ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of sintilimab combined with apatinib plus capecitabine in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to provide a more effective first-line treatment for patients with advanced HCC.MethodsThis open-label, prospective, phase II study included patients with unresectable HCC who did not receive systematic treatment. The patients were treated with sintilimab (200 mg, intravenous drip, once every 3 weeks) combined with apatinib (250 mg, oral administration, once a day) plus capecitabine (1000 mg/m2, twice a day; after 2 weeks of oral administration, the drug was stopped for 1 week; course of treatment, 3 weeks). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DoR), overall survival (OS), and safety.ResultsForty-seven patients (1 lost to follow-up) were enrolled in the study. As of March 1, 2022, the ORR and DCR were 50.0% (95% CI: 34.9–65.1%) and 91.3% (95% CI: 79.2–97.6%), respectively, after blind, independent imaging evaluation. The median follow-up time was 18.7 months (95% CI: 17.2–20.2 months). The median PFS was 9.0 months (95% CI: 7.1–10.9 months). The median DoR was 10.8 months (95% CI: 4.8–16.8 months). The median OS was not reached, and the 1-year OS rate was 71.7% (95% CI: 56.5–84.0%). Only 28.3% (13/46) of patients had grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events.ConclusionSintilimab combined with apatinib plus capecitabine has good safety and anti-tumor activity as a first-line treatment for unresectable HCC. This is worthy of further multi-center, prospective, randomized, large-sample clinical studies.Clinical Trial Registrationhttps://ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04411706.

Background: The relationship between the expression of nm23-H1 and the invasion and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still controversial. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to determine the prognostic value of nm23-H1 in patients with NSCLC. And to explore the relationship between the expression of nm23-H1 and clinicopathological features in patients with NSCLC. Methods: Literature search in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and WanFang database was performed up to June 14, 2021. Studies on the expression and clinical significance of nm23-H1 in NSCLC were included. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 2 researchers independently screened the literatures, extracted the data, and evaluated the quality. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software (Nordic Cochran Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark). Results: Twenty-five studies met our inclusion criteria and were finally included for the analysis, involving 2198 participants. Our meta-analysis revealed that nm23-H1 expression was associated with tumor differentiation (OR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.42–0.70, P < .00001), TNM stage (OR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.23–2.34, P = .001), and lymph node status (OR = 0.26, 95% CI, 0.17–0.39, P < .00001), but have no associate with sex, age, pathological type, and T stages. Additionally, low nm23-H1 expression reduced the 3-year survival rate (OR = 2.74, 95% CI: 1.54–4.86, P = .0006) and 5-year survival rate (OR = 2.78, 95% CI: 1.36–5.69, P = .005). Conclusion: Nm23-H1 can be used as a biomarker to predict tumor invasiveness and evaluate the prognosis of patients with NSCLC.

Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy is still the standard treatment for stage III-N2 nonsmall cell lung cancer after R0 resection, and it is still controversial whether conventional adjuvant radiotherapy is needed. We used meta-analysis to try to answer whether adjuvant postoperative chemoradiotherapy (POCRT) can bring survival benefits to patients with stage III-N2 nonsmall cell lung cancer after R0 resection.Methods: Up to June 25, 2021, the databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang were searched, and clinical studies on POCRT for stage III-N2 nonsmall cell lung cancer were included. RevMan5.4 software was used for meta-analysis.Results: A total of 8959 patients were included in 5 randomized controlled trials and 17 retrospective studies. The results of the meta-analysis showed that POCRT could improve 3 and 5 years overall survival (OS) rate (OR = 1.52, 95%CI: 1.05-2.20; OR = 1.30, 95%CI: 1.16-1.46), 3 and 5 years disease-free survival (DFS) rate (OR = 1.34, 95%CI: 1.01-1.76; OR = 1.74, 95%CI: 1.43-2.12), and 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) rate (OR = 2.69, 95%CI: 1.76-4.11) in patients with stage III-N2 nonsmall cell lung cancer compared with adjuvant postoperative chemotherapy (POCT) alone. But could not improve 5-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rate (OR = 1.14, 95%CI: 0.52-2.52). The results of subgroup analysis showed that postoperative sequential chemoradiotherapy could improve the 3 and 5 years OS rate (OR = 2.06, 95%CI: 1.22-3.46; OR = 1.39, 95%CI: 1.21-1.59). Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) can improve the 3 and 5 years OS rate (OR = 1.80, 95%CI: 1.09-2.99; OR = 1.31, 95%CI: 1.04-1.66). In addition, POCRT could improve the 3-year OS rate (OR = 1.88, 95%CI: 1.21-2.92) in patients with N2 single-station lymph node metastasis compared with POCT alone. Conclusion:Compared with POCT alone, adjuvant POCRT can significantly improve the overall survival rate of patients with NSCLC after R0 resection of stage III-N2, especially in patients with N2 single-station lymph node metastasis. Accurate radiotherapy techniques such as 3DCRT or IMRT are recommended, and postoperative sequential chemoradiotherapy is the best treatment mode.