Highly reflective mulches significantly increased total concentrations of ellagic acid and ascorbic acid relative to control in fruit of different cultivars. The potential of agronomic practices to enhance the concentration and amounts of these important dietary bioactive compounds is discussed.

The aim of this review is to present an outline of the physiological perspectives of beneficial antioxidant production in fruit. The drive to enhance the consumption of fruit and vegetables in the human diet is linked with positive effects of beneficial antioxidants impacting on health promotion. We briefly outline our physiological understanding of environmental processes which induce the production of reactive oxygen species and how antioxidants prevent plant cellular damage. More specifically, we describe the impact that environmental stresses, such as drought and radiation, have on the production of endogenous antioxidants and how these stresses can be incorporated into novel experimental crop growing systems to achieve high antioxidant concentrations in fruits. This includes in particular the use of irrigation application techniques and enhanced light reflectance to increase the concentrations of bioactive compounds such as ellagic acid and ascorbic acid.

No abstract

No abstract

The relationship between shoot growth and rooting was examined in two, 'difficult-to root' amenity trees, Syringa vulgaris L. cv. Charles Joly and Corylus avellana L. cv. Aurea. A range of treatments reflecting severity of pruning was imposed on field-grown stock prior to bud break. To minimise variation due to the numbers of buds that developed under different treatments, bud number was restricted to 30 per plant. Leafy cuttings were harvested at different stages of the active growth phase of each species. With Syringa, rooting decreased with later harvests, but loss of rooting potential was delayed in cuttings collected from the most severe pruning treatment. Rooting potential was associated with the extent of post-excision shoot growth on the cutting but regression analyses indicated that this relationship could not entirely explain the loss of rooting with time, nor the effects due to pruning. Similarly, in Corylus rooting was promoted by severe pruning, but the relationship between apical growth on the cutting and rooting was weaker than in Syringa, and only at the last harvest did growth play a critical role in determining rooting. Another unusual factor of the last harvest of Corylus was a bimodal distribution of roots per cutting, with very few rooted cuttings having less than five roots. This implies that, for this harvest at least, the potential of an individual cutting to root is probably not limited by the number of potential rooting sites.

J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 72(1): [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] 2014 Gushing is the vigorous overfoaming of carbonated beverages when the bottle is opened. Primary gushing in beer is mostly caused by a group of proteins called hydrophobins secreted by filamentous fungi, which contaminate CO 2 gaseous molecules during carbonation and form nanobubbles. The influence of hop oil antifoam on primary gushing showed a complete suppressing effect in sparkling water, a decreasing effect in wort, and no influence on gushing-positive beers. This shows the importance of the critical point of addition of this product in the brewing process. GC and GC-MS analysis show that commercial available lipophilic hop extract comprises fatty acids, either saturated fatty acids (SFA) or unsaturated fatty acids (UFA) (both free and incorporated in mono-, di-, and triglycerides), waxes (long-chain alkanes), and steroid compounds. Gushing analysis of each compound showed that SFA and UFA behave in a different manner regarding gushing. In contrast to SFA and trans-form UFA, cis-form UFAs do not induce gushing. Long-chain alkanes provide sufficient hydrophobic structures to interact with gaseous CO 2 molecules and induce gushing. Because hop antifoam molecules are hydrophobic, they interact with hydrophobins and prevent interaction with CO 2 and, consequently, inhibit the possibilities of development of the explosive nanobubble structure.

No abstract

No abstract