Within our cohort of patients residing in North Carolina, those with CRS have higher income, more access to primary care, and lower markers of disease severity than those with AFRS. These data continue to support the notion that AFRS merits classification as a distinct subtype of CRS.

Introduction Traumatic injuries account for the greatest portion of global surgical burden particularly in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). To assess effectiveness of a developing trauma system, we hypothesize that there are survival differences between direct and indirect transfer of trauma patients to a tertiary hospital in sub Saharan Africa. Methods Retrospective analysis of 51,361 trauma patients within the Kamuzu Central Hospital (KCH) trauma registry from 2008 to 2012 was performed. Analysis of patient characteristics and logistic regression modeling for in-hospital mortality was performed. The primary study outcome is in hospital mortality in the direct and indirect transfer groups. RESULTS There were 50,059 trauma patients were included in this study. 6,578 patients transferred from referring facilities and 43,481 patients transported from the scene. The indirect and direct transfer cohorts were similar in age and sex. The mechanism of injury for transferred patients was 78.1% blunt, 14.5% penetrating, and 7.4% other, whereas for the scene group it was 70.7% blunt, 24.0% penetrating, and 5.2% other. Median times to presentation were 13(4–30) and 3(1–14) hours for transferred and scene patients, respectively. Mortality rate was 4.2% and 1.6% for indirect and direct transfer cohorts, respectively. A total of 8816 patients were admitted of which 3636 and 5963 were in the transfer and scene cohort, respectively. After logistic regression analysis, the adjusted in-hospital mortality odds ratio was 2.09 (1.24–3.54);p=0.006 for indirect transfer versus direct transfer cohort, after controlling for significant covariates. Conclusions Direct transfer of trauma patients from the scene to the tertiary care center is associated with a survival benefit. Our findings suggest that trauma education and efforts directed at regionalization of trauma care, strengthening pre-hospital care and timely transfer from district hospitals could mitigate trauma-related mortality in a resource-poor setting.

Healthy self confidence has an important role in surgery, but we must take care that it doesn’t develop into disruptive ego, say Christopher G Myers and colleagues

Increasing attention has been paid to the selection of otolaryngology residents, a highly competitive process but one with room for improvement. A recent commentary in this journal recommended that residency programs more thoroughly incorporate theory and evidence from personnel psychology (part of the broader field of organizational science) in the resident selection process. However, the focus of this recommendation was limited to applicants' cognitive abilities and independent work-oriented traits (eg, conscientiousness). We broaden this perspective to consider critical interpersonal skills and traits that enhance resident effectiveness in interdependent health care organizations and we expand beyond the emphasis on selection to consider how these skills can be honed during residency. We advocate for greater use of standardized team-based care simulations, which can aid in assessing and developing the key interpersonal leadership skills necessary for success as an otolaryngology resident.

Palliative care is an underutilized and often misunderstood discipline in the treatment of patients with head and neck cancer. The key components of palliative care include symptoms management, psychosocial support, and enhanced communications. Abundant evidence has demonstrated the beneficial effect for the early incorporation of palliative care in the treatment paradigm for patients with chronic diseases and malignancies, with findings supporting its positive effect on patients' quality of life as well their survival. Particularly for otolaryngologists, the unique morbidities of head and neck cancer make our patients especially vulnerable and even more in need of the support and benefits that can come from palliative care. While increased consultation with palliative care providers for patients with head and neck cancer is a good first step, training otolaryngologists to develop their own "primary palliative care competencies" is key for improving our patients' outcomes.