Background
Despite substantial improvements in short-term kidney allograft survival, median long-term survival remains at a standstill. It is unclear whether and to what extent a transplant-center's post-transplant care influences long-term outcomes.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed 501 single kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) who underwent transplantation between 2 009 and 2 018 and did not develop rejection or dnDSA within the first post-transplant year. After that, KTRs were either followed exclusively three-monthly by the transplant-center(n = 197) or three-monthly by local nephrologists (n = 304) with only yearly follow-up by the transplant-center. We analyzed kidney allograft outcomes regarding eGFR decline, proteinuria, development of dnDSA, and rejection.
Results
No differences between the two groups were observed in the baseline characteristics and the characteristics at the end of the first post-transplant (p > 0.05). KTRs followed by local nephrologists were comparable to KTRs followed by the transplant-center concerning patient survival (p = 0.541), kidney allograft survival (p = 0.385), eGFR decline (p = 0.488), progression of proteinuria (p > 0.05), the development of dnDSA (p = 0.335), and TCMR (p = 0.480). KTRs followed by the transplant-center were more likely to undergo indication biopsies in case of allograft dysfunction and dnDSA (p < 0.001). ABMR was diagnosed earlier and more frequently (p = 0.059), recurrent glomerulonephritis was diagnosed earlier and more frequently (p = 0.026), and immunosuppression was modified earlier and more frequently in response to histological findings (p = 0.038).
Conclusions
Our findings suggest that close collaboration between local nephrologists and the transplant-center ensures good allograft outcomes independent of the caregiver. Higher biopsy activity in the transplant-center allows for earlier diagnosis of allograft dysfunction as the basis for novel treatment options.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.