Background: Whether cardiovascular risk is more tightly associated with central (cSBP) than brachial (bSBP) systolic pressure remains debated, because of their close correlation and uncertain thresholds to differentiate cSBP into normotension versus hypertension. Methods: In a person-level meta-analysis of the International Database of Central Arterial Properties for Risk Stratification (n=5576; 54.1% women; mean age 54.2 years), outcome-driven thresholds for cSBP were determined and whether the cross-classification of cSBP and bSBP improved risk stratification was explored. cSBP was tonometrically estimated from the radial pulse wave using SphygmoCor software. Results: Over 4.1 years (median), 255 composite cardiovascular end points occurred. In multivariable bootstrapped analyses, cSBP thresholds (in mm Hg) of 110.5 (95% CI, 109.1–111.8), 120.2 (119.4–121.0), 130.0 (129.6–130.3), and 149.5 (148.4–150.5) generated 5-year cardiovascular risks equivalent to the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association bSBP thresholds of 120, 130, 140, and 160. Applying 120/130 mm Hg as cSBP/bSBP thresholds delineated concordant central and brachial normotension (43.1%) and hypertension (48.2%) versus isolated brachial hypertension (5.0%) and isolated central hypertension (3.7%). With concordant normotension as reference, the multivariable hazard ratios for the cardiovascular end point were 1.30 (95% CI, 0.58–2.94) for isolated brachial hypertension, 2.28 (1.21–4.30) for isolated central hypertension, and 2.02 (1.41–2.91) for concordant hypertension. The increased cardiovascular risk associated with isolated central and concordant hypertension was paralleled by cerebrovascular end points with hazard ratios of 3.71 (1.37–10.06) and 2.60 (1.35–5.00), respectively. Conclusions: Irrespective of the brachial blood pressure status, central hypertension increased cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risk indicating the importance of controlling central hypertension.
Pulsatile blood pressure (BP) confers cardiovascular risk. Whether associations of cardiovascular end points are tighter for central systolic BP (cSBP) than peripheral systolic BP (pSBP) or central pulse pressure (cPP) than peripheral pulse pressure (pPP) is uncertain. Among 5608 participants (54.1% women; mean age, 54.2 years) enrolled in nine studies, median follow-up was 4.1 years. cSBP and cPP, estimated tonometrically from the radial waveform, averaged 123.7 and 42.5 mm Hg, and pSBP and pPP 134.1 and 53.9 mm Hg. The primary composite cardiovascular end point occurred in 255 participants (4.5%). Across fourths of the cPP distribution, rates increased exponentially (4.1, 5.0, 7.3, and 22.0 per 1000 person-years) with comparable estimates for cSBP, pSBP, and pPP. The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios, expressing the risk per 1-SD increment in BP, were 1.50 (95% CI, 1.33–1.70) for cSBP, 1.36 (95% CI, 1.19–1.54) for cPP, 1.49 (95% CI, 1.33–1.67) for pSBP, and 1.34 (95% CI, 1.19–1.51) for pPP ( P <0.001). Further adjustment of cSBP and cPP, respectively, for pSBP and pPP, and vice versa, removed the significance of all hazard ratios. Adding cSBP, cPP, pSBP, pPP to a base model including covariables increased the model fit ( P <0.001) with generalized R 2 increments ranging from 0.37% to 0.74% but adding a second BP to a model including already one did not. Analyses of the secondary end points, including total mortality (204 deaths), coronary end points (109) and strokes (89), and various sensitivity analyses produced consistent results. In conclusion, associations of the primary and secondary end points with SBP and pulse pressure were not stronger if BP was measured centrally compared with peripherally.
The risks conferred by diastolic and systolic blood pressure, irrespective of the methods of blood pressure measurement, are age-dependent. Diastolic blood pressure and isolated diastolic hypertension drive coronary risk in younger subjects, whereas systolic blood pressure is the predominant risk indicator in older people. Reversibility of the risk by diastolic BP lowering treatment in randomized trials confirms that diastolic hypertension is a risk factor that must be treated.
Abstract-No previous study has addressed the relative contributions of environmental and genetic cues to the diurnal blood pressure rhythmicity. From 24-hour ambulatory recordings of systolic blood pressure obtained in untreated patients (51% women; mean age, 51 years), we computed the night-to-day ratio in 897 and morning surge in 637. Environmental cues included season, mean daily outdoor temperature, atmospheric pressure, humidity and weekday, and the genetic cues 14 single nucleotide polymorphisms in 10 clock genes. Systolic blood pressure averaged (±SD) 126.7±11.9 mm Hg, night-to-day ratio 0.86±0.07, and morning surge 24.8±10.7 mm Hg. In adjusted analyses, night-to-day ratio was 2.4% higher in summer and 1.8% lower in winter (P<0.001) compared with the annual average with a small effect of temperature (P=0.079); morning surge was 1.7 mm Hg lower in summer and 1.1 mm Hg higher in winter (P<0.001). The other environmental cues did not add to the night-to-day ratio or morning surge variance (P≥0.37). Among the 14 genetic variations, only CLOCK rs180260 was significantly associated with morning surge after adjustment for season, temperature, and other host factors and after Bonferroni correction (P=0.044). In CLOCK rs1801260 C allele carriers (n=83), morning surge was 3.7 mm Hg higher than in TT homozygotes (n=554). Of the night-to-day ratio and morning surge variance, season and temperature explained ≈8% and ≈3%, while for genetic cues, these proportions were ≈1% or less. In conclusion, environmental compared with genetic cues are substantially stronger drivers of the diurnal blood pressure rhythmicity. Methods Study PopulationAs described elsewhere, 24,25 we recruited consecutive patients referred for ambulatory BP monitoring to the Hypertension Outpatient Clinic of Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, China. We adhered to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The Ethics Committee of Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, approved the study protocol. All patients gave informed written consent.Of patients referred from December 2008 until November 2012, 929 were eligible for inclusion in the present analysis because they were not on antihypertensive drug treatment or off antihypertensive medication for at least 2 weeks because they had both their clinic and 24-hour ambulatory BP measured and because they had been genotyped for the SNPs of interest. For analysis of the night-to-day BP ratio, we excluded 32 participants because their ambulatory BP recording was unsuccessful (n=24) or because of missing genotypes (n=8). For analysis of the morning surge, we discarded an additional 260 participants because they had not completed a diary, so that reliably differentiating between the awake and asleep periods of the day was impossible. Thus, the number of participants analyzed totaled 897 for the night-to-day BP ratio and 637 for the morning BP surge. BP MeasurementPhysicians measured the office BP after the patients had rested in the sitting position for at least 5 minutes. They obtained ...
Background: Masked hypertension is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Nonetheless, no randomized controlled trials exist in the treatment of masked hypertension. The aim of this randomized, placebo-controlled trial was to investigate the efficacy and safety of blood pressure (BP) lowering treatment with a Chinese herbal formula, gastrodia-uncaria granules (GUG), in patients with masked hypertension. Methods: Patients with an office BP of <140/90 mmHg and daytime ambulatory BP of 135-150 mmHg systolic and/or 85-95 mmHg diastolic were randomized 1:1 to the treatment of GUG or placebo 5-10 grams twice daily for 4 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was the change in daytime ambulatory BP. Results: At baseline, office and daytime BP of the 251 participants (mean age 50.4 years, 53.4% men, mean body mass index 24.5 kg/m 2 , and 2.8%, 1.6%, and 30.7% with cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, and smoking, respectively) averaged 129/82 and 135/89 mmHg, respectively. In the intention-to-treat analysis, daytime systolic/diastolic BP was reduced by 5.44 /3.39 and 2.91/1.60 mmHg in the GUG and placebo groups, respectively. The between-group difference in BP reductions was significant for the daytime (2.52/1.79 mmHg, P ≤0.025) and 24-h BP (2.33/1.49 mmHg, P ≤0.012), but not for the clinic and nighttime BPs ( P ≥0.162). The per-protocol analysis in 229 patients produced similar results. Only one adverse event (sleepiness during the day) was reported and no serious adverse event occurred. Conclusions: BP lowering treatment with Chinese traditional medicine GUG is efficacious for patients with masked hypertension. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02156024.
High blood pressure is a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Ang II (angiotensin II), a key pro-hypertensive hormone, mediates target organ consequences such as endothelial dysfunction and cardiac hypertrophy. S1P (sphingosine-1-phosphate), produced by Sphk1 (sphingosine kinase 1), plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of hypertension and downstream organ damage, as it controls vascular tone and regulates cardiac remodeling. Accordingly, we aimed to examine if pharmacological inhibition of Sphk1 using selective inhibitor PF543 can represent a useful vasoprotective and cardioprotective anti-hypertensive strategy in vivo. PF543 was administered intraperitoneally throughout a 14-day Ang II-infusion in C57BL6/J male mice. Pharmacological inhibition of Sphk1 improved endothelial function of arteries of hypertensive mice that could be mediated via decrease in eNOS (endothelial nitric oxide synthase) phosphorylation at T495. This effect was independent of blood pressure. Importantly, PF543 also reduced cardiac hypertrophy (heart to body weight ratio, 5.6±0.2 versus 6.4±0.1 versus 5.9±0.2 mg/g; P<0.05 for Sham, Ang II+placebo, and Ang II+PF543-treated mice, respectively). Mass spectrometry revealed that PF543 elevated cardiac sphingosine, that is, Sphk1 substrate, content in vivo. Mechanistically, RNA-Seq indicated a decreased expression of cardiac genes involved in actin/integrin organization, S1pr1 signaling, and tissue remodeling. Indeed, downregulation of Rock1 (Rho-associated coiled-coil containing protein kinase 1), Stat3 (signal transducer and activator of transcription 3), PKC (protein kinase C), and ERK1/2 (extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2) level/phosphorylation by PF543 was observed. In summary, pharmacological inhibition of Sphk1 partially protects against Ang II-induced cardiac hypertrophy and endothelial dysfunction. Therefore, it may represent a promising target for harnessing residual cardiovascular risk in hypertension. (Hypertension. 2020;75:383-392.
Background: Smokers may smoke cigarettes during ambulatory or home blood pressure (BP) monitoring but not clinic measurement. We investigated the prevalence of masked hypertension in relation to cigarette smoking in Chinese outpatients enrolled in a multicenter registry. Methods: Our study included 1646 men [494 (30.0%) current smokers]. We defined masked hypertension as a normal clinic SBP/DBP (<140/90 mmHg) and elevated daytime (≥135/85 mmHg) or night-time (≥120/70 mmHg) ambulatory or morning or evening home SBP/DBP (≥135/85 mmHg). Results: In all men, multiple logistic regression showed that current cigarette smoking was significantly associated with daytime [prevalence 18.7%, odds ratio (OR) 1.69, 95% confidence interval 1.27–2.25, P = 0.0003] but not night-time (prevalence 27.1%, P = 0.32) ambulatory masked hypertension and associated with evening (prevalence 14.6%, OR 1.81, confidence interval 1.33–2.47, P = 0.0002) but not morning (prevalence 17.6%, P = 0.29) home masked hypertension. The associations were more pronounced for heavy smoking (≥20 cigarettes/day) relative to never smoking for both masked daytime ambulatory (OR 1.97, P = 0.001) and evening home hypertension (OR 2.40, P < 0.0001) or in patients over 55 years of age (P for interaction in relation to daytime ambulatory masked hypertension = 0.005). In men with clinic normotension (n = 742), the associations were also significant (P < 0.01), particularly in those with a normal to high-normal clinic BP (n = 619, P < 0.04). Conclusion: Cigarette smoking was associated with increased odds of masked daytime ambulatory and evening home hypertension, especially in heavy smoking or older men.
Background Pulse pressure (PP) reflects the age-related stiffening of the central arteries, but no study addressed the management of the PP-related risk over the human lifespan. Methods In 4663 young (18-49 years) and 7185 older adults (≥50 years), brachial PP was recorded over 24-hour. Total mortality and all major cardiovascular events combined (MACE) were co-primary endpoints. Cardiovascular death, coronary events and stroke were secondary endpoints. Results In young adults (median follow-up, 14.1 years; mean PP, 45.1 mmHg), greater PP was not associated with absolute risk; the endpoint rates were ≤2.01 per 1000 person-years. The adjusted hazard ratios expressed per 10mmHg PP increments were less than unity (P≤0.027) for MACE (0.67; 95% CI, 0.47-0.96) and cardiovascular death (0.33; 95% CI, 0.11-0.75). In older adults (median follow-up, 13.1 years; mean PP, 52.7 mmHg), the endpoint rates, expressing absolute risk, ranged from 22.5 to 45.4 per 1000 person-years and the adjusted hazard ratios, reflecting relative risk, from 1.09 to 1.54 (P<0.0001). The PPrelated relative risks of death, MACE and stroke decreased >3-fold from age 55 to 75 years, whereas absolute risk rose by a factor 3. Conclusions From 50 years onwards, the PP-related relative risk decreases, whereas absolute risk increases. From a lifecourse perspective, young adulthood provides a window of opportunity to manage risk factors and prevent target organ damage as forerunner of premature death and MACE. In older adults, treatment should address absolute risk, thereby extending life in years and quality.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.