<p><strong>Abstract.</strong> This study investigates the effects of model resolution and microphysics parameterizations on the uncertainties or errors in the simulations of clouds, precipitation, and their interactions with aerosols using the Global Forecast System (GFS) model as one of the representative numerical weather prediction (NWP) models. For this investigation, we used the GFS model results and compare them with those from the cloud-system resolving model (CSRM) simulations as benchmark simulations that adopt high resolutions and full-fledged microphysical processes. These simulations were evaluated against observations and this evaluation demonstrated that the CSRM simulations can function as benchmark simulations. Substantially lower updrafts and associated cloud variables (e.g., cloud mass and condensation) were simulated by the GFS model compared to those simulated by the CSRM. This is mainly due to the coarse resolutions in the GFS model. This indicates that the parameterizations that represent sub-grid processes in the GFS model do not work well and thus need to be improved. Results here also indicate that the use of the coarse resolution in the GFS model lowers the sensitivity of updrafts and cloud variables to increasing aerosol concentrations compared to the CSRM simulations. The parameterization of the saturation process plays an important role in the sensitivity of cloud variables to aerosol concentrations while the parameterization of the sedimentation process has a substantial impact on how cloud variables are distributed vertically. The variation in cloud variables with resolution is much greater and contributes to the discrepancy between the GFS and CSRM simulations to a much greater degree than what happens with varying microphysics parameterizations.</p>
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.