This essay explores differences in aesthetic response scales for popular illustrations. A total of 254 subjects participated in this study, which involved answering a questionnaire consisting of 7-point scales by using a computer device. The data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, multivariate analysis of variance, and exploratory factor analysis. The principle findings were as follows: First, popular illustrations seemed to elicit some interest and a little novelty, and the aesthetic evaluation was positive in most responses. Second, except for one affective factor-preference-and two cognitive factors-interest and meaning-the ratings of most factors involved in the aesthetic evaluation were higher among adults than among adolescents. The coordination between cognition and affection evoked by the aesthetic processing of visual stimuli might be the true key to understanding the generational differences in the perception of popular illustrations. Third, the ratings for apprehending complexity among females were significantly higher than those among males. The converse was true of the scores for apprehending activity, and activity presumably played an important aesthetic role among adolescents. In conclusion, this research provides a preliminary examination of the aesthetic responses to popular illustrations; however, it has some limitations that can be addressed in future studies.
Although the aesthetic experience of popular illustrations is frequent in modern life, no scientific research can fully explain its psychological structure so far. This study aims to develop an aesthetic model of perception, affection, and cognition, presenting an aesthetic psychological framework for contemporary popular illustration. Thirty representative illustrations were selected as experimental stimuli from design media, and a seven-point scale with 10 paired adjectives of underlying psychological factors was built by analyzing systematic aesthetic researches by literature review. A total of 386 volunteers were recruited for the experimental survey. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) through structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to confirm the proposed model. The results showed that beauty, pleasure, and interestingness are the optimum indicators measuring the aesthetic experience of popular illustrations, and instead of the underlying meanings, the positive self-rewarding quality makes aesthetic experience of popular illustrations special.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.