In coronavirus disease 2019 , cardiovascular risk factors and myocardial injury relate to increased mortality. We evaluated the extent of cardiac sequelae 6 months after hospital discharge in patients surviving ICU hospitalization for COVID-19.Methods: All survivors of Maastricht-ICU were invited for comprehensive cardiovascular evaluation 6 months after discharge from ICU. Cardiac screening included an electrocardiogram, cardiac biomarkers, echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and, wherever indicated, cardiac computed tomography or coronary angiogram.Results: Out of 52 survivors, 81% (n ¼ 42) participated to the cardiovascular follow-up [median follow-up of 6 months, interquartile range (IQR) 6.1-6.7]. Eight patients (19%) had newly diagnosed coronary artery disease (CAD), of which two required a percutaneous intervention. Echocardiographic global longitudinal strain (GLS) was abnormal in 24% and CMR-derived GLS was abnormal in 12%, despite normal left ventricular ejection fraction in all. None of the patients showed elevated T 1 relaxation times and five patients (14%) had an elevated T 2 relaxation time. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) reflecting regional myocardial fibrosis was increased in eight patients (21%), of which three had myocarditis and three had pericarditis. Conclusion:Cardiovascular follow-up at 6 months after ICU-admission for severe COVID-19 revealed that one out of five invasively mechanically ventilated survivors had CAD, a quarter had subclinical left ventricular dysfunction defined as reduced echocardiographic GLS, and 42% of the patients had CMR abnormalities (reduced LVEF, reduced GLS, LGE presence, and elevated T 2 ). On the basis of these findings, long-term cardiovascular follow-up is strongly recommended in all post-IC COVID-19 patients.Clinical Trial Registration: Trial Register number [NL8613]) https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/8613

Preeclampsia is a maternal hypertensive disease, complicating 2–8% of all pregnancies. It has been linked to a 2–7-fold increased risk for the development of cardiovascular disease, including heart failure, later in life. A total of 40% of formerly preeclamptic women develop preclinical heart failure, which may further deteriorate into clinical heart failure. Noninvasive cardiac imaging could assist in the early detection of myocardial abnormalities, especially in the preclinical stage, when these changes are likely to be reversible. Moreover, imaging studies can improve our insights into the relationship between preeclampsia and heart failure and can be used for monitoring. Cardiac ultrasound is used to assess quantitative changes, including the left ventricular cavity volume and wall thickness, myocardial mass, systolic and diastolic function, and strain. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging may be of additional diagnostic value to assess diffuse and focal fibrosis and perfusion. After preeclampsia, sustained elevated myocardial mass along with reduced myocardial circumferential and longitudinal strain and decreased diastolic function is reported. These findings are consistent with the early phases of heart failure, referred to as preclinical (asymptomatic) or B-stage heart failure. In this review, we will provide an up-to-date overview of the potential of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography in identifying formerly preeclamptic women who are at high risk for developing heart failure. The potential contribution to early cardiac screening of women with a history of preeclampsia and the pros and cons of these imaging modalities are outlined. Finally, recommendations for future research are presented.

What are the novel findings of this work?Global and local volumetric changes of the mother's cerebrum observed in the first two decades after childbirth are age-related but independent of pre-eclamptic history. Additionally, we found no evidence of greater white-matter lesion load after pre-eclampsia. What are the clinical implications of this work?In the first years after pre-eclampsia, volumes of cerebral structures are not different compared with those in parous controls, which is reassuring. However, long-term effects after two decades could not be ruled out. Longitudinal studies are warranted to investigate whether early clinical management is needed.