No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

IntroductionThe prevalence of surgical site infection (SSI) remains higher in gastrointestinal surgery than in other surgeries. Although several guidelines have indicated the efficacy of chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine in reducing the SSI rate, the optimal recommendation has still not been established. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the more effective antiseptic for surgical site preparation. Olanexidine (1.5% olanedine, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Factory, Tokushima, Japan), which is a new antiseptic in Japan, has antimicrobial activity against a wide range of bacteria, including Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Our study will contribute to determining a new antiseptic for use in gastrointestinal and other surgeries.Methods and analysisWe propose a multicentre, randomised controlled clinical trial for comparing two treatments, that is, 1.5% olanexidine or 10% povidone-iodine, for surgical skin preparation to prevent SSI in clean-contaminated gastrointestinal surgeries with surgical wounds. Patients aged ≥20 years at the time of consent will be included. The primary outcome measure is the 30-day postoperative SSI rate. For the primary analysis, which is aimed at comparing the treatment effects, the adjusted risk ratio and its 95% CI will be estimated using the Mantel-Haenszel method.Ethics and disseminationThe protocol was first approved by the Institutional Review Board of Keio University School of Medicine, followed by the institutional review board of each participating site. Participant recruitment began in June 2018. The final results will be published in international peer-reviewed medical journals.Trial registration numberUMIN 000031560; Pre-results.

Only few studies have addressed the surgical revascularization in patients with both connective tissue disease (CTD) and critical limb ischemia (CLI), and the evidence for the endovascular treatment (EVT) is lacking in such patients. The main purpose of this study is to assess our outcome of EVT in patients with CTD and ischemic leg ulcers and review the current situation of the revascularization in such patients. Medical records of 10 consecutive patients with coexistent CTD and CLI-related leg ulcers (in 11 limbs) treated endovascularly at our institution between 2009 and 2013 were reviewed retrospectively. The patients had rheumatoid arthritis (n?=?5), systemic lupus erythematosus (n?=?1), progressive systemic scleroderma (n?=?3), or polyarteritis nodosa (n?=?1). EVT was technically successful in all the cases. No procedure-related morbidity or mortality occurred. During the mean follow-up period of 26 months, there were no major amputations, and sustained clinical improvement (ulcer healing and reduction in Rutherford category) was observed in eight limbs. The overall 1-year rates of amputation-free survival and freedom from reintervention were 89 and 81%, respectively. In our series of patients with CTD and ischemic leg ulcers, EVT had acceptable outcomes and may be recommended as a safe and reasonably effective initial treatment option for such patients.

BackgroundSince the concept of intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasm (ITPN) was introduced in the current World Health Organization classification of tumors, the number of reports of ITPN occurrence has increased gradually. However, ITPN is usually located in the main pancreatic duct, with few reports of a branch duct ITPN. As a result, imaging protocols for the diagnosis of a branch duct ITPN have not been established.Case presentationWe report a case of a concurrent presentation of a branch duct ITPN and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) in the head of the pancreas, with a superior mesenteric artery (SMA) aneurysm. Initially, the cystic masses in the pancreatic head were diagnosed as branch duct IPMNs, with treatment consisting of a pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy, in combination with an aneurysmectomy performed for treatment of the SMA aneurysm. Pathological examination confirmed these cysts were a combination of branch-type ITPN and IPMN. The patient recovered from the treatment without complication, with no evidence of recurrence over a period of 34 months post-surgery.ConclusionThis case report of a synchronous presentation of an ITPN and IPMN indicates the difficulty in differentiating these two types of neoplasms in the branch duct of the pancreatic head.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS External iliac artery (EIA) limb deployment during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is associated with an increased risk of limb occlusion. Japanese patients are thought to have a higher incidence of EIA limb deployment during EVAR and a higher incidence of limb occlusion than Caucasians. It is suggested that a helical stent with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene should be used in patients with a small EIA, such as Japanese patients, to reduce the risk of EIA limb occlusion. Clinicians can put these findings to immediate clinical use. This study also serves as a baseline for similar studies of other stent graft designs. Objective/Background: It was hypothesised that a helical stent with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) grafts could provide a preventive effect for external iliac artery (EIA) limb occlusion following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). Therefore, a post-hoc analysis of a Japanese multicentre database was conducted to assess the impact of the stent graft design on EIA limb occlusion rates. Methods: Patients who underwent EVAR with EIA limb deployment between 2008 and 2016 were evaluated. The stent graft limbs were divided into two groups: group A comprised stent graft limbs made of a helical stent with ePTFE grafts (Excluder; n ¼ 255), and group B comprised stent graft limbs made of a Z stent with polyester grafts (Zenith, Flex and Endurant; n ¼ 173). The main outcome was the incidence of limb occlusion and severe limb stenosis (EIA related limb complications). The risk factors for EIA related limb complications were analysed and the midterm results between groups A and B compared. FineeGray generalisation of the proportional hazards model was used after propensity score matching to calculate the hazard ratio (HR). Results: One complication occurred in group A and 10 complications occurred in group B. The risk factors for EIA related limb complications for the entire group were a stent graft limb size 10 mm (HR 5.41; p ¼ .01) and inclusion in group B (HR 14.9; p ¼ .009). After propensity matching, group A (n ¼ 159) was matched with group B (n ¼ 159). The cumulative incidence function of EIA related limb complications at five years was 0.66% in group A and 7.8% in group B (HR 8.67; p ¼ .039). Conclusion: Stent graft design can affect limb patency in EIA limb deployment. When EIA limb deployment is necessary for patients with a small EIA, such as Japanese patients, stent graft limbs made of a helical stent with ePTFE should be used to reduce the risk of limb occlusion.