Context Daily growth hormone (GH) injections can be burdensome for patients and carers. Somapacitan is a long-acting, reversible albumin-binding GH derivative in development for once-weekly administration in patients with growth hormone deficiency (GHD). Objective The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of once-weekly somapacitan vs once-daily GH. Design REAL 3 is a multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blind (somapacitan doses), phase 2 study with a 26-week main and 26-week extension phase (NCT02616562). Setting This study took place at 29 sites in 11 countries. Patients Fifty-nine GH treatment-naive prepubertal children with GHD were randomly assigned; 58 completed the trial. Interventions Interventions comprised 3 somapacitan doses (0.04 [n = 16], 0.08 [n = 15], or 0.16 mg/kg/wk [n = 14]) and daily GH (0.034 mg/kg/d [n = 14]), administered subcutaneously. Main Outcome Measures The primary end point was height velocity (HV) at week 26. Secondary efficacy end points included HV SD score (SDS) and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) SDS. Results At week 26, mean (SD) annualized HV for the somapacitan groups was 8.0 (2.0), 10.9 (1.9), and 12.9 (3.5) cm/year, respectively, vs 11.4 (3.3) cm/year for daily GH; estimated treatment difference (somapacitan 0.16 mg/kg/week—daily GH): 1.7 [95% CI –0.2 to 3.6] cm/year. HV was sustained at week 52, and significantly greater with somapacitan 0.16 mg/kg/week vs daily GH. Mean (SD) change from baseline in HV SDS at week 52 was 4.72 (2.79), 6.14 (3.36), and 8.60 (3.15) for the somapacitan groups, respectively, vs 7.41 (4.08) for daily GH. Model-derived mean (SD) IGF-I SDS for the somapacitan groups was −1.62 (0.86), −1.09 (0.78), and 0.31 (1.06), respectively, vs −0.40 (1.50) observed for daily GH. Safety and tolerability were consistent with the profile of daily GH. Conclusions In children with GHD, once-weekly somapacitan 0.16 mg/kg/week provided the closest efficacy match with similar safety and tolerability to daily GH after 26 and 52 weeks of treatment. A short visual summary of our work is available (1).
This study aimed to elucidate the gene and lipid profiles of children clinically diagnosed with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). Methods: A total of 21 dyslipidemia-related Mendelian genes, including FH causative genes (LDLR, APOB, and PCSK9) and LDL-altering genes (APOE, LDLRAP1, and ABCG5/8), were sequenced in 33 Japanese children (mean age, 9.7±4.2 years) with FH from 29 families. Results: Fifteen children (45.5%) with pathogenic variants in LDLR (eight different heterozygous variants) and one child (3.0%) with the PCSK9 variant were found. Among 17 patients without FH causative gene variants, 3 children had variants in LDL-altering genes, an APOE variant and two ABCG8 variants. The mean serum total cholesterol (280 vs 246 mg/dL), LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C, 217 vs 177 mg/dL), and non-HDL cholesterol (228 vs 188 mg/dL) levels were significantly higher in the pathogenic variant-positive group than in the variantnegative group. In the variant-positive group, 81.3% of patients had LDL-C levels ≥ 180 mg/dL but 35.3% in the variant-negative group. The mean LDL-C level was significantly lower in children with missense variants, especially with the p.Leu568Val variant, than in children with other variants in LDLR, whereas the LDL-altering variants had similar effects on the increase in serum LDL-C to LDLR p.Leu568Val. Conclusion: Approximately half of the children clinically diagnosed with FH had pathogenic variants in FH causative genes. The serum LDL-C levels tend to be high in FH children with pathogenic variations, and the levels are by the types of variants. Genetic analysis is useful; however, further study on FH without any variants is required.the LDL receptor (LDLR) 1) , apolipoprotein B (APOB) 2) , and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) 3) . LDLR is the main causative gene for FH 4) . In Japan, 54%-80% of adult patients with FH have pathogenic variants in LDLR or PCSK9 [5][6][7] .Patients with FH have high serum LDLcholesterol (LDL-C) levels from birth and are at risk of developing atherosclerosis at an earlier age than
. Hypertension is one of the most serious side effects of glucocorticoid therapy. We retrospectively investigated the frequency of hypertension during treatment of adrenal crisis and analyzed the factors associated with its development. Patients who were admitted for primary hypoadrenalism due to diagnosed or suspected adrenal crisis were included. In the analysis, the subjects were divided into two groups: the hypertensive group (group H) and non-hypertensive group (group Non-H). The primary endpoint was the difference in the hourly therapeutic hydrocortisone (HDC) dosage between the two groups. The hourly therapeutic HDC dose in the two groups was defined as the hourly HDC dose from the start of HDC infusion until the development of hypertension in group H or until the last blood pressure measurement in group Non-H. Nine of 19 crises led to hypertension. There was no significant difference in the therapeutic HDC dosage between the groups (p = 0.108). In conclusion, hypertension developed in some patients during treatment for adrenal crisis. There was no significant difference in the therapeutic HDC dosage between groups H and Non-H.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.