Objectives: To investigate the role of inflammation-related factors, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) alone and combined detection with cancer antigen 125 (CA125), in the prognostic assessment of ovarian cancer (OC). Methods: A retrospective clinicopathologic review was performed. The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves of LMR, CA125, and COLC predicting mortality in OC patients were constructed. Besides, Kaplan−Meier and Cox logistic regression models were used to plot the survival curves and determine the independent prognostic factors. Results: A total of 214 OC patients were identified in this cohort. The mean duration of follow-up was 64 months (minimum 8 months, maximum 116 months). In this cohort, 135 cases died (63.1%), and the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 20 and 39.5 months, respectively. Results of the multivariate Cox regression model showed that LMR≤3.8 (HR = 0.494, 95% CI: 0.
Objectives: This study was to analyze the relationships between lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) alone or combined with serum CA125 (COLC) and advanced stage of ovarian cancer (OC). Methods: The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves of LMR, CA125, and COLC staging OC were constructed by a retrospective study. Furthermore, a binary logistic regression model was used to assay the independent risk factors for OC staging. Results: Two hundred and twenty-five patients with OC were identified in this cohort. Eighty-five OC patients were diagnosed at an early stage, and 140 OC patients were diagnosed at an advanced stage. The median of LMR in the early stage was higher than that in advanced stage (4.4 vs. 2.8), and the median of serum CA125 was lower than that in advanced stage (80 U/mL vs. 251.3 U/mL). Multivariate logistic regression LMR≤3.7 (OR=0.299, 95% CI: 0.093-0.962, P=0.043) and CA125>95.7 U/mL (OR=4.317, 95% CI: 1.436-12.977, P=0.009) were risk factors for stage of advanced OC whether presence or absence of malignant ascites. Furthermore, the area under the curve of COLC was higher than that of LMR (0.782 vs. 0.732) or serum CA125 (0.782 vs. 0.708) in staging OC. The specificity of COLC was higher than that of LMR (87.1% vs. 70.6%) or serum CA125 (87.1% vs. 61.2%) in staging OC. Conclusion: LMR alone or in combination with serum CA125 might be associated with OC staging. Besides, as a predictive factor, COLC may have a high specificity in staging OC.
Background: Detailed descriptions of the relationship between lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio alone and combined with CA125 (COLC) and advanced stage of ovarian cancer (OC) have been lacking to date. This study is to analyze the relationship between LMR, CA125 and COLC and advanced stage of OC.Methods: A retrospective clinicopathologic review was performed. The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves of LMR, CA125, and COLC staging OC were constructed. Furthermore, a binary logistic regression model was used to assay the independent risk factors.Results: A total of 225 patients with OC were identified in this cohort. Eighty-five patients with OC were diagnosed at an early stage, and 140 OC patients were diagnosed at an advanced stage. The median of LMR at the early stage was higher than the advanced stage (4.39 vs. 2.78), and the median of CA125 was lower than the advanced stage (80 U/mL vs. 251.25 U/mL). Multivariate logistic regression indicated that LMR (OR=0.314, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.143–0.687, P=0.004) and CA125 (OR=4.045, 95%CI: 1.883–8.692, P<0.001) were associated with OC staging. Furthermore, the area under the curve of COLC was higher than that of LMR (0.779 vs. 0.732) or CA125 (0.779 vs. 0.708) in staging OC. The specificity of COLC was higher than that of LMR (87.11% vs. 70.61%) or CA125 (87.11% vs. 61.21%) in staging OC.Conclusions: LMR alone or in combination with CA125 might be associated with OC staging. Besides, as a predictive factor, COLC may have high specificity in staging OC.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.