Malnutrition and dental caries in early childhood remain persistent and intertwined global health challenges, particularly for indigenous and geographically-remote populations. To examine the prevalence and associations between early childhood dental caries, parent-reported mouth pain and malnutrition in the Amazonian region of Ecuador, we conducted a cross-sectional study of the oral health and nutrition status of 1407 children from birth through age 6 in the “Alli Kiru” program (2011–2013). We used multivariate regression analysis to examine relationships between severe caries, parent-reported mouth pain measures, and nutritional status. The prevalence of dental caries was 65.4%, with 44.7% of children having deep or severe caries, and 33.8% reporting mouth pain. The number of decayed, missing and filled teeth (dmft) increased dramatically with age. Malnutrition was prevalent, with 35.9% of children stunted, 1.1% wasted, 7.4% underweight, and 6.8% overweight. As mouth pain increased in frequency, odds for severe caries increased. For each unit increase in mouth pain frequency interfering with sleeping, children had increased odds for being underweight (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR): 1.27; 95% CI: 1.02–1.54) and decreased odds for being overweight (AOR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.58–0.97). This relationship was most pronounced among 3–6 year-olds. Early childhood caries, mouth pain and malnutrition were prevalent in this sample of young children. Parent-reported mouth pain was associated with severe caries, and mouth pain interfering with sleeping was predictive of poor nutritional status. We demonstrate the utility of a parsimonious parent-reported measure of mouth pain to predict young children’s risk for severe early childhood caries and malnutrition, which has implications for community health interventions.
Malnutrition and dental caries in early childhood remain persistent and intertwined global health challenges, particularly for indigenous and geographically-remote populations. To examine the prevalence and associations between early childhood dental caries, parent-reported mouth pain and malnutrition in the Amazonian region of Ecuador, we conducted a cross-sectional study of the oral health and nutrition status of 1,407 children from birth through age 6 in the "Alli Kiru" program (2011Kiru" program ( -2013. We used multivariate regression analysis to examine relationships between severe caries, parent-reported mouth pain measures, and nutritional status. The prevalence of dental caries was 65.4%, with 44.7% of children having deep or severe caries, and 33.8% reporting mouth pain.The number of decayed, missing and filled teeth dmft) increased dramatically with age.Malnutrition was prevalent, with 35.9% of children stunted, 1.1% wasted, 7.4% underweight, and 6.8% overweight. As mouth pain increased in frequency, odds for severe caries increased. For each unit increase in mouth pain frequency interfering with sleeping, children had increased odds for underweight (AOR: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.02 -1.54) and decreased odds for overweight (AOR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.58 -0.97). This relationship was most pronounced among 3-6 year-olds. Early childhood caries, mouth pain and malnutrition were prevalent in this sample of young children.Parent-reported mouth pain was associated with severe caries, and mouth pain interfering with sleeping was predictive of poor nutritional status. We demonstrate the utility of a parsimonious parent-reported measure of mouth pain to predict young children's risk for severe early childhood caries and malnutrition, which has implications for community health interventions.
Objectives: To compare the ability of SureSmileTM, InsigniaTM and InvisalignTM to achieve predicted intra-arch tooth positions and further compare their objective grading scores for alignment/rotations, marginal ridge relationships and buccolingual inclination. Materials and methods: The study was a prospective clinical trial of 145 arches from 44 females and 29 males (54 SureSmileTM arches, 35 InsigniaTM arches, and 56 InvisalignTM arches). All arches were treated by a non-extraction approach and had ≤7 mm of crowding and 45° of tooth rotation. The manufacturer’s recommendations were followed for each group and the final scans were acquired before refinements, rebonding, or wire bending. The virtual set-ups were superimposed on the final scans and the coordinates of 34 landmarks per arch were compared. One hundred and twenty-six end-of-participation arches were suitable for 3D printing and were compared using the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading Scores (OGS) for alignment/ rotations, marginal ridge relationships, and buccolingual inclination. Results: No statistically significant differences were identified in the mean deviation between the target and achieved the position of the anterior landmarks within the treatment groups. The exception was the Suresmile group which had greater vertical discrepancies in the position of the labial CEJ. Although the mean differences between the target and achieved anterior landmark positions for all groups were under 0.5 mm, the range of maximum discrepancy was between 0.7 mm and 4.1 mm. The InsigniaTM system showed significantly greater deviation in upper posterior landmark positions in the transverse and sagittal dimensions, and lower posterior landmarks in the transverse dimension. However, this was due to the InsigniaTM initial set-ups being wider. There was no statistically significant difference between the three systems in combined intra-arch OGS. However, the InvisalignTM system had a significantly poorer alignment/rotation score than the SureSmileTM group. The InsigniaTM system performed better in achieving buccolingual tooth inclination compared to SuresmileTM, and the InvisalignTM system performed better than the SuresmileTM system in the marginal ridge score. Conclusions: The three systems were comparable in achieving the predicted tooth positions of the anterior teeth in non-extraction, mild-to-moderate, crowded cases. Large discrepancies requiring operator intervention were common within the three systems. Although the three systems had no statistically significant difference in overall intra-arch OGS scores, there were significant differences in the score components.
(60.6 vs. 49.6%), multiples (6.1 vs. 2.1%), prematurely born (67.7 vs. 11.7%), weighed less than 2500 grams (71.2 vs. 12.0%), were born in a breech position (26.1 vs. 3.5%), and were delivered by caesarean section (26.5 vs. 18.7%). Their mothers were more often younger than 20 years and 35 years and older [OR¼1.8], more often had a Maroon, Creole or Indigenous ethnicity [OR's respectively 1.3, 2.1, 2.5], and were less often Hindustani [OR¼0.8] or Javanese [OR¼0.3]. Low birth weight, premature birth and a breech position were independently associated with a 6.6, 4.9 and 3.8 times increased risk of neonatal death, respectively. In addition, most babies (74%) died in the early neonatal period and within 24 hours after birth (34%), due to respiratory insufficiency as a result of infant respiratory distress syndrome (IRDS), which accounted for 53% of deaths, followed by sepsis/infection (24%) and congenital malformations (19%). Interpretation: Neonatal mortality in Suriname is high compared with more developed countries (5&) but is comparable with other countries in the Caribbean region (19&). Early neonatal death accounts for a large proportion of neonatal mortality in the multi-ethnic society of Suriname. Two-thirds of these infants are born prematurely and the timing of death is often in the first 24 hours after birth. More than half of the newborns died as a result of respiratory insufficiency. It is imperative that further measures are taken to reduce neonatal mortality. The initiation of a national neonatal intensive care unit would be a major step forward to achieve this goal.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.