Bungarus multicinctus, the Chinese krait, is a highly venomous elapid snake which causes considerable morbidity and mortality in southern China. B. multicinctus venom contains pre-synaptic PLA2 neurotoxins (i.e., β-bungarotoxins) and post-synaptic neurotoxins (i.e., α-bungarotoxins). We examined the in vitro neurotoxicity of B. multicinctus venom, and the efficacy of specific monovalent Chinese B. multicinctus antivenom, and Australian polyvalent elapid snake antivenom, against venom-induced neurotoxicity. B. multicinctus venom (1–10 μg/mL) abolished indirect twitches in the chick biventer cervicis nerve-muscle preparation as well as attenuating contractile responses to exogenous ACh and CCh, but not KCl. This indicates a post-synaptic neurotoxic action but myotoxicity was not evident. Given that post-synaptic α-neurotoxins have a more rapid onset than pre-synaptic neurotoxins, the activity of the latter in the whole venom will be masked. The prior addition of Chinese B. multicinctus antivenom (12 U/mL) or Australian polyvalent snake antivenom (15 U/mL), markedly attenuated the neurotoxic actions of B. multicinctus venom (3 μg/mL) and prevented the inhibition of contractile responses to ACh and CCh. The addition of B. multicinctus antivenom (60 U/mL), or Australian polyvalent snake antivenom (50 U/mL), at the t90 time point after the addition of B. multicinctus venom (3 μg/mL), did not restore the twitch height over 180 min. The earlier addition of B. multicinctus antivenom (60 U/mL), at the t20 or t50 time points, also failed to prevent the neurotoxic effects of the venom but did delay the time to abolish twitches based on a comparison of t90 values. Repeated washing of the preparation with physiological salt solution, commencing at the t20 time point, failed to reverse the neurotoxic effects of venom or delay the time to abolish twitches. This study showed that B. multicinctus venom displays marked in vitro neurotoxicity in a skeletal muscle preparation which is not reversed by antivenom. This does not appear to be related to antivenom efficacy, but due to the irreversible/pseudo-irreversible nature of the neurotoxins.
Introduction: We have previously demonstrated that the naturally-occurring anti-inflammatory and pro-resolving protein Annexin-A1 (Anx-A1) limits the acute inflammatory response post myocardial infarction, but its impact on chronic inflammation, such as hypertension, has not been explored. This study aims to investigate the role of Anx-A1 in a preclinical model of hypertension, induced by angiotensin-II (Ang-II). Methods: 15-week-old male C57BL/6 or ANXA1 -/- were anesthetized (isoflurane, 2-4% v/v) and implanted with an osmotic minipump randomly assigned to receive Ang-II (0.7mg/kg/day) or vehicle (saline). Radiotelemetry recordings of blood pressure were taken at 10 intermittent timepoints from baseline to the end of the 29-day infusion period. Animals were euthanized with pentobarbitone (100mg/kg; i.p.) at endpoint and organ weights recorded and normalized to bodyweight. Left ventricle (LV) samples were stained with picrosirius red to assess total LV collagen deposition. Results: Ang II-induced mice at the end of the study had elevated mean arterial pressure (MAP), cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis compared to normotensive mice (Table). Anx-A1 deficient mice given Ang II had an even greater increase in MAP and cardiac remodeling compared to WT. Interestingly, MAP of Anx-A1 deficient mice at baseline is significantly higher compare to C57BL/6 counterparts (Table). Conclusion: This is the first study to demonstrate that deficiency of Anx-A1 exaggerates cardiac remodeling in AngII-induced hypertension, suggesting that endogenous Anx-A1 might play previously unappreciated physiological role in regulating blood pressure. This supports the development of Anx-A1 based pharmacotherapy against hypertension-induced cardiac damage.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.