RANTES (regulated on activation normal T cell expressed) has been found at elevated levels in biological fluids from patients with a wide range of allergic and autoimmune diseases and is able to attract several subtypes of leukocytes including eosinophils and monocytes into inflamed tissue. Amino-terminal modifications of RANTES produce receptor antagonists which are candidates for blocking this cellular recruitment. Met-RANTES has been shown to modulate inflammation in vivo, while AOP-RANTES is a potent inhibitor of R5 human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) strains and has been shown to down-modulate CCR5 and prevent recycling of the receptor. We have studied the effect of AOP-RANTES in eosinophil activation and have found that it is able to efficiently elicit eosinophil effector functions through CCR3, as measured by the release of reactive oxygen species and calcium mobilization, whereas Met-RANTES is inactive in these assays. AOP-RANTES is found to inhibit CCR3-mediated HIV-1 infection with moderate potency, in contrast to its potent inhibition of CCR5-mediated HIV-1 infection. Furthermore, we have investigated the abilities of these modified proteins to down-modulate CCR1 and CCR3 from the surface of monocytes and eosinophils. We show here that AOP-RANTES is much less effective than RANTES in down-modulation of CCR1. Surprisingly, recycling of CCR1 was minimal after incubation with RANTES while there was complete recycling with AOP-RANTES. In the case of CCR3, no significant difference was found between RANTES and AOP-RANTES in down-modulation and recycling. It therefore appears that trafficking of RANTES receptors follows different patterns, which opens up potential new targets for therapeutic intervention.Chemokines are chemotactic proteins that play a central role in immune and inflammatory responses by the attraction and activation of leukocytes. They can be divided into two major classes on the basis of the arrangement of the amino acid cysteine in the amino-terminal region: the CXC and CC chemokines, and two minor subclasses, each comprising a single member, the C and CX3C subclasses (1-3). Initially, it was generally accepted that the chemokine subclasses differ in their biological activity to stimulate different kinds of leukocytes, so that CXC chemokines are mediators of acute inflammation through neutrophil activation while the CC chemokines mediate chronic inflammation by attracting leukocytes such as eosinophils, monocytes, lymphocytes, basophils, and dendritic cells. However, this paradigm has recently been shown to have exceptions; for example, CXCR3 is expressed on activated T cells (4) and neutrophils can be activated by CC chemokines following stimulation with interferon-␥ (5).Chemokines mediate their effects by binding to cell-surface receptors that belong to the seven-transmembrane domain G protein-coupled receptor superfamily (1). More recently, chemokine receptors have been subject to intense scrutiny following the discovery that several of them are co-receptors for HIV 1 cell entr...

Cytokines and chemokines are responsible for the attraction and activation of eosinophils in allergic and inflammatory diseases. Whereas cytokines such as IL-3, IL-5, and GM-CSF activate eosinophils via heterodimeric receptors containing a distinct α-chain (binding domain) and a common β-chain (signaling domain), chemokines such as eotaxin activate eosinophils via seven-transmembrane Gi protein-coupled CCRs. Recent studies have demonstrated the importance of CCR3 on human eosinophils that undergo receptor recycling after chemokine activation, but the modulation of this receptor by cytokines has not yet been addressed. In this study, we demonstrate that IL-3 induces a dose- and time-dependent down-regulation of CCR3 from the surface of human eosinophils comparable to the CCR3-specific ligand eotaxin, whereas IL-5, GM-CSF, IL-4, IL-10, IL-13, IFN-γ, and TNF-α had no effect. Maximal down-regulation of CCR3 in response to IL-3 was reached at 24 h. Reduction of CCR3 surface protein in response to IL-3 could be prevented by an anti-IL-3 mAb and was neither due to the release of CC chemokines nor to nonspecific binding of IL-3 to CCR3. Moreover, down-regulation was prevented by phenylarsine oxide, a nonspecific inhibitor of receptor internalization. After 24 h, IL-3-induced decrease of CCR3 surface expression correlated with diminished mRNA expression, suggesting a transcriptional regulation mechanism. Since wortmannin partially inhibited IL-3- but not eotaxin-induced CCR3 down-regulation, receptor down-modulation seems to underlie different signaling events. Therefore, these data suggest a novel role for the cytokine IL-3 in the activation process of eosinophils and its predominant chemokine receptor CCR3.

There is increasing evidence for a role of pulmonary surfactant in asthma and allergic inflammation. In murine asthma models, recent studies have demonstrated that surfactant components downregulate the allergic inflammation. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that in individuals with mild asthma, a natural porcine surfactant preparation (Curosurf) given before segmental allergen challenge can reduce the allergic airway inflammation. Ten patients with asthma and five healthy control subjects were treated in two segments with either Curosurf or vehicle followed by local allergen challenge. Six additional patients with asthma received Curosurf before allergen challenge in one segment as above, but the second segment was instilled with Curosurf without allergen challenge. Unexpectedly, surfactant treatment augmented the eosinophilic inflammation 24 hours after allergen challenge. A direct chemotactic effect of Curosurf was excluded. However, levels of eotaxin and interleukin-5 were increased in bronchoalveolar lavage after Curosurf treatment, whereas IFN-gamma-levels and numbers of IFN-gamma(+) T cells were decreased. Curosurf had no influence on spreading and retention of allergen determined by allergen uptake in mice. These findings demonstrate that treatment with a natural porcine surfactant results in an augmentation of the eosinophilic inflammation after allergen challenge that is more likely due to immunomodulatory effects than to biophysical properties of the surfactant.

As many new biologically active chemokines have been cloned exploring the genomic DNA sequence database in the vicinity of already known chemokine sequences without demonstrating their natural origin, it is important to transfer findings from in vitro experiments with chemokines into the in vivo situation. With respect to eosinophils and fibroblasts that play an important part in the pathogenesis of allergic and autoimmune diseases, the role of the recently discovered members of the eotaxin family, eotaxin-2 and eotaxin-3, is not really understood. In order to elucidate the origin and biologic potency of the eotaxin family this study was performed. Conventional reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analysis was suitable to detect mRNA for eotaxin and eotaxin-3 but not for eotaxin-2 in dermal fibroblasts. In contrast to conventional reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, LightCycler analysis revealed that dermal fibroblasts constitutively expressed mRNA not only for eotaxin and eotaxin-3 but also for eotaxin-2. Moreover, with this technique we investigated mRNA expression levels after stimulation of fibroblasts with interleukin-4 and interleukin-4 plus tumor necrosis factor-alpha: the rank order of expression levels within the eotaxin family was eotaxin > eotaxin-3 > eotaxin-2. To address the question of the efficacy of eotaxin-3, we compared its activity with eotaxin, eotaxin-2, monocyte chemotactic protein-3, monocyte chemotactic protein-4, and RANTES in different test systems for eosinophils. The efficacy of the CC chemokines at equimolar concentrations with respect to the chemotactic response of human eosinophils was eotaxin-3 = eotaxin = eotaxin-2 > RANTES > monocyte chemotactic protein-4. The rank order of activity with respect to actin polymerization and release of toxic reactive oxygen species was eotaxin-3 = eotaxin = eotaxin-2 and eotaxin = eotaxin-2 > eotaxin-3 = monocyte chemotactic protein-3 = monocyte chemotactic protein-4 = RANTES, respectively. This study indicated a distinct profile in expression levels of the members of the eotaxin family in dermal fibroblasts. Indeed, all three eotaxin ligands demonstrated activation of human eosinophils with similar efficacies for chemotaxis, cytoskeletal rearrangements, activation of Gi proteins and transients of [Ca2+]i, but a distinct profile of activity with respect to the binding to CCR3 and the release of toxic reactive oxygen species. These findings may help to understand further the role of CC chemokines in fibroblast/eosinophil activation, which is of interest particularly in allergic and autoimmune diseases.

CCR3 is responsible for tissue infiltration of eosinophils, basophils, mast cells, and Th2 cells, particularly in allergic diseases. In this context, CCR3 has emerged as a target for the treatment of allergic asthma. It is well known that the N-terminal domain of chemokines is crucial for receptor binding and, in particular, its activation. Based on this background, we investigated a number of N-terminally truncated or modified peptides derived from the chemokine CCL14/hemofiltrate CC chemokine-1 for their ability to modulate the activity of CCR3. Among 10 derivatives tested, n-nonanoyl (NNY)-CCL14[10–74] (NNY-CCL14) was the most potent at evoking the release of reactive oxygen species and inducing chemotaxis of human eosinophils. In contrast, NNY-CCL14 has inactivating properties on human eosinophils, because it is able to induce internalization of CCR3 and to desensitize CCR3-mediated intracellular calcium release and chemotaxis. In contrast to naturally occurring CCL11, NNY-CCL14 is resistant to degradation by CD26/dipeptidyl peptidase IV. Because inhibition of chemokine receptors through internalization is a reasonable therapeutic strategy being pursued for HIV infection, we tested a potential inhibitory effect of NNY-CCL14 in two murine models of allergic airway inflammation. In both OVA- and Aspergillus fumigatus-sensitized mice, i.v. treatment with NNY-CCL14 resulted in a significant reduction of eosinophils in the airways. Moreover, airway hyper-responsiveness was shown to be reduced by NNY-CCL14 in the OVA model. It therefore appears that an i.v. administered agonist internalizing and thereby inhibiting CCR3, such as NNY-CCL14, has the potential to alleviate CCR3-mediated diseases.

The C3a anaphylatoxin is a potent proinflammatory mediator derived from the complement system inducing biologic effects of human eosinophils like Ca2+ transients and the activation of the respiratory burst. These findings support an important role for C3a in diseases typically associated with a peripheral blood or tissue eosinophilia. Synthetic human C3a analogue peptides with variations at the C-terminal effector domain have been evaluated with respect to their binding affinity and signaling potency on human eosinophils. Flow cytometrical analysis and RT-PCR revealed that the C3a receptor is constitutively expressed on human eosinophils. Peptides bearing an N-terminal 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl and the 6-aminohexanoyl motif were the most powerful peptides tested. Amino acid replacements in the conserved C-terminal pentapeptide decreased binding affinity and functional potency substantially. In addition, synthetic C3a analogue peptides induced C3aR internalization, led to transient changes of intracellular Ca2+ concentration, and did release reactive oxygen species in human eosinophils indicating the in vivo relevance of C3a-related sequences. The tripeptide LAR was found to be essential for C3a receptor binding on human eosinophils. Moreover, the putative binding motif of C3a anaphylatoxin is also crucial for the induction of biologic effects in the human system such as changes of intracellular Ca2+ concentration and the release of reactive oxygen species. This study demonstrates that the carboxyl terminus is important for the interaction with the C3aR and the biologic potency of C3a anaphylatoxin in the human system and plays a key role in the activation process of human eosinophils.

The chemokine subclasses differ in their biological activity to stimulate different kinds of effector cells via distinct chemokine receptors. Controversial results about the expression of the CC chemokine receptor CCR3 on the surface of human neutrophils have been described. To find out whether eosinophil contamination might be responsible for these diverse observations, CCR3 expression on highly purified neutrophils and eosinophils was investigated. We enriched neutrophils from a heterogeneous granulocyte population with immunomagnetic beads coated with various anti‐CD52 monoclonal antibodies. This procedure was suitable to enrich neutrophils with a purity of up to 99.85%. Reverse transcriptase‐PCR revealed that CCR3 mRNA was not expressed by CD52‐negative selected neutrophils. In contrast to these cells, CCR3 mRNA could be detected in a heterogeneous granulocyte population and CD16‐negative selected eosinophils. In addition, spectrofluorometric measurement of intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i) demonstrated that CD52‐negative selected neutrophils did not show a transient [Ca2+]i increase following stimulation with the CCR3 ligand eotaxin, whereas the heterogeneous granulocyte population as well as eosinophils did respond. Therefore, previous studies demonstrating the expression of CCR3 on human neutrophils have to be re‐evaluated because CCR3 mRNA detection on human neutrophils due to contamination by mRNA from eosinophils could not be excluded.

CC chemokine receptors are expressed on hematopoietic cells, and these may impart selective homing of monocyte, leukocyte, and lymphocyte subsets to sites of inflammation. CC chemokine receptor 3 is the major receptor on eosinophils and is also expressed on other inflammatory cells suggesting its important role for allergic diseases such as atopic dermatitis and bronchial asthma. Eotaxin, eotaxin-2 and eotaxin-3 have been identified as ligands that only activate CC chemokine receptor 3. CC chemokine receptor 3 is also activated by other promiscuous ligands, however, such as RANTES and monocyte chemotactic protein 4. To date, CC chemokine receptor 3 has not been reported to be expressed on nonhematopoietic cells. In this study, we investigated whether keratinocytes possess autocrine and paracrine mechanisms for CC chemokine secretion and receptor expression as reported for the expression of interleukin 8 and its receptors. Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction analysis demonstrated that CC chemokine receptor 3 mRNA is expressed constitutively in cultured keratinocytes. The signal quantities of the CC chemokine receptor 3 amplicons showed lower intensities for keratinocytes than for eosinophils. In situ hybridization techniques exhibited that basal cell layers of the epidermis were stained homogeneously for CC chemokine receptor 3 mRNA with a decreasing signal to the upper epidermis showing that differentiating and proliferating keratinocytes did express mRNA specific for CC chemokine receptor 3. Immunohistochemical studies confirmed low expression of CC chemokine receptor 3 protein on epidermal keratinocytes compared to the high level observed on infiltrating eosinophils. Furthermore, stimulation of cultured keratinocytes with eotaxin resulted in an increased [3H]thymidine incorporation indicating a role of CC chemokine receptor 3 in epidermal proliferation and differentiation. These data demonstrate that CC chemokine receptor 3 is expressed not only on hematopoietic cells but also on keratinocytes as nonhematopoietic cells with ectodermal origin. Therefore, the identification of CC chemokine receptor 3 on epidermal keratinocytes may indicate a role for CC chemokine receptor 3 and its ligands in skin physiology and pathophysiology.