The Blue Plains Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant (Washington, D.C.) uses methanol as an external carbon source in a postdenitrification process, to achieve low effluent total nitrogen concentrations. This becomes more difficult in winter, at lower mixed liquor temperatures and higher flows, as a consequence of the kinetic behavior of the methanol-utilizing heterotrophs. The paper reports on an experimental batch test study conducted on Blue Plains postdenitrification sludge to investigate (1) the maximum specific growth rate of methanol-utilizing heterotrophs (l METH ); (2) the temperature dependency of the growth rate; and (3) the efficacy of alternate substrates (ethanol, acetate, and sugar). A limited number of tests were conducted on sludge from two other treatment plants with methanol addition. Water Environ. Res., 80, 417 (2008).

Facilities across North America are designing plants to meet stringent limit of technology (LOT) treatment for nitrogen removal. In the Mid-Atlantic region of the United States, this is in response to the Chesapeake Bay Agreement, which limit effluent total nitrogen discharges from wastewater treatment plants to between 3-5 mg/L. Since denitrification is crucial for the removal of nitrogen, maximizing this process step will result in a decrease in nutrient load to the receiving waters. Of particular interest is the use of an alternate external carbon source to replace the most commonly used carbon, methanol. Three external carbon sources were evaluated in this study including: methanol, ethanol and acetate at 13 degrees C. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relative benefits and constraints for using these three carbon types. Laboratory scale Sequencing Batch Reactors (SBRs) were set up to grow and acclimate carbon free biomass to the specified substrate while in-situ Specific Denitrification Rates (SDNRs) were conducted concurrently. The results suggest that the SDNRs for acetate (31.0 + or - 4.6 mgNO(3)-N/gVSS/hr) and ethanol (29.6 + or - 5.6 mgNO(3)-N/gVSS/hr) are higher than that for methanol (10.1 + or - 2.5 mgNO(3)-N/gVSS/hr). The yield coefficients in g COD/g COD were observed to follow a similar trend with values of 0.45 + or - 0.05 for methanol, 0.53 + or - 0.06 for ethanol and 0.66 + or - 0.06 for acetate.

Facilities across North America are designing plants to meet stringent limits of technology (LOT) treatment for nitrogen removal (3-5 mg/L total effluent nitrogen). The anoxic capacity requirements for meeting LOT treatment are dependent on the growth rates of the denitrifying organisms. The Blue Plains Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant (AWTP) is one of many facilities in the Chesapeake Bay region that is evaluating its ability to meet LOT treatment capability. The plant uses methanol as an external carbon source in a post-denitrification process. The process is very sensitive to denitrification in the winter. One approach to improve anoxic capacity utilization is to use an alternative substrate for denitrification in the winter to promote the growth of organisms that denitrify at higher rates. The aim of this study was to evaluate denitrification maximum specific growth rates for three substrates, acetate, corn syrup and methanol, at two temperatures (13 degrees C and 19 degrees C). These temperatures approximately reflect the minimum monthly and average annual wastewater temperature at the Blue Plains AWTP. The results suggest that the maximum specific growth rate (mu(max)) for corn syrup (1.3 d(-1)) and acetate (1.2 d(-1)) are higher than that for methanol (0.5d(-1)) at low temperature of 13 degrees C. A similar trend was observed at 19 degrees C.

Wastewater treatment plants in the Chesapeake Bay region are becoming more interested in external carbon sources for denitrification. This is in response to the recent regulations to remediate the Chesapeake Bay, which will limit effluent total nitrogen to near 3 mg/L for plants, thus requiring near complete elimination of inorganic nitrogen species. Since sufficient internal carbon is usually not available for complete denitrification, external carbon is needed to supplement internal sources. Of particular interest is the use of an alternate external carbon source to replace the least expensive source methanol. This study focuses on three commonly available external carbon sources: methanol, ethanol and acetate. The aim of this study was to obtain the specific denitrification rate (SDNR) of the substrates under several conditions. Sequencing batch reactors (SBRs) were set up to first grow biomass to the specified substrate while in situ SDNRs were conducted concurrently. Once the biomass was grown with the corresponding substrate, a series of ex situ SDNRs were performed using various biomass/substrate combinations to evaluate response to substrate combinations at 13 degrees C. Results from this study indicate that the SDNRs for biomass grown on methanol, ethanol and acetate were 9.2 mg NO(3)-N/g VSS/hr, 30.4 mg NO(3)-N/gVSS/hr and 31.7 mg NO(3)-N/g VSS/hr, respectively, suggesting that acetate and ethanol were equally effective external carbon sources followed by much lower SDNR using methanol. Ethanol could be used with methanol biomass with similar rates as that of methanol. Additionally, methanol was rapidly acclimated to ethanol grown biomass suggesting that the two substrates could be interchanged to grow respective populations with a minimum lag period.

No abstract