The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of departmental planning techniques on appropriate in-vivo source tracking error thresholds for high dose rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy (BT) treatments, and to determine if a single in-vivo source tracking error threshold would be appropriate for the same patient anatomy. Methods: The prostate, rectum, and urethra were contoured on a single patient transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) dataset. Anonymized DICOM files were disseminated to 16 departments who created an HDR prostate BT treatment plan on the dataset with a prescription dose of 15 Gy in a single fraction. Departments were asked to follow their own local treatment planning guidelines. Source positioning errors were then simulated in the 16 treatment plans and the effect on dose-volume histogram (DVH) indices calculated. Change in DVH indices were used to determine appropriate in-vivo source tracking error thresholds. Plans were considered to require intervention if the following DVH conditions occurred: prostate V100% < 90%, urethra D0.1cc > 118%, and rectum tt Dmax > 80%. Results: There was wide variation in appropriate in-vivo source tracking error thresholds among the 16 participating departments, ranging from 1 to 6 mm. Appropriate in-vivo source tracking error thresholds were also found to depend on the direction of the source positioning error and the endpoint. A robustness parameter was derived, and found to correlate with the sensitivity of plans to source positioning errors. Conclusions: A single HDR prostate BT in-vivo source tracking error threshold cannot be applied across multiple departments, even for the same patient anatomy. The burden on in-vivo source tracking devices may be eased through improving HDR prostate BT plan robustness during the plan optimisation phase.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine a comprehensive in vivo source tracking error thresholds in high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for cervical cancer. Achieving this enables the definition of an action level for imminent in vivo source tracking technologies and treatment monitoring devices, preventing clinically relevant changes to the applied dose. Material and methods Retrospective HDR interstitial ( n = 10) and intra-cavitary ( n = 20) cervical brachytherapy patients were randomly selected to determine the feasibility of implementing in vivo source tracking error thresholds. A script was developed to displace all dwell positions in each treatment plan, along all major axes from their original position. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) indices were calculated without re-optimization of modified plans to determine the appropriate in vivo source tracking error thresholds in each direction. Results In vivo source tracking error thresholds were directionally dependent; the smallest were found to be 2 mm in the anterior and posterior directions for both interstitial and intra-cavitary treatments. High-risk clinical treatment volume (HR-CTV) coverage was significantly impacted by displacements of 4 to 5 mm along each axis. Critically, there was a large variation in DVH metrics with displacement due to change in dwell weightings and patient anatomy. Conclusions Determining the dosimetric impact of dwell position displacement provides a clinical benchmark for the development of pre-treatment verification devices and an action level for real-time treatment monitoring. It was established that an in vivo source tracking error threshold needs to be patient-specific. In vivo source tracking error thresholds should be determined for each patient, and can be conducted with extension of the method established in this work.