<p style="text-align: justify;">COVID-19 pandemic forces training for principals to be conducted online. This study aims to evaluate the context, input, process, response, study, behavior, and outcome to determine the effectiveness and make recommendations for training. The approach used in this study was a mixed method with a concurrent embedded design and a qualitative method as the main method. The subjects of this study were the principals, committees, and instructors. Data were collected through interviews, observations, and questionnaires and analyzed using Miles and Huberman's model, descriptive analysis, and a t-test. The results show that e-training is effective in context, input, and process. Response, learning, and attitude assessments prove that knowledge, skills, and attitude have improved. Participants will be able to implement the experience gained and impact school quality improvement. This study contributes to the combination of the two evaluation models proven to produce a complete result. The study for the e-training recommends needed assessment before the training, the activity before the training to acquire the skills in using the learning management system, and the monitoring and evaluation after the training.</p>
<span lang="EN-US">This study aimed to explain how students’ critical thinking, problem solving and communication skills can be developed through student development activities in online-based scientific discussion programs at universities. This study used a mix method approach with a sequential explanatory model. The research was conducted using quantitative methods in the first stage and then in the second stage using qualitative methods. Management discussion model was measured through questionnaires and interviews. The quantitative data analysis was employed to identify the effectiveness of the discussion model and its impact. The qualitative data analysis was carried out in three stages, namely data reduction, data presentation; and drawing conclusions. The research findings showed that the model of student development activities with online-based scientific discussion methods can significantly improve students’ critical thinking, problem solving, and communication skills. The results of this study indicated that universities provide opportunities for students to improve critical thinking skills, problem solving and communication skills through online-based scientific discussion programs.</span>
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.