The efficacy of flow diversion (FD) in the treatment of paraclinoid aneurysms has been established. The pipeline embolization device (PED) is one of the most commonly used FD devices. Coil embolization is also useful for treating paraclinoid aneurysms. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of PED treatment and coil embolization for large unruptured paraclinoid aneurysms. This was a single-center, retrospective study of large unruptured paraclinoid aneurysms treated endovascularly between 2009 and 2019 (coil embolization between 2009 and 2015, and PED between 2015 and 2019). Cases with a follow-up period of less than 1 year and recurrence after coil embolization were excluded. The treatment outcomes between coil embolization and PED were compared. We investigated 45 patients with 45 large unruptured paraclinoid aneurysms treated by endovascular surgery in our institution. Twenty-four patients were treated with coil embolization and 21 with PED. In the PED group, the device cost was significantly lower (2,770.4 ± 699.5 vs. 1941.2 ± 552.8 [1000 yen], P = 0.03), procedure duration was significantly shorter (155.4 ± 66.7 vs. 95.1 ± 35.4 min, P <0.01), and the numbers of re-treatments were lower than those in the coil embolization group (41.7 vs. 14.3%, P = 0.05). Both PED and coil embolization were effective and safe for large unruptured paraclinoid aneurysms, and their treatment results were similar. The PED is more beneficial because of its lower cost, shorter procedure duration, and fewer retreatments, and is therefore more useful for the treatment of large unruptured paraclinoid aneurysms.
Vertebral artery (VA)-posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) aneurysms are rare lesions that are difficult to treat with both endovascular and surgical techniques. Tight angulation of the PICA from VA may make access to the PICA difficult from ipsilateral VA if adjunctive techniques are needed. Recently, the safety and efficacy of retrograde access have been reported. We report a case of endovascular treatment for a VA-PICA aneurysm with a stent-assisted technique using retrograde access via contralateral persistent primitive proatlantal artery (PPA). The patient was a 76-year-old woman with an unruptured VA-PICA aneurysm on the dominant VA side. Coil embolization with a stent-assisted technique using retrograde access seemed appropriate. However, the origin of the left VA was not confirmed. Left common carotid artery angiography demonstrated that the PPA (type 1) branching from external carotid artery joined the VA V4 segment. Retrograde access via the PPA for stenting was performed. A microcatheter for stenting was retrogradely advanced to the right PICA at ease. After deploying the stent, coil insertion was completed from the right VA, and the final angiogram showed adequate occlusion of the aneurysm with preservation of the PICA. Thus, PPA may be an approach route in the treatment of VA-PICA aneurysms with unconfirmed contralateral VA orifice and apparent PPA on angiography, when retrograde access is needed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.