Background Early reports have shown that critically ill patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 have a high prevalence of nosocomial pneumonia, particularly ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP ). Method In the present study, we determined the bacterial agents isolated in endotracheal aspirate (ETA) cultures of Covid-19 general intensive care patients and evaluated the antibiotic resistance profiles of common bacterial agents compared to the pre-pandemic period. Results While a total of 119 significant growths with polymicrobial growths were detected in the ETA cultures of 73 (7.5%) of 971 patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit before the pandemic, 87 significant growths were detected in the ETA cultures of 67 (11.1%) of 602 patients hospitalized in the Covid-19 intensive care unit (ICU) after the pandemic. While 61 (83.6%) of patients in the ICU died before the pandemic, 63 (94.0%) of patients in the Covid-19 ICU died after the pandemic. In terms of age, gender, and mortality, there was no significant difference between the two ICUs (p > 0.05). Before the pandemic, the mean length of stay in the ICU was 33.59 ± 32.89 days, and after the pandemic, it was 13.49 ± 8.03 days. This was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). Acinetobacter baumannii (28.5%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (22.6%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (15.9%), Staphylococcus aureus (6.7%), Escherichia coli (7.5%), Candida spp. (5.0%) were the most prevalent causal bacteria discovered in pre-pandemic ICU ETA samples, whereas A. baumannii (54.0%), K. pneumoniae (10.3%), P. aeruginosa (6.8%), E. faecium (8%), and Candida spp.(13.7%) were the most common causative microorganisms detected in Covid-19 ICU ETA samples. Except for tigecycline, antibiotic resistance rates in A. baumannii strains increased following the pandemic. Only tobramycin showed a significant difference in the increase of resistance among these antibiotics (p = 0.037). The rate of tigecycline resistance, on the other hand, was 17.6% before the pandemic and 2.2% afterward (p < 0.05). After the pandemic, increased resistance of K. pneumoniae strains to colistin, meropenem, ertapenem, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, piperacillin-tazobactam, ciprofloxacin, tigecycline, and cefepime antibiotics was observed. However, these increases were not statistically significant. Except for imipenem, antibiotic resistance rates in P. aeruginosa strains increased following the pandemic. The resistance rise of the antibiotics ceftazidime and levofloxacin was shown to be significantly different (p < 0.05). Conclusion ...

Background and objectives Many mutations in variants for instance Delta and Alpha are associated with immune evasion and higher infectious potential. There are uncertainties regarding Omicron. In this regard, we aimed to compare the frequency of reinfection of SARS CoV-2 variants in our hospital between April 22, 2021 and January 26, 2022. Method The reinfection rates and demographic characteristics of a total of 27,487 COVID-19 patients infected with different SARS CoV-2 variants were examined. Results Reinfection was found in 26 (0.46%) of 5554 Alpha, 209 (1.16%) of 17,941 Delta, and 520 (13.0%) of 3992 Omicron variants. A statistically significant difference was observed between the reinfection rates of the variants (p = 0.000). The mean reinfection days were calculated as 204.4 ± 51.1 in the Alpha variant, 291.2 ± 58.2 in the Delta variant, and 361.2 ± 131.6 in the Omicron variant (p = 0.000). It was observed that 16.5% of reinfection cases caught COVID-19 for the second time 3-6 months after the first COVID-19 infection, 36.7% after 6-12 months, and 46.8% after more than 12 months. There was a significant difference between the times in reinfection cases. Most reinfections occurred more than 12 months apart. Among those with a reinfection time > 12 months, 0% had Alpha, 3.4% had Delta, and 96.6% had Omicron variants. Conclusion The highest reinfection rate was observed in the Omicron variant. Reinfection was approximately 30 times more frequent in the Omicron variant than in the Alpha variant and 10 times more frequent in the Delta variant.

The exposure of healthcare workers (HCWs) to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus‐2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) has been a major concern since the beginning of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic. The study aimed to investigate the relationship between vaccination status and the status of catching COVID‐19 in HCWs working in a Training and Research Hospital in Turkey, and the clinical course of the disease in those who were caught. The vaccination status of 1279 HCWs working at Siirt Training and Research Hospital during the period when the SARS‐CoV‐2 Delta variant was dominant, their cases of catching COVID‐19 during this period, and the clinical course of the disease in patients with COVID‐19 were investigated retrospectively.  We found that the rate of COVID‐19 transmission was lowest in fully vaccinated HCWs ( p < 0.05). The rate of COVID‐19 transmission in HCWs who received two doses of BioNTech vaccine (4.4%) and two doses of CoronaVac+ one dose of BioNTech vaccines (2.7%) was considerably lower than those without vaccination (26.2%) ( p < 0.05). The transmission rate was lowest among those vaccinated with two doses of CoronaVac+ one dose of BioNTech. Hospitalization was not required in fully vaccinated HCWs. The lymphocyte count was found to be significantly higher in fully vaccinated patients than incompletely vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. Although C‐reactive protein (CRP), d ‐dimer, and ferritin values were higher in unvaccinated and partially vaccinated patients than in fully vaccinated patients, the differences were not statistically significant. As a result, the transmission rate of COVID‐19 was lowest in fully vaccinated HCWs and in those vaccinated with two doses of CoronaVac+ one dose of BioNTech. In fully vaccinated HCWs, hospitalization was not needed.

In this study, the relationship between viral load, demographic characteristics, and disease information in 1007 (48.5%) patients with Delta variant (B.1.617.2), and 1070 (51.5%) patients with Alpha variant (B1.1.7) were investigated. We found that there was a significant difference in viral load between patients who died from the Alpha variant and those who were discharged (p < 0.05). Nevertheless, no significant difference was observed in patients with the Delta variant. The viral load in patients who died from the Alpha variant was significantly higher than those who were discharged (p < 0.05). The viral load was found to be higher in females in patients with the Delta variant, whereas it was very close in males and females in patients with the Alpha variant (p > 0.05). No significant difference was detected between the cycle threshold values (Ct) and disease severity. In terms of the mean Ct values, statistical differences were observed in patients with Delta and Alpha variants. The Alpha variant was found to have a higher viral load than the Delta variant. Furthermore, the Delta variant was found to be higher in the 40-year-old and under-age group than the Alpha variant, whereas the Alpha variant was higher in the groups over 40 years old. Although the rate of moderate and severe patients in the Alpha variant was found to be higher, the rate of mild survivors was found to be higher in the Delta variant. In conclusion, the increase in vaccination before the appearance of the Delta variant in our region may have influenced the viral load and clinical status of the patients.

Older age (>60 years) has been identified as the main risk factor for COVID-19. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Pfizer–BioNTech and CoronaVac vaccines against COVID-19 infection, serious illness, and mortality in the geriatric population. We found that 2 doses of CoronaVac vaccine were ineffective in protecting against COVID-19 infection in people over 65 years of age, while the vaccine efficacy (VE) of the mRNA vaccine against COVID-19 was 80% (95% CI 70–87). The VE of full vaccination with BioNTech was 89% (95% CI 53–97) against hospitalization, 79% (95% CI 0–97) against death, and 79% (95% CI 0–97) against intensive care unit (ICU) admission. However, the VE of full vaccination with CoronaVac was 50% (95% CI 33–63) against hospitalization, 53% (95% CI 26–70) against ICU admission, and 56% (95% CI 30–73) against death. In conclusion, we found that the mRNA vaccine has higher efficacy against severe COVID-19 infection and mortality in the geriatric population than the inactivated vaccine. Booster doses of vaccines should be considered in increasing the effectiveness of inactivated vaccines. Given the potential of SARS-CoV-2 mutations evading vaccination protection and the risk of reduced immunity over time, regular monitoring of vaccine effectiveness in the real world is critical. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00284-023-03322-z.