Highlights
Adhesive capsulitis of hip joint is uncommon disease usually affecting young adults.
Pain relief might be associated with arthrogram study.
Hormonal changes during pregnancy might have some effect on adhesive capsulitis.
Study Design: Meta-analysis. Objective: To compare outcomes between minimally invasive scoliosis surgery (MISS) and traditional posterior instrumentation and fusion in the correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Methods: A literature search was performed using MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Google scholar and Cochrane databases, including studies reporting outcomes for both MISS and open correction of AIS. Study details, demographics, and outcomes, including curve correction, estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, postoperative pain, length of stay (LOS), and complications, were collected and analyzed. Results: A total of 4 studies met the selection criteria and were included in the analysis, totaling 107 patients (42 MIS and 65 open) with a mean age of 16 years. Overall there was no difference in curve correction between MISS (73.2%) and open (76.7%) cohorts. EBL was significantly lower in the MISS (271 ml) compared to the open (527 ml) group, but operative time was significantly longer (380 min for MISS versus 302 min for open). There were no significant differences between the approaches in pain, LOS, complications, or reoperations. Conclusion: MISS was associated with less blood loss but longer operative times compared to traditional open fusion for AIS. There was no difference in curve correction, postoperative pain, LOS, or complications/reoperations. While MISS has emerged as a feasible option for the surgical management of AIS, further research is warranted to compare these 2 approaches.
Background
The ligamentum teres has been recognized as an important stabilizer of the hip joint and can be affected by various hip pathologies. This study aims to introduce ligamentum teres edema as an MRI marker to diagnose the underlying cause of hip pathology, mainly femoral acetabular impingement (FAI) and adult developmental dysplasia of the hip (ADDH), in non-traumatic patients.
Methodology
Adult patients presenting with non-traumatic hip pain of variable duration and ligamentum teres edema on MRI between 2014 and 2020 were included. A high-resolution standard MRI hip protocol was used for all patients in this series. MRI and plain radiographs were assessed. Ligamentum teres edema, alpha angle, center edge angle of Wiberg, and retroversion were assessed.
Results
In total, 55 patients with 110 hip joints (males: 29 (52.7%), females: 26 (47.3%)) of different ethnicities were included in this study. Out of the 55 patients with ligamentum teres edema, one had only unilateral right-sided FAI, seven had only unilateral left-sided FAI, and 46 (94 hip joints) had either bilateral FAI or ADDH. Therefore, eight (14.5%) patients with unilateral FAI had the absence of the contralateral FAI or ADDH (6.5% false-positive) despite the presence of ligamentum teres edema bilaterally, and the rest of the patients with bilateral ligamentum teres edema (102 joints: 92.7% positive predictive value) had findings of either FAI or ADDH.
Conclusions
Ligamentum teres edema can be considered as an early MRI marker to diagnose the underlying pathology of symptomatic painful hip disorders, especially FAI.
Symmetrical peripheral gangrene (SPG) is a rare condition. At present, there is no clear etiology for this condition; however, it has been associated with multiple risk factors, including sepsis and coagulopathy. We present a patient who sustained a polytrauma with multiple organ injuries. During hospitalization, he developed septic and cardiogenic shock complications by disseminated intravascular coagulopathy, which led to ischemic changes in all four limbs. The patient underwent bilateral – trans-tibial and trans-radial – amputation. High level of suspicion and awareness are required to detect such a devastating condition in order to mitigate complications. We conclude that ischemic changes secondary to SPG are irreversible; subsequently, halting the disease progression is the mainstay of treatment.
Background
Combined ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures are rare and present a challenging management dilemma. This study aims to assess the outcome of concomitant fixation of the ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fracture using single versus dual surgical implants.
Methods
A single-center retrospective analysis of patients who underwent fixation of ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures was performed over a 13-year period. Different techniques were employed to fix the complex injury. Both the reduction and the union time were assessed radiographically.
Results
A total of 36 patients with ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures were retrospectively identified and included in the study. Twenty-four patients (66.6%) were managed with a single cephalomedullary nail, while the remaining cases were treated with two devices. All cases were operated on within an average of 3.7 ± 7.1 days. Eight patients (22.2%) developed postoperative complications. The average follow-up period was 7.3 ± 6.8 months. Although there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups, the femoral neck fractures showed shorter union time in patients treated with one implant compared to patients treated with two implants (3.0 ± 2.3 months vs. 4.2 ± 2.6 months). Another observation was that higher percentages of implant removal/failure and malunion/nonunion were seen in patients who had one implant compared to the two implants group (12.5% vs. 8.3%).
Conclusion
Early surgical fixation of both fractures is associated with good outcome results. No difference in outcome was observed between both groups.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.