Abbreviations: ASR = acute stress reaction CAR = Capabilities Assessment for Readiness MCI = mass-casualty incident PPE = personal protective equipment Abstract Introduction: Emergency preparedness can be defined by the preparedness pyramid, which identifies planning, infrastructure, knowledge and capabilities, and training as the major components of maintaining a high level of preparedness. The aim of this article is to review the characteristics of contingency plans for mass-casualty incidents (MCIs) and models for assessing the emergency preparedness of hospitals. Characteristics of Contingency Plans: Emergency preparedness should focus on community preparedness, a personnel augmentation plan, and communications and public policies for funding the emergency preparedness. The capability to cope with a MCI serves as a basis for preparedness for non-conventional events. Coping with chemical casualties necessitates decontamination of casualties, treating victims with acute stress reactions, expanding surge capacities of hospitals, and integrating knowledge through drills. Risk communication also is important. Assessment of Emergency Preparedness: An annual assessment of the emergency plan is required in order to assure emergency preparedness. Preparedness assessments should include: (1) elements of disaster planning; (2) emergency coordination; (3) communication; (4) training; (5) expansion of hospital surge capacity; (6) personnel; (7) availability of equipment; (8) stockpiles of medical supplies; and (9) expansion of laboratory capacities. The assessment program must be based on valid criteria that are measurable, reliable, and enable conclusions to be drawn. There are several assessment tools that can be used, including surveys, parameters, capabilities evaluation, and self-assessment tools. Summary: Healthcare systems are required to prepare an effective response model to cope with MCIs. Planning should be envisioned as a process rather than a production of a tangible product. Assuring emergency preparedness requires a structured methodology that will enable an objective assessment of the level of readiness. Adini B, Goldberg A, Laor D, Cohen R, Zadok R, Bar-Dayan Y: Assessing levels of hospital emergency preparedness. Prehosp Disast Mec/2006;21(6):451-457. November -December 2006 http://pdm.medicine.wisc.edu Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 452 Assessing Levels of Hospital Preparedness Adini

No abstract

Background: Autoimmune vasculitides cannot always be controlled by steroids and immunosuppressive drugs. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) treatment was found beneficial in several vasculitides including systemic and organ–specific diseases. In this article we tested whether the beneficial clinical response of IVIg treatment in vasculitides was accompanied by a decrease in vasculitis–associated autoantibody levels. Methods: Ten patients diagnosed as having vasculitis were treated with high–dose (2 g/kg) IVIg monthly, in a 5–day schedule. In all the patients, other therapeutic measures failed to control disease progression prior to IVIg treatment. Each patient received between 1 and 6 treatment courses. All patients were evaluated for the levels of 5 autoantibodies (Abs) related to vasculitis before and after each treatment course. Results: In 6 out of the 10 patients, a beneficial clinical response followed IVIg treatment. Moreover, no treatment–related adverse effects were observed in any of the patients. Anti–myeloperoxidase antibodies and cytoplasmic–antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies levels decreased concomitantly with the clinical improvement observed in the patients with Churg–Strauss vasculitis and Wegener’s granulomatosis, respectively. Levels of cytoplasmic–antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) with specificity for bacteridial/permeability–increasing protein and human lysosomal–associated membrane protein increased after each treatment course, but returned to normal values before the following one. Conclusions: When other therapeutic measures, such as immunosuppressive therapy, fails to control disease manifestations in patients with vasculitides, IVIg is a possible effective intervention method with a high response rate. IVIg probably exerted its effects on disease progression via different mechanisms. Among these mechanisms, a decrease in relevant Ab levels is often found (probably by anti–idiotypes in IVIg), and thus ANCA levels are expected to associate with disease activity.

No abstract

BackgroundDuring the last decade there has been a need to respond and recover from various types of emergencies including mass casualty events (MCEs), mass toxicological/chemical events (MTEs), and biological events (pandemics and bio-terror agents). Effective emergency preparedness is more likely to be achieved if an all-hazards response plan is adopted.ObjectivesTo investigate if there is a relationship among hospitals' preparedness for various emergency scenarios, and whether components of one emergency scenario correlate with preparedness for other emergency scenarios.MethodsEmergency preparedness levels of all acute-care hospitals for MCEs, MTEs, and biological events were evaluated, utilizing a structured evaluation tool based on measurable parameters. Evaluations were made by professional experts in two phases: evaluation of standard operating procedures (SOPs) followed by a site visit. Relationships among total preparedness and different components' scores for various types of emergencies were analyzed.ResultsSignificant relationships were found among preparedness for different emergencies. Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for biological events correlated with preparedness for all investigated emergency scenarios. Strong correlations were found between training and drills with preparedness for all investigated emergency scenarios.ConclusionsFundamental critical building blocks such as SOPs, training, and drill programs improve preparedness for different emergencies including MCEs, MTEs, and biological events, more than other building blocks, such as equipment or knowledge of personnel. SOPs are especially important in unfamiliar emergency scenarios. The findings support the adoption of an all-hazards approach to emergency preparedness.

On 17 August 1999 at 3:04 a.m., an earthquake of 7.4 magnitude (Richter scale) struck the Marmara region in Turkey. The city of Adapazari suffered 2,680 fatalities with approximately 5,300 injured. The Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) field hospital arrived at Adapazari, on day four after the quake. The team consisted of 102 personnel. The field hospital acted as a secondary referral centre. A total of 1,205 patients were treated in the field hospital between day four and day 14 of the earthquake. The frequency distribution of the medical problems seen in the field hospital was 32 per cent internal medicine, 13 per cent general surgery including plastic, 21 per cent orthopaedic surgery, 23 per cent paediatric disease, 10 per cent obstetrics and gynaecology and 1 per cent major psychiatric disorders. A mean number of 35 patients per day were hospitalised in the field hospital for between 24 hours to one week. The rapid establishment of the field hospital enabled the local medical facilities to 'buy time' in order to organise and restore surgical and hospitalisation abilities in this disastrous situation.

Rapid accumulation of EMS vehicles, effective primary triage between urgent and non-urgent casualties and primary distribution between five hospitals enabled rapid conclusion of the event, both at the scene and at the receiving hospitals.

No abstract