Background: A large amount of evidence suggests that proprotein convertase subtilisin/Kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors have clinical benefits in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, whether PCSK9 concentrations predict future cardiovascular (CV) events remains unclear.Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the ability of PCSK9 concentrations to predict future CV events in patients with established CVD. A comprehensive search of electronic databases was conducted in June 2021. We included relative risk (RR) estimates with 95% CI or events of interest.Results: Eleven cohort studies including 8,471 patients with CVD were enrolled. The pooled RR of CV events for the increase in the circulating baseline PCSK9 concentrations by 1 SD showed a positive association in a random-effect model (RR 1.226, 95% CI: 1.055–1.423, P = 0.008). Similarly, the risk of the total CV events increased by 52% in the patients in the highest tertile compared with those in the lowest tertile of circulating PCSK9 concentrations (RR 1.523, 95% CI: 1.098–2.112, P = 0.012). The association between PCSK9 and CV events was stronger in stable patients with CVD, patients treated with statins, and Asian patients.Conclusions: High PCSK9 concentrations are significantly related to the increased risk of future CV events. These results enrich the knowledge of PCSK9 function and suggest the further possible clinical role of PCSK9 inhibitors.
ObjectivesUsing quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), optical coherence tomography (OCT), histomorphometry, and pharmacokinetics, this study tried to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Biomagic rapamycin-eluting bioabsorbable scaffold (BVS) in non-atherosclerotic porcine coronary arteries.BackgroundBiomagic BVS is a new generation of thin-strut bioabsorbable scaffold. We conducted comparative study detailing pathological response, safety and efficacy of Biomagic BVS and the Firebird2 rapamycin-eluting cobalt-based alloy stent (DES) in a porcine coronary artery model. The animals were followed up at 14 days, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, and 60 months after stent implantation.MethodsA total of 143 devices (95 Biomagic and 48 Firebird2) were implanted in 2 or 3 main coronary arteries of 76 nonatherosclerotic swine and examined by QCA, OCT, light microscopy, and pharmacokinetics analyses at various time points.ResultsVascular responses to Biomagic and Firebird2 were largely comparable at all time points, with struts being sequestered within the neointima. The degree of inflammation of both devices was mild to moderate, although the Biomagic score was higher at 14 days to 24 months. However, there was no statistical difference between the two groups except 14 days. At each follow-up time point, the percentage of area stenosis in the Biomagic group was greater than that in the Firebird 2 group, but there was no statistical difference between the two groups at 3 and 12 months. The extent of fibrin deposition was similar between Biomagic and Firebird2, which peaked at 1 month and decreased rapidly thereafter. Pharmacokinetic study showed that coronary tissue sirolimus concentration remained above 2 ng/mg of tissue at 28 day. Histomorphometry showed expansile remodeling of Biomagic-implanted arteries starting after 12 months, and lumen area was significantly greater in Biomagic than Firebird2 at 36 and 42 months. These changes correlated with dismantling of Biomagic seen after 12 months. OCT images confirmed that degradation of Biomagic was complete by 36 months.ConclusionsBiomagic demonstrates comparable long-term safety to Firebird2 in porcine coronary arteries with mild to moderate inflammation. Although Biomagic was associated with greater percent stenosis relative to Firebird2 within 36 months, expansile remodeling was observed after 12 months in Biomagic with significantly greater lumen area at ≥36 months. Scaffold resorption is considered complete at 36 months.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.