Integrated PET/contrast-enhanced CT is an accurate modality for assessing ovarian cancer recurrence and led to changes in the subsequent appropriate therapy.

Integrated PET/contrast-enhanced CT is an accurate modality for assessing colorectal cancer recurrence and led to changes in the subsequent appropriate therapy.

The purpose is to evaluate the accuracy of integrated FDG-PET/CT, compared with PET alone, for diagnosis of suspected recurrence of uterine cervical cancer. Fifty-two women who had undergone treatment for histopathologically proven cervical cancer received PET/CT with suspected recurrence. PET-alone and integrated PET/CT images were evaluated by two different experienced radiologists by consensus for each investigation. A final diagnosis was confirmed by histopathology, radiological imaging, and clinical follow-up for over 1 year. Patient-based analysis showed that the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PET/CT were 92.0% (23/25), 92.6% (25/27), and 92.3% (48/52), respectively, while for PET, the corresponding figures were 80.0% (20/25), 77.8% (21/27), and 78.8% (41/52), respectively. PET/CT resolved the false-positive PET results due to hypermetabolic activity of benign/inflammatory lesions and physiological variants, and was able to detect lung metastasis, local recurrence, peritoneal dissemination, para-aortic lymph node metastasis, and pelvic lymph node metastasis missed by PET alone. However, tiny local recurrence and lymph node metastasis could not be detected even by PET/CT. FDG-PET/CT is a useful complementary modality for providing good anatomic and functional localization of sites of recurrence during follow-up of patients with cervical cancer.

FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT is a more accurate modality for assessing recurrence of uterine cancer, and led to more appropriate subsequent clinical management than that resulting from PET alone or enhanced CT alone.

DNA intrastrand cross-linking agents such as oxaliplatin induce DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) during DNA repair and replication. In the present study, we hypothesized that DNA intrastrand cross-linking agents may significantly benefit colorectal cancer patients with deficiencies in DSB repair. Seventy-eight patients with metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer who had measurable target lesions and who underwent resection for primary colorectal cancer in our institution between April 2007 and March 2013 were included in the present study. The median age was 64.5 years, and the cohort consisted of 49 males and 29 females. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.9 months. The expression of DSB repair proteins such as RAD51 and MRE11 was investigated by immunohistochemistry, and associations between RAD51 and MRE11 expression and clinicopathological factors or chemotherapeutic effect were assessed. MRE11-negative cases and RAD51-negative cases achieved significantly better tumor reduction compared with cases with positive expression. Cases with negative expression of both proteins or negative expression of either protein had significantly longer PFS than cases with positive expression for both proteins. In conclusion, DSB repair protein expression-negative colorectal cancer cases may be more highly sensitive to chemotherapy, and thus DSB repair protein expression may be a useful prognostic indicator for colorectal cancer patients.