Humans detect changes in the air pressure and understand the surroundings through the auditory system. The sound humans perceive is composed of two distinct physical properties, frequency and intensity. However, our knowledge is limited how the brain perceives and combines these two properties simultaneously (i.e., intra-auditory integration), especially in relation to motor behaviors. Here, we investigated the effect of intra-auditory integration between the frequency and intensity components of auditory feedback on motor outputs in a constant finger-force production task. The hierarchical variability decomposition model previously developed was used to decompose motor performance into mathematically independent components each of which quantifies a distinct motor behavior such as consistency, repeatability, systematic error, within-trial synergy, or between-trial synergy. We hypothesized that feedback on two components of sound as a function of motor performance (frequency and intensity) would improve motor performance and multi-finger synergy compared to feedback on just one component (frequency or intensity). Subjects were instructed to match the reference force of 18 N with the sum of all finger forces (virtual finger or VF force) while listening to auditory feedback of their accuracy. Three experimental conditions were used: (i) condition F, where frequency changed; (ii) condition I, where intensity changed; (iii) condition FI, where both frequency and intensity changed. Motor performance was enhanced for the FI conditions as compared to either the F or I condition alone. The enhancement of motor performance was achieved mainly by the improved consistency and repeatability. However, the systematic error remained unchanged across conditions. Within- and between-trial synergies were also improved for the FI condition as compared to either the F or I condition alone. However, variability of individual finger forces for the FI condition was not significantly decreased as compared to I condition alone. This result indicates an improvement in motor performance is consistent with Bayesian estimation, and changes in multi-finger interaction mostly result in the enhanced motor performance. These findings provide evidence that the central nervous system can take advantage of the intra-auditory integration in a statistically optimal (Bayesian) fashion to enhance motor performance by improving multi-finger synergy.
When a person plays a musical instrument, sound is produced and the integrated frequency and intensity produced are perceived aurally. The central nervous system (CNS) receives defective afferent signals from auditory systems and delivers imperfect efferent signals to the motor system due to the noise in both systems. However, it is still little known about auditory-motor interactions for successful performance. Here, we investigated auditory-motor interactions as multi-sensory input and multi-motor output system. Subjects performed a constant force production task using four fingers in three different auditory feedback conditions, where either the frequency (F), intensity (I), or both frequency and intensity (FI) of an auditory tone changed with sum of finger forces. Four levels of uncertainty (high, moderate-high, moderate-low, and low) were conditioned by manipulating the feedback gain of the produced force. We observed performance enhancement under the FI condition compared to either F or I alone at moderate-high uncertainty. Interestingly, the performance enhancement was greater than the prediction of the Bayesian model, suggesting super-optimality. We also observed deteriorated synergistic multi-finger interactions as the level of uncertainty increased, suggesting that the CNS responded to increased uncertainty by changing control strategy of multi-finger actions.
The results suggest that RE was more effective than WE in retaining exercise participation and improving physical function in older adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2017; 17: 2311-2318.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.