and clinical outcomes of RATHA and CTHA were included in this study. There was no significant difference between RATHA and CTHA in cup anteversion or complications. However, RATHA showed better outcomes in terms of leg-length discrepancy, stem alignment, cup inclination, the Lewinnek safe zone, Callanan safe zone, total complications, and intraoperative complications. Robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty was inferior to CTHA in terms of operative time and dislocations (all pvalues < 0.05). Conclusions:The radiological and clinical outcomes of RATHA were comparable and even better than those of CTHA, except for operative time and dislocation outcomes. K E Y W O R D Sconventional, meta-analysis, radiological and clinical outcomes, robotic-assisted, total hip arthroplasty | INTRODUCTIONDue to the ageing population and increasing life expectancy, an increasing number of elderly people suffer from hip osteoarthritis and other degenerative diseases. 1 Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a safe and effective operation for end-stage hip diseases. 2 It is estimated that more than five hundred thousand people in the United States will undergo THA every year by 2030. 3 Therefore, it is critical to reduce the occurrence of complications and revision and improve long-term implant survival in THA.Due to advancements in surgical technology, improvements in prosthesis design, and optimised perioperative patient management, quality of life and prostheses survival in patients undergoing conventional total hip arthroplasty (CTHA) have greatly improved. [4][5][6] However, the incidence of complications and revisions is still not well controlled. 7 Since the introduction of robotic-assisted total hip Yuxiang Wang and Ruoyu Wang have contributed equally to this work and share the first authorship.
Objective Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) value has emerged as a cardiovascular prognostic marker. Although several recent studies suggested NLR was associated with arterial stiffness, it was still controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between NLR and arterial stiffness by measuring of brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) in an apparently healthy population. Methods This retrospective study enrolled 5612 participants during the health examinations from 1 October 2007 to 30 September 2011. Arterial stiffness was measured by baPWV. NLR was calculated as the ratio of the absolute neutrophil count to the absolute lymphocyte count in peripheral blood. According to the quartiles of NLR, the patients were categorized into four groups in males and females, respectively. Associations between NLR and baPWV were evaluated using partial correlation and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results Both female and male subjects with increased arterial stiffness (baPWV ≥ 1400 cm/s) were likely to be older (females: P < 0.001, males: P < 0.001) and have higher systolic blood pressure (females: P < 0.001, males: P < 0.001), diastolic blood pressure (females: P < 0.001, males: P < 0.001), fasting plasma glucose (females: P < 0.001, males: P < 0.001), serum total cholesterol (females: P < 0.001, males: P = 0.028), triglyceride (females: P < 0.001, males: P = 0.031), urea nitrogen (females: P < 0.001, males: P < 0.001) than those without increased arterial stiffness. In addition, compared to those without increased arterial stiffness, body mass index ( P < 0.001), waist circumference ( P < 0.001), low-density lipoproteins cholesterol ( P < 0.001), creatinine ( P < 0.001), uric acid ( P < 0.001) and lymphocytes ( P = 0.001) were higher in females with increased arterial stiffness. However, males with increased arterial stiffness had higher NLR value (2.0 ± 0.7 vs. 2.1 ± 0.9, P < 0.001) and neutrophils (4.3 ± 1.4 vs. 4.5 ± 1.5, P < 0.001) than those without increased arterial stiffness, while the difference was not found in females. ANCOVA showed that males with quartile 3 and quartile 4 of NLR had greater levels of baPWV. NLR was correlated to baPWV in males by partial correlation analysis (r = 0.110, P < 0.001), but not in females. In multiple logistic regression analysis, the quartile 4 of NLR was positively associated with increased arterial stiffness in males (OR = 1.43, 95% confidence intervals [CI]=1.12–1.82, P = 0.004), but there was no obvious correlation in females. Conclusions Our findings suggest that there is a gender difference in the relationship between arterial stiffness and NLR. After adjusting for other confounders, the risk of increased arterial stiffness in apparently healthy adult males (rather than females) is independently associated with the highest quartile of NLR.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.