BackgroundDiminished ovarian reserve(DOR) is associated with female infertility and poor response to ovarian stimulation. Our objective was to assess the effect of dehydroepiandrosterone(DHEA) on DOR women and to explore whether the improvement of ovarian response after DHEA supplementation was dependent on the expression levels of androgen receptor(AR).MethodsA prospective cohort study was performed in the Department of Human Reproductive Medicine, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital during August 2014 to August 2016. 103 DOR women who completed the study were divided into the DHEA group (n = 53), which received DHEA supplementation (25 mg three times a day) for 8 weeks, and the control group (n = 50), which did not receive DHEA, before the IVF cycles. Serum hormone levels(FSH, LH, E2, T, DHEAs, AMH, INHB), antral follicle count(AFC) and the expression of AR and FSH receptor(FSHR) in granulosa cells(GCs) were measured, meanwhile ovarian response parameters and IVF outcomes were compared. The GCs from another 36 DOR women were cultured with different concentrations of DHEA in vitro. Then, we compared the expression of AR and FSHR in GCs according to the different numbers of oocytes retrieved both in DHEA and control group.ResultsIn the present study, DHEA supplementation resulted in significantly higher levels of serum T(P = 0.047), DHEAs(P = 0.019) and AR mRNA expression in GCs(P = 0.049). In vitro experiment, the protein and mRNA expression of AR and FSHR in the preovulatory GCs were significantly increased in response to DHEA supplementation(P <0.05). No significant differences were found in ovarian reserve, ovarian response, or IVF outcomes between the two groups. Subgroup analyses showed the levels of AR and FSHR mRNA in GCs were significantly increased in DHEA group with ≥5 oocytes retrieved(P <0.05).ConclusionDHEA supplementation can increase the expression of AR in preovulatory GCs both in vivo and in vitro. The selective beneficial effects of DHEA supplementation on ovarian response in DOR women may depend on the increasing expression of AR and FSHR in GCs.Trial registrationThe Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-IPR-15006126). Retrospectively Registered 19 March 2015.
PurposeCandida pathogens are commonly found in women and can cause vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC), whose infection rate is further increased during pregnancy. We aimed to study the Candida prevalence and strain distribution in pregnant Chinese women with a molecular beacon assay.MethodologyFrom March 2016 to February 2017, a total of 993 pregnant women attending routine antenatal visits at the Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital were enrolled. For Candida detection and identification, a unique molecular beacon assay was presented and compared with a traditional phenotypic method. Antifungal susceptibility was tested with the following agents: 5-flucytosine, amphotericin B, fluconazole, itraconazole and voriconazole.ResultsThe prevalence of Candida was found to be 21.8 % when using the molecular method and 15.0 % when using the phenotypic method. The distribution of the Candida spp. was listed in order of decreasing prevalence: Candida albicans (79.8 %), Candida glabrata (13.5 %), Candida parapsilosis (3.7 %), Candida krusei (2.2 %) and Candida tropicalis (1.1 %). We found that 90.7 % of the Candida detection results were consistent between the molecular and the phenotypic methods. In the cases where the sequencing analyses for the Candida isolates resulted in inconsistent identification, the molecular method showed higher sensitivity than the phenotypic method (96.0 vs 64.6 %). C. albicans, C. glabrata and C. parapsilosis were essentially susceptible to all five antifungal agents tested, whereas C. tropicalis and C. krusei were susceptible to voriconazole and amphotericin B.ConclusionBy exhibiting good sensitivity and specificity, the molecular assay may offer a fast and accurate Candida screening platform for pregnant women.
Background Thromboelastography (TEG) provides global assessment of hemostatic function and has been recommended to monitor potential coagulopathies during pregnancy in which hypercoagulable state is favored. In present study, we established the reference intervals (RIs) of the TEG parameters (R, K, MA, and α‐angle) with Chinese pregnant women of third trimester. In addition, we examined the diagnostic efficacies of the TEG parameters in the patients diagnosed of gestational hypertension (GH), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), or preeclampsia (PE). Methods With specified including and excluding criteria, non‐pregnant controls, healthy pregnant women, and pregnant women with GH, GDM, or PE had their venous blood drawn at Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, followed by TEG tests performed in the clinical laboratory. Results The RIs determined with the healthy pregnant women (in third trimester) for R, K, MA, and α‐angle were 4.0‐7.7, 1.2‐3.2, 51.9‐70.1, and 41.4‐74.4, respectively. When compared with the healthy pregnancy group, the K value was significantly decreased in GH patients but increased in PE patients; MA was significantly lower in the PE group. In the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analyses, K value was able to efficiently distinguish normal pregnancy from the GH patients, with an AUC of 0.86 which is far better than those of R (AUC = 0.57) and MA (AUC = 0.56). For the PE patients, the AUC of MA (0.69) was significantly greater than that of R (0.50). Conclusions Thromboelastography may provide more accurate experimental basis for monitoring coagulation functions especially in pregnant women with complications of GH and PE.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.