Background: Base excision repair is hindered by nucleosomes. Results: Outwardly oriented uracils near the nucleosome center are efficiently cleaved; however, polymerase ␤ is strongly inhibited at these sites. Conclusion:The histone octamer presents different levels of constraints on BER, dependent on the structural requirements for enzyme activity. Significance: Chromatin remodeling is necessary to prevent accumulation of aborted intermediates in nucleosomes.

Histones play a crucial role in the organization of DNA in the nucleus, but their presence can prevent interactions with DNA binding proteins responsible for repair of DNA damage. Uracil is an abundant mutagenic lesion recognized by uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG) in the first step of base excision repair (BER). In nucleosome core particles (NCPs), we find substantial differences in UDGdirected cleavage at uracils rotationally positioned toward (U-In) or away from (U-Out) the histone core, or midway between these orientations (U-Mid). Whereas U-Out NCPs show a cleavage rate just below that of naked DNA, U-In and U-Mid NCPs have markedly slower rates of cleavage. Crosslinking of U-In DNA to histones in NCPs yields a greater reduction in cleavage rate but, surprisingly, yields a higher rate of cleavage in U-Out NCPs compared with uncrosslinked NCPs. Moreover, the next enzyme in BER, APE1, stimulates the activity of human UDG in U-Out NCPs, suggesting these enzymes interact on the surface of histones in orientations accessible to UDG. These data indicate that the activity of UDG likely requires "trapping" transiently exposed states arising from the rotational dynamics of DNA on histones.chromatin | DNA damage | glycosylase | histones | APE1 endonuclease

DNA damage in chromatin comes in many forms, including single base lesions that induce base excision repair (BER). We (and others) have shown that the structural location of DNA lesions within nucleosomes greatly influences their accessibility to repair enzymes. Indeed, a difference in the location of uracil as small as one-half turn of the DNA backbone on the histone surface can result in a 10-fold difference in the time course of its removal in vitro. In addition, the cell has evolved several interdependent processes capable of enhancing the accessibility of excision repair enzymes to DNA lesions in nucleosomes, including post-translational modification of histones, ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling and interchange of histone variants in nucleosomes. In this review, we focus on different factors that affect accessibility of BER enzymes to nucleosomal DNA.

Edited by Patrick SungNumerous ribonucleotides are incorporated into the genome during DNA replication. Oxidized ribonucleotides can also be erroneously incorporated into DNA. Embedded ribonucleotides destabilize the structure of DNA and retard DNA synthesis by DNA polymerases (pols), leading to genomic instability. Mammalian cells possess translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) pols that bypass DNA damage. The mechanism of TLS and repair of oxidized ribonucleotides remains to be elucidated. To address this, we analyzed the miscoding properties of the ribonucleotides riboguanosine (rG) and 7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-riboguanosine (8-oxo-rG) during TLS catalyzed by the human TLS pols and in vitro. The primer extension reaction catalyzed by human replicative pol ␣ was strongly blocked by 8-oxo-rG. pol inefficiently bypassed rG and 8-oxo-rG compared with dG and 7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-2-deoxyguanosine (8-oxo-dG), whereas pol easily bypassed the ribonucleotides. pol ␣ exclusively inserted dAMP opposite 8-oxo-rG. Interestingly, pol preferentially inserted dCMP opposite 8-oxo-rG, whereas the insertion of dAMP was favored opposite 8-oxo-dG. In addition, pol accurately bypassed 8-oxo-rG. Furthermore, we examined the activity of the base excision repair (BER) enzymes 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase (OGG1) and apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 on the substrates, including rG and 8-oxorG. Both BER enzymes were completely inactive against 8-oxo-rG in DNA. However, OGG1 suppressed 8-oxo-rG excision by RNase H2, which is involved in the removal of ribonucleotides from DNA. These results suggest that the different sugar backbones between 8-oxo-rG and 8-oxo-dG alter the capacity of TLS and repair of 8-oxoguanine.

RNA abasic sites and the mechanisms involved in their regulation are mostly unknown; in contrast, DNA abasic sites are well-studied. We found surprisingly that, in yeast and human cells, RNA abasic sites are prevalent. When a base is lost from RNA, the remaining ribose is found as a closed-ring or an open-ring sugar with a reactive C1′ aldehyde group. Using primary amine-based reagents that react with the aldehyde group, we uncovered evidence for abasic sites in nascent RNA, messenger RNA, and ribosomal RNA from yeast and human cells. Mass spectroscopic analysis confirmed the presence of RNA abasic sites. The RNA abasic sites were found to be coupled to R-loops. We show that human methylpurine DNA glycosylase cleaves N-glycosidic bonds on RNA and that human apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 incises RNA abasic sites in RNA–DNA hybrids. Our results reveal that, in yeast and human cells, there are RNA abasic sites, and we identify a glycosylase that generates these sites and an AP endonuclease that processes them.

DNA polymerase (Pol) β maintains genome fidelity by catalyzing DNA synthesis and removal of a reactive DNA repair intermediate during base excision repair (BER). Situated within the middle of the BER pathway, Pol β must efficiently locate its substrates before damage is exacerbated. The mechanisms of damage search and location by Pol β are largely unknown, but are critical for understanding the fundamental features of the BER pathway. We developed a processive search assay to determine if Pol β has evolved a mechanism for efficient DNA damage location. These assays revealed that Pol β scans DNA using a processive hopping mechanism and has a mean search footprint of ∼24 bp at predicted physiological ionic strength. Lysines within the lyase domain are required for processive searching, revealing a novel function for the lyase domain of Pol β. Application of our processive search assay into nucleosome core particles revealed that Pol β is not processive in the context of a nucleosome, and its single-turnover activity is reduced ∼500-fold, as compared to free DNA. These data suggest that the repair footprint of Pol β mainly resides within accessible regions of the genome and that these regions can be scanned for damage by Pol β.

Histone posttranslational modifications have been associated with changes in chromatin structure necessary for transcription, replication, and DNA repair. Acetylation is one of the most studied and best characterized histone posttranslational modifications, but it is not known if histone acetylation modulates base excision repair of DNA lesions in chromatin. To address this question, we generated nucleosome core particles (NCPs) containingsite-specificallyacetylatedH3K14orH3K56andmea-sured repair of uracil and single-nucleotide gaps. We find that H3K56Ac and H3K14Ac do not significantly contribute to removal of uracils by uracil DNA glycosylase regardless of the translational or rotational position of the lesions within NCPs. In repair of single-nucleotide gaps, however, the presence of H3K56Ac or H3K14Ac in NCPs decreases the gap-filling activity of DNA polymerase ␤ near the dyad center, with H3K14Ac exhibiting stronger inhibition. To a lesser extent, H3K56Ac induces a similar effect near the DNA ends. Moreover, using restriction enzyme accessibility, we detect no changes in NCP structure or dynamics between H3K14Ac-NCPs and WT-NCPs containing single-nucleotide gaps. Thus, acetylation at H3K56 and H3K14 in nucleosomes may promote alternative gap-filling pathways by inhibiting DNA polymerase ␤ activity.Eukaryotic DNA is organized into arrays of nucleosomes, which constitute the primary level of chromatin compaction. Vital DNA-templated processes, including transcription and DNA repair, are dependent on protein-DNA interactions, which are restricted by the histone proteins in nucleosomes. The nucleosome core particle (NCP) 3 consists of 147 bp of DNA wrapped ϳ1.7 times around a histone octamer composed of a tetramer of histones H3 and H4 ((H3-H4) 2 ) flanked by two heterodimers of histones H2A and H2B (H2A-H2B) (1). Accessibility of nuclear factors to occluded DNA in this stable, yet dynamic protein-DNA complex is regulated by multiple mechanisms, including the activity of chromatin remodeling complexes (2, 3) and the intrinsic, partial unwrapping of DNA ends from the histone octamer (4, 5).The rate of DNA unwrapping, also referred to as DNA breathing, in nucleosomes is dependent on DNA sequence and the posttranslational modification (PTM) status of the histones (6 -8

Nucleosome dynamics, such as spontaneous DNA unwrapping, are postulated to have a critical role in regulating the access of DNA repair machinery to DNA lesions within nucleosomes. However, the specific histone domains that regulate nucleosome dynamics and the impact of such changes in intrinsic nucleosome dynamics on DNA repair are not well understood. Previous studies identified a highly conserved region in the N-terminal tail of histone H2B known as the istone H2epression (or HBR) domain, which has a significant influence on gene expression, chromatin assembly, and DNA damage formation and repair. However, the molecular mechanism(s) that may account for these observations are limited. In this study, we characterized the stability and dynamics of ΔHBR mutant nucleosome core particles (NCPs) by restriction enzyme accessibility (REA), FRET, and temperature-induced sliding of histone octamers. Our results indicate that ΔHBR-NCPs are more dynamic, with a larger steady-state fraction of the NCP population occupying the unwrapped state than for WT-NCPs. Additionally, ΔHBR-histone octamers are more susceptible to temperature-induced sliding on DNA than WT histone octamers. Furthermore, we show that the activity of base excision repair enzymes at uracil lesions and single nucleotide gaps is enhanced in a site-specific manner in ΔHBR-NCPs. This enhanced activity correlates well with regions exhibiting increased DNA unwrapping. Finally, removal of the HBR domain is not sufficient to completely alleviate the structural constraints imposed by histone octamers on the activity of base excision repair enzymes.