Objective. To investigate the clinical efficacy of cedilanid and isosorbide dinitrate plus pericardial dissection for chronic constrictive pericarditis in the elderly. Methods. Ninety elderly patients with chronic constrictive pericarditis admitted to our hospital from March 2018 to October 2020 were recruited and assigned to receive either cedilanid and isosorbide dinitrate (control group A), pericardial dissection (control group B), or cedilanid and isosorbide dinitrate plus pericardial dissection (combination group) via random number table method, with 30 patients in each group. Outcome measures included plasma endothelin, atrial natriuretic peptide, system immune-inflammation indices, treatment effect, quality of life, mental state, and treatment satisfaction. Results. The combination group had significantly higher treatment satisfaction and treatment efficacy than control groups A and B (
P
>
0.05
). The combination group showed the lowest levels of atrial natriuretic peptide and endothelin, followed by control group A, and group B (
P
<
0.001
). The combined therapy resulted in significantly lower levels of system immunity index, lower Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD) scores, and better General Quality of Life Inventory-74 (GQOLI-74) scores than those of the control group B, followed by group A (
P
<
0.001
). Conclusion. Cedilanid and isosorbide dinitrate plus pericardial dissection for elderly patients with chronic constrictive pericarditis enhances the level of plasma endothelin, atrial natriuretic peptide, and systemic immune-inflammation indexes of patients and improves their quality of life, which shows great potential for clinical promotion.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.