No abstract

In neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), proliferation markers, especially Ki-67, have become increasingly important. This study was designed to examine the reproducibility of Ki-67 for use in the current classification of NETs. A retrospectively assembled integrated database with prospectively collected data of patients undergoing multidisciplinary management for NETs from 2000 to 2009 was analyzed. Original pathology was reviewed to reassess Ki-67 values. Ki-67 was then categorized to grades G1 (≤2 %), G2 (3-20 %), or G3 (>20 %) according to the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) guidelines and the 2010 World Health Organization (WHO) classification. Original Ki-67 values were compared to reviewed values. All statistical analyses were carried out using SAS 9.1.3. A total of 184 patients were included of which 48 % were male. The most common primary NET site was the small bowel, in 27 %. On pathology review, there was 94 % agreement for G1, with 4 % of cases upgraded at review to G2 and 2 % of cases upgraded to G3. For G2, there was 94 % agreement, with 6 % of cases downgraded to G1 and 0 % upgraded. For G3, there was 90 % agreement, with 10 % of cases downgraded to G2 and none to G1 (kappa = 0.89). Ki-67 is a proliferative marker for NETs that is highly reproducible when used to grade tumors according to ENETS and WHO categories. The high inter-institutional reliability in the determination of tumor grade as assessed by Ki-67 makes it a reliable tool in the assessment of patients with NETs.

BackgroundGiven the variation in human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine coverage across Canada, and debate regarding delivery of HPV vaccines in Catholic schools, we studied online comments on Canadian news websites to understand public perceptions of HPV and HPV vaccine.MethodsWe searched English- and French-language Canadian news websites for 2012 articles that contained the terms “HPV” or “human papillomavirus.” Articles about HPV vaccinations that contained at least one comment were included. Two researchers independently coded comments, analyzing them for emerging themes.ResultsWe identified 3073 comments from 1198 individuals in response to 71 news articles; 630 (52.6%) individuals expressed positive sentiments about HPV vaccination (2.5 comments/individual), 404 (33.7%) were negative (3.0 comments/individual), 34 (2.8%) were mixed (1.5 comments/individual) and 130 (10.8%) were neutral (1.6 comments/individual). Vaccine-supportive commenters believed the vaccine is safe and effective. Common themes in negative comments included concerns regarding HPV vaccine safety and efficacy, distrust of pharmaceutical companies and government, and belief that school-age children are too young for HPV vaccine. Many comments focused on whether the Catholic Church has the right to inform health policy for students, and discussion often evolved into debates regarding HPV and sexual behaviour. We noted that many individuals doubted the credibility of vaccine safety information.ConclusionThe majority of commenters do not appear to be against HPV vaccination, but public health messaging that focuses on both the vaccine’s safety profile, and its use as a means to prevent cancer rather than sexually transmitted HPV infection may facilitate its acceptance.

Public Health Agency of Canada/Canadian Institutes of Health Research Influenza Research Network.