As an indispensable tool for transcriptome-wide analysis of differential gene expression, RNA sequencing (RNAseq) has demonstrated great potential in clinical applications. However, the lack of multi-group RNA reference materials of biological relevance and the corresponding reference datasets for assessing the reliability of RNAseq hampers its wide clinical applications wherein the underlying biological differences among study groups are often small. As part of the Quartet Project for quality control and data integration of multiomic profiling, we established four RNA reference materials derived from immortalized B-lymphoblastoid cell lines from four members of a monozygotic twin family. Additionally, we constructed ratio-based transcriptome-wide reference datasets using multi-batch RNAseq datasets, providing "ground truth" for benchmarking. Moreover, Quartet-sample-based quality metrics were developed for assessing reliability of RNAseq technology in terms of intra-batch proficiency and cross-batch reproducibility. The small intrinsic biological differences among the Quartet samples enable sensitive assessment of performance of transcriptomic measurements. The Quartet RNA reference materials combined with the reference datasets can be served as unique resources for assessing data quality and improving reliability of transcriptomic profiling.

The implementation of quality control for multiomic data requires the widespread use of well-characterized reference materials, reference datasets, and related resources. The Quartet Data Portal was built to facilitate community access to such rich resources established in the Quartet Project. A convenient platform is provided for users to request the DNA, RNA, protein, and metabolite reference materials, as well as multi-level datasets generated across omics, platforms, labs, protocols, and batches. Interactive visualization tools are offered to assist users to gain a quick understanding of the reference datasets. Crucially, the Quartet Data Portal continuously collects, evaluates, and integrates the community-generated data of the distributed Quartet multiomic reference materials. In addition, the portal provides analysis pipelines to assess the quality of user-submitted multiomic data. Furthermore, the reference datasets, performance metrics, and analysis pipelines will be improved through periodic review and integration of multiomic data submitted by the community. Effective integration of the evolving technologies via active interactions with the community will help ensure the reliability of multiomics-based biological discoveries. The Quartet Data Portal is accessible at https://chinese-quartet.org.

Multiomics profiling is a powerful tool to characterize the same samples with complementary features orchestrating the genome, epigenome, transcriptome, proteome, and metabolome. However, the lack of ground truth hampers the objective assessment of and subsequent choice from a plethora of measurement and computational methods aiming to integrate diverse and often enigmatically incomparable omics datasets. Here we establish and characterize the first suites of publicly available multiomics reference materials of matched DNA, RNA, proteins, and metabolites derived from immortalized cell lines from a family quartet of parents and monozygotic twin daughters, providing built-in truth defined by family relationship and the central dogma. We demonstrate that the "ratio"-based omics profiling data, i.e., by scaling the absolute feature values of a study sample relative to those of a concurrently measured universal reference sample, were inherently much more reproducible and comparable across batches, labs, platforms, and omics types, thus empower the horizontal (within-omics) and vertical (cross-omics) data integration in multiomics studies. Our study identifies "absolute" feature quantitation as the root cause of irreproducibility in multiomics measurement and data integration, and urges a paradigm shift from "absolute" to "ratio"-based multiomics profiling with universal reference materials.

Batch effects are notorious technical variations that are common in multiomic data and may result in misleading outcomes. With the era of big data, tackling batch effects in multiomic integration is urgently needed. As part of the Quartet Project for quality control and data integration of multiomic profiling, we comprehensively assess the performances of seven batch-effect correction algorithms (BECAs) for mitigating the negative impact of batch effects in multiomic datasets, including transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics. Performances are evaluated based on accuracy of identifying differentially expressed features, robustness of predictive models, and the ability of accurately clustering cross-batch samples into their biological sample groups. Ratio-based method is more effective and widely applicable than others, especially in cases when batch effects are highly confounded with biological factors of interests. We further provide practical guidelines for the implementation of ratio-based method using universal reference materials profiled with study samples. Our findings show the promise for eliminating batch effects and enhancing data integration in increasingly large-scale, cross-batch multiomic studies.

Molecular subtyping of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is essential for understanding the mechanisms and discovering actionable targets of this highly heterogeneous type of breast cancer. We previously performed a large single-center and multiomics study consisting of genomics, transcriptomics, and clinical information from 465 patients with primary TNBC. To facilitate reusing this unique dataset, we provided a detailed description of the dataset with special attention to data quality in this study. The multiomics data were generally of high quality, but a few sequencing data had quality issues and should be noted in subsequent data reuse. Furthermore, we reconduct data analyses with updated pipelines and the updated version of the human reference genome from hg19 to hg38. The updated profiles were in good concordance with those previously published in terms of gene quantification, variant calling, and copy number alteration. Additionally, we developed a user-friendly web-based database for convenient access and interactive exploration of the dataset. Our work will facilitate reusing the dataset, maximize the values of data and further accelerate cancer research.

Multiomics profiling is a powerful tool to characterize the same samples with complementary features orchestrating the genome, epigenome, transcriptome, proteome, and metabolome. However, the lack of ground truth hampers the objective assessment of and subsequent choice from a plethora of measurement and computational methods aiming to integrate diverse and often enigmatically incomparable omics datasets. Here we establish and characterize the first suites of publicly available multiomics reference materials of matched DNA, RNA, proteins, and metabolites derived from immortalized cell lines from a family quartet of parents and monozygotic twin daughters, providing built-in truth defined by family relationship and the central dogma. We demonstrate that the "ratio"-based omics profiling data, i.e., by scaling the absolute feature values of a study sample relative to those of a concurrently measured universal reference sample, were inherently much more reproducible and comparable across batches, labs, platforms, and omics types, thus empower the horizontal (within-omics) and vertical (cross-omics) data integration in multiomics studies. Our study identifies "absolute" feature quantitation as the root cause of irreproducibility in multiomics measurement and data integration, and urges a paradigm shift from "absolute" to "ratio"-based multiomics profiling with universal reference materials.

As an indispensable tool for transcriptome-wide analysis of differential gene expression, RNA sequencing (RNAseq) has demonstrated great potential in clinical applications such as companion diagnostics and prognostics. However, there is a lack of certified RNA reference materials and the corresponding reference datasets of differential expression for assessing the reliability of RNAseq for its intended use in detecting intrinsically small biological differences in clinical settings such as molecular subtyping of diseases. As part of the Quartet Project for quality control and data integration of multiomics profiling, we established four RNA reference materials derived from immortalized B-lymphoblastoid cell lines from four members of a monozygotic twin family. Additionally, we constructed ratio-based transcriptome-wide reference datasets between two reference samples, providing "ground truth" for cross-platform and cross-lab proficiency test. Moreover, Quartet-sample-based quality metrics were developed for assessing the reliability of RNAseq technology in terms of intra-batch measurement and cross-batch data integration. The small intrinsic biological differences among the Quartet samples enabled sensitive assessment of performance of transcriptomic measurements and their cross-batch integration at the ratio level. The Quartet RNA reference materials combined with the ratio-based reference datasets can serve as unique resources for assessing data quality and improving reliability of transcriptomic profiling.

Various laboratory-developed metabolomic methods lead to big challenges in inter-laboratory comparability and effective integration of diverse datasets. As part of the Quartet Project, we established a publicly available suite of four metabolite reference materials derived from B-lymphoblastoid cell lines from a family quartet of parents and monozygotic twin daughters. We generated comprehensive LC-MS based metabolomic data from the Quartet reference materials using targeted and untargeted strategies in different laboratories. High variabilities in the qualitative and quantitative metabolomic measurements were observed across laboratories. Moreover, the Quartet multi-sample-based quality metrics were developed for objectively assessing the reliability of metabolomic profiling in detecting intrinsic biological differences among difference groups of samples. Importantly, the ratio-based metabolomic profiling, by scaling the absolute values of a study sample relative to those of a universal reference sample, enables data integration in long-term measurements across difference laboratories or platforms. Thus, we constructed the ratio-based high-confidence reference datasets between two reference samples, providing "ground truth" for inter-laboratory proficiency test, which enables objective assessment of various metabolomic methods. Our study provided the community with rich resources and best practice for objective assessment of inter-laboratory measurements and data integration, ensuring reliable large-scale and longitudinal metabolomic profiling.