This study aimed to assess the effect of varicocelectomy and/or mast cells (MCs) stabilizer on sperm DNA fragmentation in infertile men with varicocele (Vx). Overall, 120 infertile patients were randomized to three equal treatment arms; patients that underwent varicocelectomy, patients on 1 mg ketotifen twice daily for three months, and patients that underwent varicocelectomy followed with 1 mg ketotifen twice daily for three months. These patients were subjected to history taking, clinical examination, semen analysis, and estimation of sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI). After 3 months, all investigated groups showed significant improvement regarding the mean total sperm count, sperm concentration, total sperm motility, and sperm normal forms percentage compared with the pre-treatment data. As well, the mean sperm DFI was significantly improved compared with the pre-treatment data; in men that underwent varicocelectomy (34.6% vs. 28.3%), in men on MC stabilizer only (33.4% vs. 27.8%), and in men that underwent varicocelectomy followed by MC stabilizer (34.3% vs. 25.1%). Sperm DFI improvement percentages showed the highest improvement in men that underwent varicocelectomy followed with MC stabilizer compared with the other two groups (26.8% vs. 18.2%, 16.8%). Sperm DFI improvement percentages showed significant increases in the infertile patients with Vx grade III compared to Vx grade II in all investigated groups. It is concluded that in infertile men associated with Vx and high sperm DFI, surgical repair followed with MCs stabilizer significantly improve sperm DFI compared with either surgical repair or MCs stabilizer alone.
Diabetes mellitus is a common chronic disease, affecting 0.5-2% worldwide. The Massachusetts Male Aging Study reported that up to 75% of men with diabetes have a lifetime risk of developing ED. Type 2 diabetes is associated with low total serum testosterone (TT) identified in several cross-sectional studies and systemic analyses. There is a lack of consensus regarding what constitutes the lowest level of testosterone within the boundaries of normality. In this retrospective study, we sought to evaluate the effect of associated co-morbidities on serum total testosterone (TT) level in men with type 2 diabetes DM, either with or without erectile dysfunction (ED). Three hundred and ninety-one patients were evaluated for erectile function using an abridged, five-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function-5. Measurements of TT, fasting lipid profile, blood sugar and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) were conducted. Penile hemodynamics was assessed using intracavernosal injection and penile duplex study. Hypogonadism was found in 126 cases (33.2%), and normal TT was observed in 254 (66.8%). ED was detected in 119 cases in the hypogonadal group (94.4%) as compared to 155/254 (61.0%) in eugonadal group, P = 0.0001. TT was lower in diabetic men with ED as compared to those with normal erectile function (EF), 392.4 ± 314.9 versus 524.3 ± 140.2 ng dl(-1) , respectively, P < 0.0001. After exclusion of patients with hypertension and dyslipidaemia, 185 men were evaluated, and there was no difference in the mean TT level among men with ED 490.6 ± 498.2 ng dl(-1) versus normal EF 540.6 ± 133.4 ng dl(-1) although, HbA1c remained lower in men with normal erectile function. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of TT in men without associated co-morbidities showed that EF was compromised at TT = 403.5 ng dl(-1) or less. Sensitivity of 63.3% and a specificity of 94.0% were detected. At this level, ED was found in 33/38 (86.8%) men with TT 403.5 ng dl(-1) , whereas ED was observed in 57/147 (38.8%) men with TT ≥ 403.5 ng dl(-1) (P < 0.0001). We propose a cut-off value of 403.5 ng dl(-1) of TT blood levels as an indicator for initiation of testosterone replacement therapy in diabetic men with ED. Further prospective controlled trials are recommended.
Background: There has been recent interest in the use of botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) in the field of Andrology, whereby it has been investigated in the treatment of penile retraction and premature ejaculation.Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intracavernosal BoNT-A injection in the treatment of patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) refractory to oral phosphodiesterase inhibitors (PDE5Is). Patients and methods: A double-blind randomized placebo-controlled prospective comparative study conducted at one center and involved 70 patients with ED refractory to PDE5Is. At baseline, the following data were collected: erection hardness score (EHS), peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV), sexual health inventory for men (SHIM), and the sexual encounter profile 2&3 (SEP-2&3) questionnaires. Treatment group (n = 35) received a single ICI of 100 units of BoNT-A in 2 ml of saline and control group (n = 35) received a single ICI of 2 ml of saline. EHS, PSV, and EDV were assessed at 2 weeks post treatment. SHIM, SEP-2, SEP-3, and global assessment questionnaire (GAQ-Q1&Q2) were completed at 2-, 6-, and 12-weeks post treatment.Results: Two weeks post treatment, the treatment group showed a statistically significant improvement in the mean EHS, PSV, EDV, and GAQ-Q1 positive responders (p < 0.001) compared to the control group. At 6-and 12-weeks post treatment, the treatment group showed a statistically significant improvement in the SHIM scores, SEP-2, and GAQ-Q1&Q2 positive responders compared to the control group. At 6 weeks, where there was a 5-point improvement in the mean SHIM score of the treatment group (10±5.9 from 5.4±1.7 at baseline) versus no improvement in the placebo group, 18 patients in the treatment group (53%) were able to have an erection hard enough for vaginal penetration versus only one patient in the control group. Conclusion:BoNT-A is safe and effective as a potential treatment for ED refractory to PDE5I therapy.
PurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate sexual desire in a sample of married Egyptian women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). Patients and methodsThis study was carried out on 85 married Egyptian women with PCOS and 63 normal married women (the control group) recruited from the gynecology and obstetrics clinic in Kasr El-Aini Hospital, Cairo University. Every case was subjected to full medical history, full sexual history, general and local examinations, and investigated for serum levels of luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and testosterone. Pelvic ultrasound was performed and BMI was calculated. Each case was interviewed using a structured interview to answer the translated Arabic version of Female Sexual Desire Questionnaire (FSDQ) developed by Goldhammer and McCabe (2011). ResultsTotal FSDQ score showed significantly higher level in the control group compared with the PCOS group (Po0.001). Except for the solitary desire score, which was higher in the PCOS group than in the control group (P = 0.02), all other domains of the FSDQnamely, dyadic desire, resistance, positive relationship, concern, and sexual self-image -exhibited statistically significantly higher level in the control group ((Po0.001) than in the PCOS group. Among PCOS women, there was significantly higher FSDQ score among women without androgenic alopecia (P = 0.02) and with normal testosterone level (P = 0.04). Conclusion PCOS had a negative impact on female sexual desire. Although PCOS patients suffered from hyperandrogenism, they experienced decreased sexual desire, lacked the responsive sexual desire, and were less satisfied with the relationship with their partner. They were less confident with their bodies and experienced distress in relation to their sexual desire level. The presence of higher level of testosterone or androgenic alopecia in PCOS women is associated with reduced sexual desire.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.