Background This study was performed to compare different surgical approaches in the treatment of spinal tuberculosis. Methods We conducted a literature search to identify and analyze papers published from January 1966 to April 2018 relevant to comparison of the anterior, posterior, and anterior combined with posterior approaches in the treatment of spinal tuberculosis of the thoracic and lumbar regions. Results Twenty-five studies involving 2295 patients were identified in this systematic review. The operative time was significantly longer in the anterior combined with posterior approach than in the other two approaches. Blood loss was significantly greater in the anterior combined with posterior approach (1125.0 ± 275.5 mL) than in the posterior approach (710.4 ± 192.4 mL). The difference in correction of the kyphosis angle among the three procedures was not significant. The overall surgical and transthoracic complications were significantly lower in the posterior approach. The clinical outcome of all patients improved, but there was no significant difference among the three procedures. Conclusions Blood loss, overall surgical and transthoracic complications, and the operative time are different among the three approaches. Therefore, different factors must be carefully assessed in deciding among the three procedures.
ObjectiveThe purpose of this study is to establish a reference of intracranial structure volumes in normal fetuses ranging from 19 to 37 weeks' gestation (mean 27 weeks).Materials and MethodsA retrospective analysis of 188 MRI examinations (1.5 T) of fetuses with a normal brain appearance (19–37 gestational weeks) from January 2018 to December 2021 was included in this study. Three dimensional (3-D) volumetric parameters from slice-to-volume reconstructed (SVR) images, such as total brain volume (TBV), cortical gray matter volume (GMV), subcortical brain tissue volume (SBV), intracranial cavity volume (ICV), lateral ventricles volume (VV), cerebellum volume (CBV), brainstem volume (BM), and extra-cerebrospinal fluid volume (e-CSFV), were quantified by manual segmentation from two experts. The mean, SD, minimum, maximum, median, and 25th and 75th quartiles for intracranial structures volume were calculated per gestational week. A linear regression analysis was used to determine the gestational weekly age-related change adjusted for sex. A t-test was used to compare the mean TBV and ICV values to previously reported values at each gestational week. The formulas to calculate intracranial structures volume derived from our data were created using a regression model. In addition, we compared the predicted mean TBV values derived by our formula with the expected mean TBV predicted by the previously reported Jarvis' formula at each time point. For intracranial volumes, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to convey association within and between observers.ResultsThe intracranial volume data are shown in graphs and tabular summaries. The male fetuses had significantly larger VV compared with female fetuses (p = 0.01). Measured mean ICV values at 19 weeks are significantly different from those published in the literature (p < 0.05). Means were compared with the expected TBV generated by the previously reported formula, showing statistically differences at 22, 26, 29, and 30 weeks' gestational age (GA) (all p < 0.05). A comparison between our data-derived formula and the previously reported formula for TBV showed very similar values at every GA. The predicted TBV means derived from the previously reported formula were all within the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the predicted means of this study. Intra- and inter-observer agreement was high, with an intraclass correlation coefficient larger than 0.98.ConclusionWe have shown that the intracranial structural volume of the fetal brain can be reliably quantified using 3-D volumetric MRI with a high degree of reproducibility and reinforces the existing data with more robust data in the earlier second and third stages of pregnancy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.