In stage I/II NK/T-cell lymphomas, when effective chemotherapeutic regimens were used, CCRT and sequential CT + RT gave similar outcome.

No abstract

Management options for patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) have evolved substantially over the past decades. The American Society of Hematology published a treatment guideline for clinicians referring to the management of ITP in 2011. This evidence-based practice guideline for ITP enables the appropriate treatment of a larger proportion of patients and the maintenance of normal platelet counts. Korean authority operates a unified mandatory national health insurance system. Even though we have a uniform standard guideline enforced by insurance reimbursement, there are several unsolved issues in real practice in ITP treatment. To optimize the management of Korean ITP patients, the Korean Society of Hematology Aplastic Anemia Working Party (KSHAAWP) reviewed the consensus and the Korean data on the clinical practices of ITP therapy. Here, we report a Korean expert recommendation guide for the management of ITP.

Objectives: The complement component 5 (C5) inhibitor ravulizumab demonstrated non-inferiority to eculizumab following 26 weeks of treatment in complement inhibitor-naïve and complement inhibitor-experienced patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH; studies 301 and 302, respectively). This study aims to describe the results of both studies from 27 weeks to 2 years.Methods: Patients (N = 441) continued to receive ravulizumab throughout the extension period. Efficacy endpoints included lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) normalization, transfusion avoidance and fatigue score (FACIT-F). Safety analyses were also performed.Results: From 27 weeks to 2 years, improvements in LDH levels were maintained in both study populations. Transfusion avoidance was maintained in 81.9% (study 301) and 85.6% (study 302) of patients, and FACIT-F scores remained stable. Ravulizumab was well tolerated, and the incidence of adverse events (AEs) were similar between patients of both studies. Incidence of serious AEs deemed related to ravulizumab treatment was low (<3%).Conclusions: This study reports, to date, the longest period of follow-up in over 400 patients with PNH treated with ravulizumab (662 patient-years). Long-term, ravulizumab demonstrated durable efficacy and was well tolerated, highlighting the importance of C5 inhibitors as the mainstay of PNH treatment.

3738 Background BCR/ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) is now a standard initial treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Several cases reported that hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation were related to imatinib therapy. However, it is still unclear whether imatinib or other TKIs induce HBV reactivation in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive patients. The aim of this study is to investigate the incidence of HBV reactivation and analyze risk factors associated with HBV reactivation in CML patients who are treated with various TKIs. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records from 8 centers in South Korea. HBsAg-positive CML patients under imatinib or other TKIs treatment were analyzed. Results 702 patients were diagnosed CML from participating centers. HBsAg-positive rate was 6.1% (43/702) at diagnosis. In the 43 HBsAg-positive patients, nine patients received prophylactic therapy and HBV reactivation rate was 34.9% (15/43) (95% CI: 21.0–50.9%). Patients who received prophylaxis did not develop HBV reactivation. The median age and the male to female ratio of the HBV reactivated patients were 47.0 years (range; 22–63) and 4:1, respectively. HBV reactivation according to each TKI treatments were: 12 cases under imatinib, 2 cases under dasatinib, and 1 case under nilotinib. Median time to HBV reactivation was 9.3 months (range; 2.3–68.8 months) (95% CI: 5.9 – 28.5 months). None of the patients died due to HBV reactivation, but one patient received liver transplantation due to hepatic failure. Prophylactic therapy and HBV DNA level at diagnosis were the factors associated with HBV reactivation (P=0.011 and P=0.036, respectively). Conclusion This is first report that has analyzed HBV reactivation in HBsAg-positive CML patients during TKIs treatment. Prophylaxis should be considered to prevent HBV reactivation during TKI treatment. Also, we recommend that HBsAg-positive patients with CML receiving TKI treatment be closely monitored. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis, is a condition characterized by abnormal blood clot formation in the pulmonary arteries and the deep venous vasculature. It is often serious and sometimes even fatal if not promptly and appropriately treated. Moreover, the later consequences of VTE may result in reduced quality of life. The treatment of VTE depends on various factors, including the type, cause, and patient comorbidities. Furthermore, bleeding may occur as a side effect of VTE treatment. Thus, it is necessary to carefully weigh the benefits versus the risks of VTE treatment and to actively monitor patients undergoing treatment. Asian populations are known to have lower VTE incidences than Western populations, but recent studies have shown an increase in the incidence of VTE in Asia. A variety of treatment options are currently available owing to the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants. The current VTE treatment recommendation is based on evidence from previous studies, but it should be applied with careful consideration of the racial, genetic, and social characteristics in the Korean population.

Background Radotinib is a second generation BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) developed by IL-YANG Pharm. Co., Ltd (Seoul, South Korea) and approved by the Korea FDA for the treatment of chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) patients who have failed prior TKIs. We conducted the randomized, open-label, phase 3 study to assess the efficacy and safety of radotinib, as compared with imatinib, for the first-line treatment of newly diagnosed CML-CP. Methods Based on baseline demographics and Sokal risk score, 241 patients were randomized 1:1:1 to radotinib 300 mg twice daily (bid) (n=79), radotinib 400 mg bid (n=81), or imatinib 400 mg once daily (qd) (n=81). The primary endpoint was the rate of major molecular response (MMR) by 12 months and molecular response was assessed by RQ-PCR at baseline and every 3 months. Secondary endpoints were the rate of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), MR4.5 by 12 months, and the rate of progression to accelerate phase or blast crisis. Results All three study groups were well balanced with baseline age, gender, race and Sokal risk score. With minimum follow-up of 12 months, the proportions of patients receiving a study drug were 86.3% (69/79) in radotinib 300 mg bid group, 71.6% (58/81) in radotinib 400 mg bid group, and 81.5% (66/81) in imatinib 400 mg qd group. By 12 months, rates of MMR were significantly higher in patients receiving radotinib 300 mg bid (51.9%, P = .0044) and radotinib 400 mg bid (45.7%, P = .0342) compared with imatinib (29.6%). The median time to MMR among responders were shorter on radotinib 300 mg bid (5.7 months) and radotinib 400 mg bid (5.6 months) than imatinib group (8.2 months). The MR4.5 rates by 12 months were also higher for both radotinib 300 mg bid (15.2%) and 400 mg bid (13.6%) compared to imatinib (8.6%). The CCyR rates by 12 months were also higher for radotinib 300 mg bid (91.1%, P = .0120) compared with imatinib (76.5%). There was no progression to accelerated phase or blast crisis in all groups by 12 months. Discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) or laboratory abnormalities occurred in 7 (8.8%), 16 (19.8%), and 5 (6.2%) patients for radotinib 300 mg bid, radotinib 400 mg bid and imatinib, respectively. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 16.5% of patients receiving radotinib 300 mg bid, in 13.6% for radotinib 400 mg bid, and in 19.8% receiving imatinib. And grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 19.0%, 23.5%, and 29.6% for radotinib 300 mg bid, 400 mg bid and imatinib, respectively. The most common any grade non-laboratory AEs were skin rash (35.4% and 33.3%), nausea/vomiting (22.8% and 23.5%), headache (19.0% and 30.9%), and pruritus (19.0% and 30.0%) in radotinib 300 mg bid and radotinib 400 mg bid, respectively; AEs in the imatinib group were edema (34.6%), myalgia (28.4%), nausea/vomiting (27.2%), and skin rash (22.2%). Overall, grade 3/4 non-laboratory AEs were uncommon in all groups. Conclusions With minimum 12 months follow-up, radotinib demonstrated significantly higher and faster rates of CCyR and MMR than imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed CML-CP. The safety profiles of the radotinib and imatinib were different, and most AEs were manageable with optimal dose reduction. The results of this trial support that radotinib can be one of the standard of care in newly diagnosed CML-CP. Table. Baseline Characteristics, Molecular and Cytogenetic Response Rates Radotinib 300mg BID Radotinib 400mg BID Imatinib 400mg QD (N=79) (N=81) (N=81) Age, median (range), years 45 (20-75) 43 (18-84) 45 (18-83) Gender, n (%) Male 52 (65.8) 47 (58.0) 52 (64.2) Female 27 (34.2) 34 (42.0) 29 (35.8) Sokal risk, n (%) Low 21 (26.6) 22 (27.2) 22 (27.2) Intermediate 38 (48.1) 38 (46.9) 39 (48.2) High 20 (25.3) 21 (25.9) 20 (24.7) MMR by 12 months, % 51.9 45.7 29.6 P = .0044 P = .0342 Cumulative Incidence of MMR by 12 months¢Ó, % 57.0 58.0 35.0 P = .0040 P = .0037 MR4.5 by 12 months, % 15.2 13.6 8.6 CCyR by 12 months, % 91.1 81.5 76.5 ¢Ó Kaplan-Meier estimates of MMR Disclosures Kim: IL-YANG Pharm. Co. Ltd: Research Funding. Kim:Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Chung:Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Choi:Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

No abstract