To mimic multilevel nerve root compression and intervertebral foramina stenosis in human, we established a new animal model of the chronic compression of unilateral multiple lumbar DRGs (mCCD) in the rat. A higher occurrence of signs of spontaneous pain behaviors, such as wet-dog shaking and spontaneous hind paw shrinking behaviors, was firstly observed from day 1 onward. In the meantime, the unilateral mCCD rat exhibited significant bilateral hind paw mechanical and cold allodynia and hyperalgesia, as well as a thermal preference to 30°C plate between 30 and 35°C. The expression of activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3) was significantly increased in the ipsilateral and contralateral all-sized DRG neurons after the mCCD. And the expression of CGRP was significantly increased in the ipsilateral and contralateral large- and medium-sized DRG neurons. ATF3 and CGRP expressions correlated to evoked pain hypersensitivities such as mechanical and cold allodynia on postoperative day 1. The results suggested that bilateral neuropathy of primary sensory neurons might contribute to bilateral hypersensitivity in the mCCD rat.

Background Liver metastases are a major contributor to the poor immunotherapy response in colorectal cancer patients. However, the distinctions in the immune microenvironment between primary tumors and liver metastases are poorly characterized. The goal of this study was to compare the expression profile of multiple immune cells to further analyze the similarities and differences between the microenvironments of liver metastases and the primary tumor. Methods Tissues from 17 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent resection of primary and liver metastases was analyzed using multispectral immunofluorescence. The expression of multiple immune cells (CD8, Foxp3, CD68, CD163, CD20, CD11c, CD66b, CD56, PD-L1, INF-γ, Ki67 and VEGFR-2) in the tumor center (TC), tumor invasive front (< 150 µm from the tumor center, TF) and peritumoral region (≥ 150 µm from the tumor center, PT) was evaluated via comparison. The expression of CD68 and CD163 in different regions was further analyzed based on the cell colocalization method. In addition, different immune phenotypes were studied and compared according to the degree of CD8 infiltration. Results The expression trends of 12 markers in the TF and TC regions were basically the same in the primary tumor and liver metastasis lesions. However, in comparison of the TF and PT regions, the expression trends were not identical between primary and liver metastases, especially CD163, which was more highly expressed in the PT region relative to the TF region. In the contrast of different space distribution, the expression of CD163 was higher in liver metastases than in the primary foci. Further analysis of CD68 and CD163 via colocalization revealed that the distribution of macrophages in liver metastases was significantly different from that in the primary foci, with CD68−CD163+ macrophages predominating in liver metastases. In addition, among the three immunophenotypes, CD163 expression was highest in the immune rejection phenotype. Conclusions The immune cells found in the primary tumors of colorectal cancer differed from those in liver metastases in terms of their spatial distribution. More immunosuppressive cells were present in the liver metastases, with the most pronounced differential distribution found for macrophages. CD68−CD163+ macrophages may be associated with intrahepatic immunosuppression and weak immunotherapeutic effects.

Background Liver metastases are a major contributor to the poor immunotherapy response in colorectal cancer patients. However, the distinctions in the immune microenvironment between primary tumors and liver metastases are poorly characterized. The goal of this study was to compare the expression profile of multiple immune cells to further analyze the similarities and differences between the microenvironments of liver metastases and the primary tumor. Methods Tissues from 17 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent resection of primary and liver metastases was analyzed using multispectral immunofluorescence. The expression of multiple immune cells (CD8, Foxp3, CD68, CD163, CD20, CD11c, CD66b, CD56, PD-L1, INF-γ, Ki67 and VEGFR-2) in the tumor center (TC), tumor invasive front (<150 µm from the tumor center, TF) and peritumoral region (≥150 µm from the tumor center, PT) was evaluated via comparison. The expression of CD68 and CD163 in different regions was further analyzed based on the cell colocalization method. In addition, different immune phenotypes were studied and compared according to the degree of CD8 infiltration.Results The expression trends of 12 markers in the TF and TC regions were basically the same in the primary tumor and liver metastasis lesions. However, in comparison of the TF and PT regions, the expression trends were not identical between primary and liver metastases, especially CD163, which was more highly expressed in the PT region relative to the TF region. In the contrast of different space distribution, the expression of CD163 was higher in liver metastases than in the primary foci. Further analysis of CD68 and CD163 via colocalization revealed that the distribution of macrophages in liver metastases was significantly different from that in the primary foci, with CD68-CD163+ macrophages predominating in liver metastases. In addition, among the three immunophenotypes, CD163 expression was highest in the immune rejection phenotype. Conclusions The immune cells found in the primary tumors of colorectal cancer differed from those in liver metastases in terms of their spatial distribution. More immunosuppressive cells were present in the liver metastases, with the most pronounced differential distribution found for macrophages. CD68-CD163+ macrophages may be associated with intrahepatic immunosuppression and weak immunotherapeutic effects.

Purpose Colon cancer is among the most common malignant tumors with poor prognosis in the world. SPOCD1 encodes transcription factor S-II family proteins whose aberrant expression is linked to tumor progression and immune regulation. However, it remains unclear whether SPOCD1 contributes to the progression and immunoregulation of colon cancer. Therefore, we sought to explore and confirm the expression of SPOCD1 in colon cancer and its association with immune regulation in this study. Methods Based on RNA-seq data from the TCGA colon cancer project, we explored the expression of SPOCD1 and its relationship with the OS, DSS, and PFI of patients with colon cancer. Moreover, the connection between SPOCD1 and the infiltration level of immune cells, immunomodulators and chemokines and receptors in colon cancer was comprehensively investigated utilizing the TIMER, GEPIA and TISIDB databases. Finally, we confirmed the expression of SPOCD1 in colon cancer and its correlation with immune cell infiltration by immunohistochemistry and multiplex immunohistochemistry. Results We found that SPOCD1 expression was increased in colon cancer and had tremendously diagnostic and prognostic value. The area under the curve (AUC) for SPOCD1 in COAD is 0.910 (95% CI 0.875–0.946) and high expression of SPOCD1 indicates a shorter OS, DSS and PFI in patients with colon cancer. Additionally, the increased expression of SPOCD1 in colon cancer is linked to the infiltration levels of immunomodulators, chemokines and receptors, neutrophils, macrophages and cancer-associated fibroblasts. We demonstrated that the expression of SPOCD1 was elevated in colon cancer tissues and expressed in both the nucleus and cytoplasm by immunohistochemistry. Through a multiplex immunohistochemistry experiment, we further confirmed the positive correlation between SPOCD1 expression and the expression of immune markers, including CD11b, CD163 and αSMA. Conclusion Taken together, our results suggest that SPOCD1 can be utilized as a promising indicator for diagnosis and prognosis evaluation and has tremendous potential to modulate the immune microenvironment in the progression of colon cancer.